Showing posts with label Treason. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Treason. Show all posts

Monday, January 13, 2020

Australian government Corruption. Big Coal's network of influence over the coalition government


The coal industry has infiltrated Australia's federal government through a secretive network of ties, working to influence Australia’s political decisions at the highest level: right up to the office of the Prime Minister, Scott Morrison
Big Coal's network of influence over the coalition government
Why is this so horrifying?
Coal is the number one cause of climate damage. It causes more frequent and intense natural disasters like bushfires while also polluting our water and air. By pandering to the interests of the coal industry, the Coalition Government is putting dirty profits ahead of the health and wellbeing of Australians who want our nation to run on clean energy.
From furthering the fossil-fuelled agenda of current Prime Minister Scott Morrison, to helping to bring about the swift downfall of former Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull: the coal industry has infiltrated the Australian Government at the highest level.
WE’VE UNCOVERED THE WEB OF CONNECTIONS BETWEEN THE WORLD’S BIGGEST COAL GIANTS, INDUSTRY GROUPS, LOBBYISTS AND POWERFUL MEDIA ORGANISATIONS THAT SERVES TO HALT ACTION ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND STALL THE TRANSITION TO CLEAN ENERGY. 


Wednesday, October 16, 2019

Environment department illegally withholds thousands of FOI pages More than 10,000 pages of documents have not been made public, including records on Adani and the Angus Taylor grasslands saga



Freedom of information documents withheld by the environment department include pages on Angus Taylor’s interactions with an investigation into land-clearing by a company he and his family part-owned. Photograph: Mike Bowers/The Guardian.
More Australian government corruption. Environment department illegally withholds thousands of FOI pages More than 10,000 pages of documents have not been made public, including records on Adani and the Angus Taylor grasslands saga.

Monday, February 25, 2019

Thoughts For The Week By Ron Owen of Owen Guns.


Australia Last Chance before Plunging into the Catastrophic Abyss.
We are at a cliff edge. As in last months Edition 152 I listed the treasons that have been committed by our major parties which have ravaged Australia since the Traitors committed Australia to the Lima Agreement 1974, the UN Treaty on Civilian Disarmament, and the Paris Climate Accord. In the 1960s we were a free country that had the most potential to distribute its wealth to the people who had worked to build it. Australia manufactured first class aircraft Mirage and Canberra Bombers, ships, naval vessels, refrigerators, televisions, Jindevek Missiles, motor cars, machine tools, tractors, washing machines, we had an agricultural industry that could feed the world. We had first class electrical generation, we had our own oil production, and large refineries in every major city, we had a steel industry and we owned our own mining industry.
Every election is a sort of advance auction sale of stolen goods. H.L. Mencken
The Betrayal
Since our bought and paid for ‘treacherous’ politicians sold us out, we don’t even produce a can opener, our steel industry is on the point of closure, our agricultural industry is in ruins and our State governments cannot even keep the electric lights on. The Federal government now says it wants to build a Defence Industry, but with forethought and planning, those same political parties have engineered the death of our manufacturing industry. The infrastructure and skills we need are now sitting in factories in China and Indonesia. Worse, we have lost the Freedom of Speech, thought and the rights to own property and the right to defend our homes and families. Even worse, they are importing a parasitical class of people that eventually intend to dominate us and kill us if we do not convert to Islam.
The Crisis Election.
As soon as the NSW elections are over the Federal Election campaigns will come into the fore. Please do not reward any of the major parties with your vote, if you make that mistake you will condemn Australia to the Abyss, a bottomless pit of despair with never a chance to crawl out. Australia will be up for grabs, a mine for China and a mosque on every corner. We are debt slaves at present to the major banks, but your vote for a major party will sentence our children and their children at best, into lives of slavery, for Islam, or China, or both.
Hope.
Our only hope is to elect good independents, or the minor parties, and by that I do not mean the Clive Palmer or Derryn Hinch, or Kerryn Phelps, they are worse than the Greens. We have to elect good people to the cross benches. If either main party has the majority in the Senate, Australia is lost.

