Monday, February 25, 2019

Thoughts For The Week By Ron Owen of Owen Guns.

Australia Last Chance before Plunging into the Catastrophic Abyss.
We are at a cliff edge. As in last months Edition 152 I listed the treasons that have been committed by our major parties which have ravaged Australia since the Traitors committed Australia to the Lima Agreement 1974, the UN Treaty on Civilian Disarmament, and the Paris Climate Accord. In the 1960s we were a free country that had the most potential to distribute its wealth to the people who had worked to build it. Australia manufactured first class aircraft Mirage and Canberra Bombers, ships, naval vessels, refrigerators, televisions, Jindevek Missiles, motor cars, machine tools, tractors, washing machines, we had an agricultural industry that could feed the world. We had first class electrical generation, we had our own oil production, and large refineries in every major city, we had a steel industry and we owned our own mining industry.
Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. H.L. Mencken
The Betrayal
Since our bought and paid for ‘treacherous’ politicians sold us out, we don’t even produce a can opener, our steel industry is on the point of closure, our agricultural industry is in ruins and our State governments cannot even keep the electric lights on. The Federal government now says it wants to build a Defence Industry, but with forethought and planning, those same political parties have engineered the death of our manufacturing industry. The infrastructure and skills we need are now sitting in factories in China and Indonesia. Worse, we have lost the Freedom of Speech, thought and the rights to own property and the right to defend our homes and families. Even worse, they are importing a parasitical class of people that eventually intend to dominate us and kill us if we do not convert to Islam.
The Crisis Election.
As soon as the NSW elections are over the Federal Election campaigns will come into the fore. Please do not reward any of the major parties with your vote, if you make that mistake you will condemn Australia to the Abyss, a bottomless pit of despair with never a chance to crawl out. Australia will be up for grabs, a mine for China and a mosque on every corner. We are debt slaves at present to the major banks, but your vote for a major party will sentence our children and their children at best, into lives of slavery, for Islam, or China, or both.
Our only hope is to elect good independents, or the minor parties, and by that I do not mean the Clive Palmer or Derryn Hinch, or Kerryn Phelps, they are worse than the Greens. We have to elect good people to the cross benches. If either main party has the majority in the Senate, Australia is lost.

Just the Worst part of the Rogues Gallery. Traitors.
From the point of view of the 10,000 firearm owners that receive this email the best way to approach, and we all should question every candidate by email, phone or letter or personal enquiry, in these words, or use your own words, ask them if they believe that, under the Commonwealth Constitution Part V. – Powers Of The Parliament.
“51. The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have powers to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth,”
‘That a Good Government has a sacred duty to protect its citizens, when they fail to do this, the duty, not just the right, devolves to the Citizen themselves’ and ask would they vote for a private members bill to establish that duty as an interpretive schedule to the Commonwealth Constitution.
The Primary Reason Mankind lives in a Community is for internal and external Defence.
If they chose to disagree with that principle you might remind them that ‘Good Government’ is at the Consent of the Governed, the people. Individuals, instigated and formed governments primally for Defence. The sole reason for governments to exist is for the external and internal defence of the people who give their consent and live within its protection. Without that there is no role for government, as if the people are left defenceless they will either move or fall prey to home or country invaders, without a population Government has no reason to exist. Defence means being secure within their homes from danger within and without the realm and on both of those counts, our government have left us defenceless. Frédéric Bastiat wrote in his book “The Law“, That everyone has a right to protect “his person, his liberty, and his property. The state should be only a “substitution of a common force for individual forces” to defend this right.
Political Allegiance To the United Nations is Treason.
Some readers might like to also ask if the candidate would support the return to the original Schedule of the Oath and Affirmation prior to illegal alterations that have taken place, without any consultation or referenda under section 128 of the Commonwealth Constitution.
“I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her heirs and successors according to law. SO HELP ME GOD!”
Of course, I personally would follow that up with that they take the Oath on the Holy Bible and swallow a bacon sandwich, but not all of us are so forthright.
As there is overpowering evidence to the fact that Australian Senators and Members of Parliament have given allegiance and adherence to other nations, and the United Nations and other political ideology’s that are contrary to our Commonwealth Constitution and have with forethought and planing made decisions that have assisted other nations at the detriment of Australia. They should share the same fate as Vidkun Quisling, (Norway) and Pierre Laval (France) who were political leaders executed after the WW2 for collaborating with Nazi Germany.