Just the Worst part of the Rogues Gallery. Traitors.
From the point of view of the 10,000 firearm owners that receive this email the best way to approach, and we all should question every candidate by email, phone or letter or personal enquiry, in these words, or use your own words, ask them if they believe that, under the Commonwealth Constitution Part V. – Powers Of The Parliament.
“51. The Parliament shall, subject to this Constitution, have powers to make laws for the peace, order, and good government of the Commonwealth,”
‘That a Good Government has a sacred duty to protect its citizens, when they fail to do this, the duty, not just the right, devolves to the Citizen themselves’ and ask would they vote for a private members bill to establish that duty as an interpretive schedule to the Commonwealth Constitution.
The Primary Reason Mankind lives in a Community is for internal and external Defence.
If they chose to disagree with that principle you might remind them that ‘Good Government’ is at the Consent of the Governed, the people. Individuals, instigated and formed governments primally for Defence. The sole reason for governments to exist is for the external and internal defence of the people who give their consent and live within its protection. Without that there is no role for government, as if the people are left defenceless they will either move or fall prey to home or country invaders, without a population Government has no reason to exist. Defence means being secure within their homes from danger within and without the realm and on both of those counts, our government have left us defenceless. Frédéric Bastiat wrote in his book “The Law“, That everyone has a right to protect “his person, his liberty, and his property. The state should be only a “substitution of a common force for individual forces” to defend this right.
Political Allegiance To the United Nations is Treason.
Some readers might like to also ask if the candidate would support the return to the original Schedule of the Oath and Affirmation prior to illegal alterations that have taken place, without any consultation or referenda under section 128 of the Commonwealth Constitution.
“I, A.B., do swear that I will be faithful and bear true allegiance to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Her heirs and successors according to law. SO HELP ME GOD!”
Of course, I personally would follow that up with that they take the Oath on the Holy Bible and swallow a bacon sandwich, but not all of us are so forthright.
As there is overpowering evidence to the fact that Australian Senators and Members of Parliament have given allegiance and adherence to other nations, and the United Nations and other political ideology’s that are contrary to our Commonwealth Constitution and have with forethought and planing made decisions that have assisted other nations at the detriment of Australia. They should share the same fate as Vidkun Quisling, (Norway) and Pierre Laval (France) who were political leaders executed after the WW2 for collaborating with Nazi Germany.

Good Government, is Small Government.
Wilhelm von Humboldt said in 1792?...a state seeking to provide for more than the physical safety of the citizens will inevitably destroy the freedom and the creativity of the individuals.”
Our 21st Century governments have turned from being servants to master, it has turned political leaders into demi gods and citizens into debt slaves.
Is Law for the Government, or Law for the People?

Venezuela went Socialist, then banned firearm ownership, Slavery soon followed.
Freedom, personality, liberty, and property existed eons before mankind voluntarily banded together to make Laws with which he sort to protect life, family, liberty, and property. What, then, is law? The only reason for law is for the collective organization of the individual right to a lawful defence.
The primary reason that men and women chose to live in a community was for the defence of his life and family, his liberty, and his property. The secondary reason was to be able to seek Justice for a civil wrong.
Depending on your belief God, or Nature, has imparted upon every one of us the right to defend his life, family, property and his liberty, since these are the elements of preserving the component of life, each factor is rendered complete by the others, and none of them can be preserved without all of those rights. For what are our faculties, but the extension of our personality and what is property, but an extension of our faculties?

If a number of men have the right to combine together to extend, to organize a common force whose intention is to provide regularly for community defence, every other individual man has the right of defending, even by force, his personal life and family, his liberty, and his property. Logically, there is no difference the government derives its Rights from those who agree to be governed, if the people do not have that Right nor does the government. Yet, politicians, and police are protected and can have firearms and guards to protect themselves while the people are left defenceless.
Collective rights, only gain their principles, their reason for existing, their lawfulness, from the individual rights; and the common force cannot rationally have any other end, or any additional power. No more power than that of the isolated force of the individual as the governments, (Police, Army) are only a community group borrowing those same powers from the individuals and applying it for a community purpose.
Therefore, as the power within an individual cannot lawfully harm another person, the liberty, or the property of another individual for the same logical reason, the common force cannot lawfully be used to destroy the individual person, the liberty, or the property of individuals, or groups of individuals.
This corruption of force would be, in one case, as in any other, a contradiction to the whole proposition of what law is all about. Would a brave modern day politician dare to state that force has been given to government, not to defend the rights & property of the citizens, but to take their property, crush their freedoms and suppress their trade with one another? Unlikely, yet, that is the truth of what has been occurring regularly in nearly all countries of the western world. The helpless are in many stages of revolt, but mostly, by election they remove one party of robbers and elect another party to continue with the theft. We have to watch individual peoples You Tubes to see what is occurring in France and Britain on a weekly basis, as the mainstream media will spin their massive protests into ‘naughty people causing trouble again.

Every weekend in France. Seems this was how it was a 100 years ago.
Law and Security, Can we Have One without the Other?
Governments should be the organization that preserves the natural rights of good people, the defender of freedom as it is only the substitution of the collective drawn from the powers that naturally accrue from the individual. Government should support the individuals right to act in all functions, and enjoy all spheres in which their actions do not impact on the lives and property of their neighbours. If this is not true, and the power of defence is not drawn from the individual, where and how can the collective government force draw its power from? God, or the Devil or Microsoft? The collective force, police or army has its powers and the reason for its existence is to defend the individual citizens and the collective government force cannot lawfully claim more power than that is natural to the individual. They cannot rely on the maxim “Might is Right” surely Good Government means, “Right is Might”. Surely, nothing, can be more plainer than the evidence of the above. So again remember,”That a Good Government has a sacred duty to protect its citizens, when they fail to do this, the duty, not just the right, devolves to the Citizen themselves'”

What has gone wrong with Law and the Concept of Justice?
The Primary reason why mankind formed communities/governments and agreed to abide by the Rule of Law was for Defence and the Secondary reason was to appoint a government in which they could apply for Justice. However, the law has been perverted! The courts of parliament, the law courts, the police, and all the collective forces of the our nation have been gradually corrupted, not only diverted from their proper function, but have made the law pursue a function completely contrary to the good reasons that our forefathers, who banded together to initially form the government. Those brave individuals who formed governments to establish Law and Justice for the protection of the individuals and their families would be horrified to find that the Law has become the tool of every kind of rapacity, instead of the law controlling evil. The law is now guilty of every iniquity which in its inception it was commissioned to punish.

Taxation, or is it Really Government Plunder?
In its correct sense it is when a portion of wealth passes out of the hands of those who have acquired it, without their consent, and without compensation, and given to those who have not created it, whether by force or by ruse. Whenever a persons property is violated, plunder is perpetrated. Government theft, is still theft, collective theft is just as wrong, just as iniquitous as individual theft. It is absolutely essential that we all understand how wrong this extortion of taxation, (legalised plunder) is, as it is re-distributed to buy votes with welfare, and paying interest to the major Banks. The taxation/plunder by government breaks any faith in the ethical use of the Rule of Law, when the law legalises theft, how can there be any Justice. Which of these three principles should we live by?
1. When the few plunder the many?
2. When everybody plunders everybody else?
3. When nobody plunders anybody?
Partial plunder, universal plunder, absence of plunder, our choice has to be Justice for all and no plunder, that is the reason we banded together to form a government. The absence of plunder is the only principle of justice, peace, order, stability, conciliation, and of good sense that it is possible to support.
Can a citizen of Australia be Free or are we Slaves?
If for instance an individual man worked hard and prospered he most likely would appreciate the safety and security supplied by the community force and like tithings at church he most likely be willing to donate to its existence. Yet, if he suffered a great disadvantage, from a flood or a fire he would not consider taxing his local community and extorting the money from them on the threat that if they do not pay him he will destroy them and take everything they own. He would be considered a tyrant.
In comparison, the Modern State takes its own part in legalised theft, plunder or tax, and makes Laws to enforce the theft. Whenever the Modern Government suffer’s a disadvantage such as to pay its ever increasing politicians or staff, it has no scruples in demanding more wealth from the individuals and it uses its collective force to extort individuals into homeless destitution if they are unable to pay.
“They plunder, they slaughter, and they steal: this they falsely name Empire, and where they make a wasteland, they call it peace.”  Tacitus

The Object of Government has been Destroyed by its own Greed.
Modern government has acted in direct opposition to its proper goal, it has destroyed its own reason for its existence. Government theft, or extortion is just as unlawful as that committed by an individual, or a tyrant. Government has been employed in annihilating the Law which it was the reason it was established. It has removed the citizens Rights to own property, and the Right to defend that property against all comers. The Rule of Law which was governments true delegation to respect, has been replaced by politicians using the collective force of the State to plunder the wealth of the people and redistribute that wealth to the service of those who wish to benefit, without working for it and as its government theft, the people who have benefited most have not had to risk the lawful consequences such as their loss of liberty. Governments do not have absolute power, they have no power source that allows them to regulate our consciences, our ideas, our will, our education, our water our sentiments, our works, our trade, our gifts, our inheritance, our speech, our safety and our enjoyments.

Our governments have withdrawn Defence and Justice from the grasp of ordinary people, not just with their reversal of ‘law’ defending the criminal home invaders against the home defender, or the crazed mugger against the honest pedestrian with free legal aid and police that won’t prosecute as they do not want to appear ‘Racist’ or ‘Islamaphobic’. Governments, manufacture so many millions of pages of control legislation, using it as steel chains to enslave us all. Further to this, is that no longer can an individual either defend himself, or take a complaint to stand up for his Rights and Freedoms as the courts are a tight knit club that favours their own species. ‘Do It Yourself’ justice is not just discouraged but often the judges and courts are blatantly antagonistic to the citizen who cannot afford $500,000. to even begin to take on the government, or huge companies like banks or insurance companies. Again the law is used to overthrow Justice, leaving the individual defenceless.
Ignorance of Government Breeds Apathy and Allows the Government to Plunder.
Aldous Huxley, in his book, Brave New World, wrote of a citizenry of slaves who would love their enslavement. Huxley writes, “A really efficient totalitarian state would be one in which the all-powerful executive of political bosses and their army of managers control a population of slaves who do not have to be coerced, because they love their servitude.” This is precisely what our federal government has been trying to do to the Australian citizenry for decades now.
The recent Royal Commission into Banking is an insult to the use of the word Royal. It never exposed the major clearing house banks creation of debt, not just the individual’s debt that they manufacture to suit any loan that they need, but the government debt. Prior to 1921 the old Commonwealth Bank, set up by Prime Minister Andrew Fisher and MP King O Mally created the finance needed to build railroads to Western Australia and Northern Terroritry, they found the money to fight World War One without borrowing from the Major banks. That old system used the powers from the Commonwealth Constitution for the government to create credit on behalf of the individuals. After 1921 politicians, Traitors, sold that huge benefit to the major banks. Now when the government needs money to build a school it borrows it from one of the four major clearing house banks and uses a Treasury note to mortgage their ability to plunder the individuals wealth. They call this theft taxation and with this they pay the banks annual interest bill and borrow again for all their expenses. The Banks produce the government debt at no cost, but you and I, have to provide real wealth, wealth that we have worked for, to pay the government extortionists. The Banks in turn pay huge amounts into the Major parties election funds which again cost them nothing. For a 100 years Politicians, Traitors and Bankers have enslaved us all in chains of debt and taxes. That fraudulent use of the public credit decreases our meagre savings and builds a mountian of debt that our grandchildren will be paying for. They hold out carrots of welfare and import more slaves, who will vote for welfare. If the major plundering parties succeed in gaining a majority in both houses it won’t be a case of asking the last one to leave Australia to turn the lights off, as we won’t be able to afford to turn them on, nor will we be able to afford to leave, we will be minority in our own country bled white, left waiting for the tiny thread holding Damocles sword to break.
There is no Spring without Winter, without Mistakes there is no Learning. There is no Life without Death, without Doubts there is no Faith. There is no Peace without War, without Fear there is no Courage. For without Mistakes, Doubts and Fears there are no pathways to Wisdom.
Ron Owen.
———–
Any Inquiries on any products phone 07 54824099 or 07 54825070 or email owenguns@spiderweb.com.au