Good Government, is Small Government.
Wilhelm von Humboldt said in 1792?...a state seeking to provide for more than the physical safety of the citizens will inevitably destroy the freedom and the creativity of the individuals.”
Our 21st Century governments have turned from being servants to master, it has turned political leaders into demi gods and citizens into debt slaves.
Is Law for the Government, or Law for the People?

Venezuela went Socialist, then banned firearm ownership, Slavery soon followed.
Freedom, personality, liberty, and property existed eons before mankind voluntarily banded together to make Laws with which he sort to protect life, family, liberty, and property. What, then, is law? The only reason for law is for the collective organization of the individual right to a lawful defence.
The primary reason that men and women chose to live in a community was for the defence of his life and family, his liberty, and his property. The secondary reason was to be able to seek Justice for a civil wrong.
Depending on your belief God, or Nature, has imparted upon every one of us the right to defend his life, family, property and his liberty, since these are the elements of preserving the component of life, each factor is rendered complete by the others, and none of them can be preserved without all of those rights. For what are our faculties, but the extension of our personality and what is property, but an extension of our faculties?

If a number of men have the right to combine together to extend, to organize a common force whose intention is to provide regularly for community defence, every other individual man has the right of defending, even by force, his personal life and family, his liberty, and his property. Logically, there is no difference the government derives its Rights from those who agree to be governed, if the people do not have that Right nor does the government. Yet, politicians, and police are protected and can have firearms and guards to protect themselves while the people are left defenceless.
Collective rights, only gain their principles, their reason for existing, their lawfulness, from the individual rights; and the common force cannot rationally have any other end, or any additional power. No more power than that of the isolated force of the individual as the governments, (Police, Army) are only a community group borrowing those same powers from the individuals and applying it for a community purpose.
Therefore, as the power within an individual cannot lawfully harm another person, the liberty, or the property of another individual for the same logical reason, the common force cannot lawfully be used to destroy the individual person, the liberty, or the property of individuals, or groups of individuals.
This corruption of force would be, in one case, as in any other, a contradiction to the whole proposition of what law is all about. Would a brave modern day politician dare to state that force has been given to government, not to defend the rights & property of the citizens, but to take their property, crush their freedoms and suppress their trade with one another? Unlikely, yet, that is the truth of what has been occurring regularly in nearly all countries of the western world. The helpless are in many stages of revolt, but mostly, by election they remove one party of robbers and elect another party to continue with the theft. We have to watch individual peoples You Tubes to see what is occurring in France and Britain on a weekly basis, as the mainstream media will spin their massive protests into ‘naughty people causing trouble again.

Every weekend in France. Seems this was how it was a 100 years ago.
Law and Security, Can we Have One without the Other?
Governments should be the organization that preserves the natural rights of good people, the defender of freedom as it is only the substitution of the collective drawn from the powers that naturally accrue from the individual. Government should support the individuals right to act in all functions, and enjoy all spheres in which their actions do not impact on the lives and property of their neighbours. If this is not true, and the power of defence is not drawn from the individual, where and how can the collective government force draw its power from? God, or the Devil or Microsoft? The collective force, police or army has its powers and the reason for its existence is to defend the individual citizens and the collective government force cannot lawfully claim more power than that is natural to the individual. They cannot rely on the maxim “Might is Right” surely Good Government means, “Right is Might”. Surely, nothing, can be more plainer than the evidence of the above. So again remember,”That a Good Government has a sacred duty to protect its citizens, when they fail to do this, the duty, not just the right, devolves to the Citizen themselves'”

What has gone wrong with Law and the Concept of Justice?
The Primary reason why mankind formed communities/governments and agreed to abide by the Rule of Law was for Defence and the Secondary reason was to appoint a government in which they could apply for Justice. However, the law has been perverted! The courts of parliament, the law courts, the police, and all the collective forces of the our nation have been gradually corrupted, not only diverted from their proper function, but have made the law pursue a function completely contrary to the good reasons that our forefathers, who banded together to initially form the government. Those brave individuals who formed governments to establish Law and Justice for the protection of the individuals and their families would be horrified to find that the Law has become the tool of every kind of rapacity, instead of the law controlling evil. The law is now guilty of every iniquity which in its inception it was commissioned to punish.