Monday, May 21, 2018

Ron Owen's thoughts For The Week. Australian citizen's rights & freedoms.


Does anyone else besides me, see the insanity of voting for a government, that takes our money, (Taxes are theft) to buy guns and give them to men, who will come and take our guns from us? So they can extort even more money and property from us?

“The reason why men enter into society is the preservation of their property.” John Locke
So why do we put up with this system?
We do not have a 2nd Amendment, but we do have A Bill of Rights and our Monarch is Bound by Oath to uphold it.

British Funny Hat Championships keep the plebs happy.
Royal Weddings are just diversions to placate the masses, a fancy hat competition, while it reminds thinkers that the keeper of our “Rights and Privileges” who swears to uphold them in the Coronation Oath is not doing her job. Our Constitutions State and Federal gives the Queen the power to disallow all State and Federal Legislation that contravenes her Coronation Oath to preserve the peoples Rights and Privileges.
Commonwealth Constitution of Australia Act 9th July 1900.
Disallowance by the Queen.
59. The Queen may disallow any law within one year from the Governor-General’s assent, and such disallowance on being made known by the Governor-General by speech or message to each of the Houses of the Parliament, or by Proclamation, shall annul the law from the day when the disallowance is so made known.
The legal obligations surrounding the Coronation Oath are set out in Halsbury’s Laws of England.
“28. The Crown’s duty towards the subject. The essential duties of the Crown towards the subject are now to be found expressed in the terms of the oaths which every monarch is required to take before or at the Coronation. The duties imposed by the coronation oath are:
(1) to govern the peoples of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, and the dominions etc belonging or pertaining to them according to their respective laws and customs;
(2) to cause law and justice in mercy to be executed in all judgments, to the monarch’s power;
it is declared that ‘whereas the laws of England are the birthright of the people thereof and all the kings and queens who shall ascend the throne of this realm ought to administer the government of the same according to the said laws and all their officers and ministers ought to serve them respectively according to the same…the same are….ratified and confirmed accordingly.”
Bill of Rights s 1; Act of Settlement, Magna Carta of 1215.
The Bill of Rights 1689, first listed the wrongs,
“by causing Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;” then proclaimed the right to address that problem.
“Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law;”
Which in effect gave that right to all who were law abiding.
As the Monarch of the day has disallowed parliamentary legislation in the past why did this not occur with the legislation that in effect stole those rights from us all.
It was not that shooters were a minority, at present over 20% of the electorate, it was because we were complacent, we left it to someone else to defend our rights, our placid conservatism silenced our rage. Yes, some of us, not even 1 % walked down the streets of our capitals, and even less wrote a letter of dissatisfaction, then nearly all handed in firearms, some even handed in all they had and walked away. Falsely believing that is would not effect them, so why worry about it.
We lost our property, we lost our pride and we lost the right to defend our families and property. As I knew many years ago that disarmament of the people was not a public safety issue, or misinformed politicians, that it followed and international agenda to suit people who wanted control of all systems of power.

In the 1980s I was called a Conspiracy Theorist,
In the 1990s I was a Fear Monger,
In the 2000s I was an Agitator
In the two thousand teens I am called a prophesier. Like the original Cassandra, I too was cursed to utter prophecies which were true but which no one believed.
A hundred years ago we were free to own property, when land was purchased you owned the land, the sky above it and the soil below it to the centre of the earth. You owned the water that fell on it and the water below it. You owned the timber on it and the gold under it, All property was sacrosanct, inviolable, impregnable, bomb proof, religion defended it and the law guaranteed it. They hanged horse thieves and any sort of property theft was going to deserve a fate sometimes worse than death transportation. You could lawfully kill anyone who was attempting to steal your property.
I can remember 40 years ago thinking, the world has been turned up side, but never really grasped the idea, that free people could fall so far into the cess pit of socialism. I can remember a work mate telling me before long that the government would do anything for money, that before long they would legalise all gambling, they  would tax the casino’s, that they would legalise prostitution and run the brothels, that they would legalise the drugs and sell them cheaper than cigarettes. Not quite on the drugs yet but they are handing them out for free. It looks like my mates prophecy will be true, but will we care?
“Whoever owns the soil, holds title all the way up to the heavens and down to the depths of hell”.
Originally, the common law position was that the minerals belonged to the landowner: they were regarded as an inherent product of the land itself. The common law assumed that the person who owned the land owned not only the surface of the earth, but also the space above that surface and the soil below that surface.We are now conquered slaves, but knowing that public safety was Not the reason for the imposition of firearm restrictions made some of us think about the real reason that governments were so desperate to impose their firearm controls.

Look now, See what we have all lost, and yes ‘All of us have lost’, the media tells us that farmers have lost the right to clear vegetation from their own land, so the farmers, like firearm owners, are isolated by the media and the politicians they are the only ones affected, it does not affect you Mr and Mrs Average, but it does, and the loss for one property right affects us all. Not just in the price of food and its production but in the loss of your property rights when its your turn for the government to take what’s yours.
‘No Man is an Island’
No man is an island entire of itself; every man
is a piece of the continent, a part of the main;
if a clod be washed away by the sea, Europe
is the less, as well as if a promontory were, as
well as any manner of thy friends or of thine
own were; any man’s death diminishes me,
because I am involved in mankind.
And therefore never send to know for whom
the bell tolls; it tolls for thee.
John Donne 1624 AD.
No one really protested with Peter Spencer who perched himself on a wind-monitoring mast on his Shannon’s Flat property north of Cooma and went on a hunger strike in 2009.

He was an individual who fought for compensation for not being allowed to clear his property under NSW native vegetation laws and accurately warned that this would eventually affect every farmer in Australia. Well he was right.
He told the press that he would not eat or come down until the then Prime Minister Kevin Rudd would admit that the Australian Government owes farmers like him $100 billion for capturing carbon in their vegetation that they have lost the use of due to land clearing bans.
Mr Spencer said the farmers’ case was like the Government coming to a $1 million suburban home in Canberra and taking three quarters of its equity to fund services. That was a warning but the rest of the people did nothing, just got on with making the most out of what they have, until the government steals their property rights. Just the same as they ignored the law abiding firearm owners. Mr Spencer lasted 53 days and had an eviction notice from the government a few days later.
“The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out… without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane, intolerable.” H. L. Mencken
Same with water, we ignored the warnings of farmers being licenced to pay for the water in their own Dams, not just water pumped from a creek or river, but water that falls from the sky on their own property. The next attack on property rights came to our attention in July 2017 when a levy was introduced by the Adelaide and Mount Lofty Ranges Natural Resources Management (NRM) Board in the Western Mount Lofty Ranges. (WMLR)
The amount charged for the levy is calculated according to how much water each farmer is allowed to use under their licence, not how much water they actually use. This must be paid on top of having their Dam water licenced.
Wording on the bills says failure to pay for the levy within 90 days may result in debt collectors being sent. Any farmers refusing or unable to pay the levy will be obliged to relinquish their licence. Farmers have 90 days to pay before debt recovery action is initiated