Taxation, or is it Really Government Plunder?
In its correct sense it is when a portion of wealth passes out of the hands of those who have acquired it, without their consent, and without compensation, and given to those who have not created it, whether by force or by ruse. Whenever a persons property is violated, plunder is perpetrated. Government theft, is still theft, collective theft is just as wrong, just as iniquitous as individual theft. It is absolutely essential that we all understand how wrong this extortion of taxation, (legalised plunder) is, as it is re-distributed to buy votes with welfare, and paying interest to the major Banks. The taxation/plunder by government breaks any faith in the ethical use of the Rule of Law, when the law legalises theft, how can there be any Justice. Which of these three principles should we live by?
1. When the few plunder the many?
2. When everybody plunders everybody else?
3. When nobody plunders anybody?
Partial plunder, universal plunder, absence of plunder, our choice has to be Justice for all and no plunder, that is the reason we banded together to form a government. The absence of plunder is the only principle of justice, peace, order, stability, conciliation, and of good sense that it is possible to support.
Can a citizen of Australia be Free or are we Slaves?
If for instance an individual man worked hard and prospered he most likely would appreciate the safety and security supplied by the community force and like tithings at church he most likely be willing to donate to its existence. Yet, if he suffered a great disadvantage, from a flood or a fire he would not consider taxing his local community and extorting the money from them on the threat that if they do not pay him he will destroy them and take everything they own. He would be considered a tyrant.
In comparison, the Modern State takes its own part in legalised theft, plunder or tax, and makes Laws to enforce the theft. Whenever the Modern Government suffer’s a disadvantage such as to pay its ever increasing politicians or staff, it has no scruples in demanding more wealth from the individuals and it uses its collective force to extort individuals into homeless destitution if they are unable to pay.
“They plunder, they slaughter, and they steal: this they falsely name Empire, and where they make a wasteland, they call it peace.”  Tacitus

The Object of Government has been Destroyed by its own Greed.
Modern government has acted in direct opposition to its proper goal, it has destroyed its own reason for its existence. Government theft, or extortion is just as unlawful as that committed by an individual, or a tyrant. Government has been employed in annihilating the Law which it was the reason it was established. It has removed the citizens Rights to own property, and the Right to defend that property against all comers. The Rule of Law which was governments true delegation to respect, has been replaced by politicians using the collective force of the State to plunder the wealth of the people and redistribute that wealth to the service of those who wish to benefit, without working for it and as its government theft, the people who have benefited most have not had to risk the lawful consequences such as their loss of liberty. Governments do not have absolute power, they have no power source that allows them to regulate our consciences, our ideas, our will, our education, our water our sentiments, our works, our trade, our gifts, our inheritance, our speech, our safety and our enjoyments.

Our governments have withdrawn Defence and Justice from the grasp of ordinary people, not just with their reversal of ‘law’ defending the criminal home invaders against the home defender, or the crazed mugger against the honest pedestrian with free legal aid and police that won’t prosecute as they do not want to appear ‘Racist’ or ‘Islamaphobic’. Governments, manufacture so many millions of pages of control legislation, using it as steel chains to enslave us all. Further to this, is that no longer can an individual either defend himself, or take a complaint to stand up for his Rights and Freedoms as the courts are a tight knit club that favours their own species. ‘Do It Yourself’ justice is not just discouraged but often the judges and courts are blatantly antagonistic to the citizen who cannot afford $500,000. to even begin to take on the government, or huge companies like banks or insurance companies. Again the law is used to overthrow Justice, leaving the individual defenceless.
Ignorance of Government Breeds Apathy and Allows the Government to Plunder.
Aldous Huxley, in his book, Brave New World, wrote of a citizenry of slaves who would love their enslavement. Huxley writes, “A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.” This is precisely what our federal government has been trying to do to the Australian citizenry for decades now.
The recent Royal Commission into Banking is an insult to the use of the word Royal. It never exposed the major clearing house banks creation of debt, not just the individual’s debt that they manufacture to suit any loan that they need, but the government debt. Prior to 1921 the old Commonwealth Bank, set up by Prime Minister Andrew Fisher and MP King O Mally created the finance needed to build railroads to Western Australia and Northern Terroritry, they found the money to fight World War One without borrowing from the Major banks. That old system used the powers from the Commonwealth Constitution for the government to create credit on behalf of the individuals. After 1921 politicians, Traitors, sold that huge benefit to the major banks. Now when the government needs money to build a school it borrows it from one of the four major clearing house banks and uses a Treasury note to mortgage their ability to plunder the individuals wealth. They call this theft taxation and with this they pay the banks annual interest bill and borrow again for all their expenses. The Banks produce the government debt at no cost, but you and I, have to provide real wealth, wealth that we have worked for, to pay the government extortionists. The Banks in turn pay huge amounts into the Major parties election funds which again cost them nothing. For a 100 years Politicians, Traitors and Bankers have enslaved us all in chains of debt and taxes. That fraudulent use of the public credit decreases our meagre savings and builds a mountian of debt that our grandchildren will be paying for. They hold out carrots of welfare and import more slaves, who will vote for welfare. If the major plundering parties succeed in gaining a majority in both houses it won’t be a case of asking the last one to leave Australia to turn the lights off, as we won’t be able to afford to turn them on, nor will we be able to afford to leave, we will be minority in our own country bled white, left waiting for the tiny thread holding Damocles sword to break.
There is no Spring without Winter, without Mistakes there is no Learning. There is no Life without Death, without Doubts there is no Faith. There is no Peace without War, without Fear there is no Courage. For without Mistakes, Doubts and Fears there are no pathways to Wisdom.
Ron Owen.
Any Inquiries on any products phone 07 54824099 or 07 54825070 or email