Seventeen independent Fleurieu farmers in the dairy, beef and horticulture industries protested but where were the farmers from the rest of South Australia or the rest of Australia as this sort of cancer spreads quickly.
In South Australia, the state government claims that a person’s roof is the same thing as “land”. Under section 124 of the Natural Resources Management Act 2004, water flowing over land is surface water, and rights to surface water are vested in the state.
National water policy is embodied in the National Water Initiative Agreement. Clause 2 of the Agreement says, “In Australia, water is vested in governments that allow other parties to access and use water for a variety of purposes”. The Federal Government claims that rainwater falling on roofs is vested in governments.
On February 27, 2007, the state government released its “runoff policy” for surface water in surface water prescribed areas. A “water user” capturing rainwater in excess of 500 kilolitres requires a water licence, and then may be eligible to pay a water based levy if that water is used for commercial purposes. The policy applies to rainwater tanks, on the presumption that water collected from roofs for rainwater tanks in South Australia is “surface water”.
“If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there’d be ashortage of sand.” Milton Friedman
Same too with the mineral rights under the ground, this was the property of the owner and of special interest to me as beneath Gympie is a huge bed of Coal that goes up the coast as far as Bundaberg with that coal is a huge deposit of Shale Oil and Gas, when diesel fuel is reaching $1.50 a litre and I know that I’m sitting on deposit of fuel that is worth more than any lottery win in the world, I know its 450 metres below the surface but I want to drill down and use that oil and gas to run my vehicle and alleviate my electricity bills. As it is now, the State and Federal Governments make billions more out of the increased taxation percentage from the higher prices. The longer the people’s resources stay in the ground, un utilised the higher the prices go. Fuel Diesel and petrol have been manufactured from Coal since the beginning of the 20 century and in the 1940s Coal was supplying 91 % of Germany’s engine fuel. The process of making Diesel from Coal was first developed when Rudolph Diesel was pioneering the Diesel engine. Standard Oil (Rockefeller’s) sold the process of manufacturing petrol to IG Farben in the 1930s. It is just a different refining process and we have vast amounts of coal to use and ultimately that resource belongs to the individuals that own the land that above it.
Originally, the common law position was that the minerals belonged to the landowner: they were regarded as an inherent product of the land itself. The common law assumed that the person who owned the land owned not only the surface of the earth, but also the space above that surface and the soil below that surface.
Your property used to be your Castle.
Australians rightly perceived their homes as their Castle, and this was represented in the movie The Castle, as the Kerrigan family fought attempts by the government to resume their land in order to expand the airport. This view of a man’s land as his castle harks back to the origins of Common Law and it was acknowledged by the 17th Century Jurist Lord Coke who pronounced that ‘Everyone is to him as his Castle and Fortress’.. In doing so, the landowner essentially enjoys a right to exclude any person from entering his land. This common law position a landowner’s right to control those who enter his land over land has been altered by statute in all jurisdictions in Australia, granting the Crown the right to reserve ownership and control over petroleum (including Coal Seam Gas) and minerals. The case Plenty v Dillon confirmed in law that a landholder has a right to exclude others from entering their land as a trespasser. This case involved a successful action for trespass brought by a landowner against two police officers who entered premises without consent. The High Court of Australia concluded the landowner did not grant an implied consent to the police offers to enter the premises, and therefore held that the police officers were trespassing.

Under common law, landowners owned sub-surface minerals and could prevent anyone from excavating them; as doing so would constitute a trespass. The only qualification was the right of the Crown to extract gold and silver, characterised by the common law as “Royal Minerals”.
Most landowners in Australia presume that they have absolute ownership over their land, and therefore the right to refuse others from coming onto their land. Given the common law position regarding rights over land, and the concept of trespass to land that was reinforced by Plenty v Dillon, landholders mistakenly presume that they have the right to exclude petroleum companies from entering their land. This common law position was, however, significantly limited when specific State legislation vested the ownership of minerals contained within the soil of private landholdings in the Crown.
In Victoria, the Mines Resource (Sustainable Development) Act 1990 (Vic) states that the Crown owns all minerals (with a few small exemptions). Similar provisions exist in other states.
This statutory vesting means private landowners no longer control the minerals in their sub-surface soil, even though they continue to own the land itself. As owner of the minerals, the Crown is legally entitled to grant exploratory or mining licences to mining companies, allowing companies to explore for or extract sub-surface minerals. The effect of this process upon private landholdings is often devastating.
This legislation is known as a Crown reservation in respect of minerals and petroleum. Queensland – Crown rights over Coal Seam Gas under the land In Queensland, this reservation is outlined in section 27 of the Petroleum and Gas (Production and Gas) 2004 (Qld) (PGPGA), which notes that a Crown grant is taken to contain a reservation to the state of all petroleum on or below the surface, and the exclusive right to undertake petroleum activities of to authorize others to undertake petroleum activities. Furthermore, section 26 of the PGPGA states that petroleum is the property of the State, and a person does not acquire any property in relation to the property irrespective of whether the property is freehold or leasehold. Therefore, under the concept of Crown reservation, the Crown in Queensland owns all of the petroleum under the land, and has the right to take the petroleum or grant a title to another in order to explore for and/or produce petroleum, including coal seam, or shale gas. This means that under the system of law in Australia, the Queensland government can allow separate interests to be held over a single property. This concept, known as fragmentation of property rights, means that the land can be owned by a farmer as a freehold interest, yet entitle a petroleum company to hold a title that allows it to enter the property to search for and produce gas. Australia is not the United States The position in the United States regarding minerals ownership and Crown reservation differs to the Australia. In the US, the development of onshore gas resources operates under a system of private ownership of resources, known as the law of capture. Under the US system of land tenure, a landowner has absolute ownership over his land (known as allodial title). This includes ownership over all of the resources (including petroleum) that lie under the land he owns. In the USA since the landowner owns all of the resources under his land, he has the right to accept or refuse offers from a company to develop these onshore gas resources.
Can see from the above that firearm ownership is tied to freedom, and the ownership of property. If the Americans ignore their Rights under the Second Amendment as we have in Australia and Britain they could expect to lose all remaining Rights as we have.
Can we see that our American cousins are Free and we are Slaves?
Do we have a government that sees us as property?
Are we just ‘Tax Produces’ who barely own the breath in our lungs?
Remember my opening questions,
“Does anyone else besides me, see the insanity of voting for a government, that takes our money, (Taxes are theft) to buy guns and give them to men, who will come and take our guns from us? So they can extort even more money and property from us?
We need an Oliver Cromwell not to remove the system that has served free people for hundreds of years, but an Oliver that could make a Monarch follow their Coronation Oath, and sacking a tyrannical parliament with the words.
“Mr. Speaker. May I have your permission to address this assembly? By all means, sir. My lords, honourable members… …I have always desired, above my life, a free Parliament… …sitting by the authority of the good people of this nation. A Parliament open and visible, to be seen by all men. Instead of uniting the good people of this nation… …with righteousness and peace… …which would have been a glorious and Christian thing to have done… …what do I find? Anarchy, corruption… …division and dissatisfaction. I say that the enemies of this nation… …have flourished under your protection. You were from the beginning a provisional government… …not truly representative of the people. For have the people elected you? Has this House gone once to the people it purports to represent? No, it has not! And after six years of misgovernment, what do we find? Sir Thomas Fairfax moves a bill to give this House a further lease… …of its worthless and dishonourable life! Gentlemen, an immovable Parliament is more obnoxious… …than an immovable king! You are drunkards, tricksters, villains, whoremasters… …godless, self-seeking, ambitious tricksters. You are no more capable of conducting the nation’s affairs… …than you are of running a brothel! You are scum, sir. And not truly elected scum at that. This is no Parliament. I shall put an end to it. I hereby declare this Parliament dissolved! – Colonel Harrison! – Yes, sir. Troops forward! (Speech from the movie Cromwell)
Oliver we need another Oliver.
With yet another school shooting in the USA we will be assaulted by the anti gun and anti freedom paparazzi we will have to feed the chickens, yet again with truth. These links will assist.
Don’t forget to mention where Gun Control Australia, Get Back and the Open Society and the friends of the ABC and SBS get their funds from. Its foreign intervention of the politics of our country, this socialistic support that has worked away like white ants, deviously destroying the wishes and aspirations of the Australian people. This link concerns Florida but his money via his foundation organisations syphon money from the International Mega Corporation through to Unions and the Australian Labor Party and the Greens. The Genesis for these international agenda are the big banks and oil companies that rule the world. They want to ensure that resources stay in the ground, they want us all on the world wage, they want no country boundaries. They want us poor and defenceless so that they can exploit what was once our resources without any interruptions.