Wednesday, February 6, 2019

"The Gun Is Civilization" By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret)

Possessing any object specifically for the purpose of self-defence, lethal or non-lethal, is a criminal offence in Australia!!! There are many women, raped and/or murdered, who would have been liable to prosecution had they been carrying anything that might have saved them.

"The Gun Is Civilization"
By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret) 
Human beings only have two ways to deal with one another: reason and force. If you want me to do something for you, you have a choice of either convincing me via argument, or force me to do your bidding under threat of force. Every human interaction falls into one of those two categories, without exception. Reason or force, that’s it.
In a truly moral and civilized society, people exclusively interact through persuasion. Force has no place as a valid method of social interaction, and the only thing that removes force from the menu is the personal firearm, as paradoxical as it may sound to some.
When I carry a gun, you cannot deal with me by force. You have to use reason and try to persuade me, because I have a way to negate your threat or employment of force. The gun is the only personal weapon that puts a 100-pound woman on equal footing with a 220-pound mugger, a 75-year old retiree on equal footing with a 19-year old gangbanger, and a single gay guy on equal footing with a carload of drunk guys with baseball bats. The gun removes the disparity in physical strength, size, or numbers between a potential attacker and a defender.
There are plenty of people who consider the gun as the source of bad force equations. These are the people who think that we’d be more civilized if all guns were removed from society, because a firearm makes it easier for a mugger to do his job. That, of course, is only true if the mugger’s potential victims are mostly disarmed either by choice or by legislative fiat–it has no validity when most of a mugger’s potential marks are armed. People who argue for the banning of arms ask for automatic rule by the young, the strong, and the many, and that’s the exact opposite of a civilized society. A mugger, even an armed one, can only make a successful living in a society where the state has granted him a force monopoly.
Then there’s the argument that the gun makes confrontations lethal that otherwise would only result in injury. This argument is fallacious in several ways. Without guns involved, confrontations are won by the physically superior party inflicting overwhelming injury on the loser. People who think that fists, bats, sticks, or stones don’t constitute lethal force watch too much TV, where people take beatings and come out of it with a bloody lip at worst. The fact that the gun makes lethal force easier works solely in favor of the weaker defender, not the stronger attacker. If both are armed, the field is level. The gun is the only weapon that’s as lethal in the hands of an octogenarian as it is in the hands of a weightlifter. It simply wouldn’t work as well as a force equalizer if it wasn’t both lethal and easily employable.
When I carry a gun, I don’t do so because I am looking for a fight, but because I’m looking to be left alone. The gun at my side means that I cannot be forced, only persuaded. I don’t carry it because I’m afraid, but because it enables me to be unafraid. It doesn’t limit the actions of those who would interact with me through reason, only the actions of those who would do so by force. It removes force from the equation…and that’s why carrying a gun is a civilized act.
By Maj. L. Caudill USMC (Ret.)