Minutemen volunteers facing off British soldiers who had orders to disarm them, on Lexington Common, Massachusetts, in the first battle in the War of Independence, 19th April 1775. Original artist William Barnes Wollen.
After the above event Patrick Henry made a statement that has resounded though the centuries.
“They tell us, sir, that we are weak; unable to cope with so formidable an adversary. But when shall we be stronger? Will it be the next week, or the next year? Will it be when we are totally disarmed, and when a British guard shall be stationed in every house? Shall we gather strength by irresolution and inaction? Shall we acquire the means of effectual resistance by lying supinely on our backs and hugging the delusive phantom of hope, until our enemies shall have bound us hand and foot? Sir, we are not weak if we make a proper use of those means which the God of nature hath placed in our power.” “Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery? Forbid it, Almighty God! I know not what course others may take; but as for me, give me liberty or give me death!”
There is no Spring without Winter, without Mistakes there is no Learning. There is no Life without Death, without Doubts there is no Faith. There is no Peace without War, without Fear there is no Courage. For without Mistakes, Doubts and Fears there are no pathways to Wisdom.
Ron Owen

http://www.owenguns.com/ad-category/used-guns/


Friday, December 18, 2015

Treason In High Places. A Facebook Post.


The Geopolitical Dynamics have changed as I have been posting for years, but now its mainstream news - the shoe is on the other foot!!! China, Russia, Iran and the other BRICS nations now Rule the future!!! The Rothschilds UK/USA/Euro Axis Is Finished - Isolated!!!
Iran has banned all USA Products LOL LOL LOL I LOVE IT!!!
The Anglo Euro/UK/USA is a Walking Dead Beast!!!
Dear Traitors in Parliament Houses across Australia, I can not wait to watch your demise you pathetic Criminals masquerading like Public Servants!!! YOUR FUCKED !!!!
I do not pity you at all - Your All heading to the Hague - by 2020 Australian Politicians will be paraded across all world news networks as the criminals they really are, along with the scum from the UK & USA!!! LOL LOL LOL
If the Aussies do not rise up with me and help me take legal action Now against our criminal unlawful government then we Aussies will be looked very bad upon by the world in years to come!!! Same go's for the British and American People!!!!
This is about correcting the past and present injustices and securing the future for all people who call this great land home!
“Australian Government Is Officially Illegal”
The recent attempts by the Tasmania State Government to amend Laws to ensure validity was a poor effort to hide the facts and legal errors of the past, but more important it shows something is not right!
In April 2015, the Tasmania GOVERNMENT oversight has cast a question mark over the appointment of the state’s magistrates, coroners and justices of the peace. In fact, this oversight applies to all state's of Australia!
Under the 1869 Promissory Oaths Act, all magistrates, coroners and justices of the peace are required to take the judicial oath tendered by the Clerk of the Executive Council and taken in the presence of the Governor or the Chief Justice or another judge of the Supreme Court.
The requirement has not been followed for 30 years.
Attorney-General Vanessa Goodwin assured the public that criminal convictions and jail sentences were still valid despite the error.
The oversight was discovered recently and the Government has promised urgent legislation to fix the loophole.
Valid Law and Government Does Not Exist In Australia, and has been noted in the UK Parliament and at the UN.
It is important to note, China has followed the legal process under international law to acquire a large part of Australia's infrastructure, including; public transport, shipping ports, major farms and much more!
On 30 October 1943, following a conference between China, the USSR, the United Kingdom and the United States, a joint declaration was issued recognizing the necessity “of establishing at the earliest practicable date a general international organization, based on the principle of the sovereign equality of all peace-loving States, and open to membership by all such States, large and small, for the maintenance of international peace and security”.
This declaration led to exchanges between the Four Powers at Dumbarton Oaks, resulting in the publication on 9 October 1944 of proposals for the establishment of a general international organization, to include an international court of justice, which later was set-up in the Hague.
In the United Nations General Assembly and Security Council, the International Court of Justice was officially formed by May 1947.
So, China has a legal stake in Australia and is a major share-holder protected under international law.
All Australian laws assented to on behalf of a British Monarch, by any non-legally appointed Governor-General of Australia since 1919, cannot hold any valid or legal executive authority, as all of the Governor-Generals appointments have been issued incorrectly.
The “Old Colonial” defunct British Constitutional law, used and applied as the basis of all law in Australia, has held no valid authority in law since 1919.
The Australian people will have to finish off what Prime Minister William Morris-Hughes set out to achieve in 1919. A “new” ALL-Australian Constitution will have to be created and voted in by the people for the people.
Australians at long last, will have the opportunity to have their say, on how they wish to be governed and taxed. British lawyers are already saying, “that a legal picnic is about to unfold.”
Those who have deliberately concealed the truth from the Australian people, will one day be called upon to answer for their actions - in the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ), Hague.
“Australian Government Is Officially Illegal”.
The Australia of today has sadly lost the liberty of yesteryears. The government has not been the government of the people, consequently, the employed have become the disemployed, our industries have been moved offshore, our farmers have been forced off their land, the peoples utilities have been handed over to private investment, our wealth has been exported, the foreign debt hangs like a millstone around the neck of each Australian present and future, our very means of livelihood has been legislated away!
To learn that to become a Member of the Federal Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia is to commit an act of treason against the sovereign people of Australia will no doubt result in a reaction of incredulity.
In fact it would be reasonable to anticipate that the reader of such a statement would be inclined to immediately reject this without further examination.
Similarly, the bold assertion that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 is invalid at first appears ludicrous. As the fundamental law of the Australian Nation, if it were invalid, then all Australian Governments - Commonwealth, State and Territorial - have no legal basis for their continued existence, no valid authority to pass and enforce legislation, and no authority to enter contracts or bind the Australian people by Treaty.
The consequences could be catastrophic, both within Australia and internationally. Yet, the consequences should not influence a disinterested analysis of the basis of that situation.
The fundamental facts which give rise to the accuracy of the above statements are indeed simple and were succinctly stated a few years ago by the late Professor G. Clements (an eminent UK QC and emeritus Professor in law at Cambridge). He summed up the situation thus;
"The continued usage of the Australian Constitution Act (UK) by the Australian Governments and the judiciary is a confidence trick of monstrous proportions played upon the Australian people with the intent of maintaining power. It remains an Act of the United Kingdom. After joining the League of Nations in 1919 Australia became a sovereign nation. It had no further legal power to use, alter or otherwise tamper with another nation’s legislation. 
Authority over the Australian Constitution Act lies not with the Australian government nor with the Australian people, it rests solely with the UK. Only they have the authority to repeal this legislation".
In other words, every Member and Senator in Australian Parliament has committed an Act of treason by swearing and subscribing to an oath to serve the government of a power foreign to Australia.

Despite all the above, our Australian dictator government is still in power & unless something drastic happens, they are likely to stay in power. The majority of Australians are too apathetic & really don't give a damn so long as they themselves are doing okay. The poor of Australia have no connection, no rallying point. Slowly but surely our rights & freedoms are being taken away from us. The Australian police service no longer represents & helps the average Australian citizen & many are just as corrupt as the government. Soon we will have no human rights left, no right to protest, no right to rally. The government is very keen to disarm the Australian public & at the same time doing nothing to curb crime. So called "Terrorism" is being used as a public scare tactic & used to justify further restrictions on our freedoms. Personally I think Australia & its citizens are STUFFED!!!

Saturday, September 5, 2015

Australia's Prime Minister Tony Abbott Does Not Speak For The Average Australian Citizen.

If you think that we the Australian people are still living in a democratic society, ask yourself this; When was the last time this government gave the Australian people a choice by referendum?!

Sunday, June 14, 2015

BANKS SCAMMING THE UNEXPECTED HOME OWNER:


BANKS SCAMMING THE UNEXPECTED HOME OWNER:
BANKRUPT BANKS BAILING OUT BANKRUPT BANKS!
NAB, WESTPAC, RAMS,
GE MONEY......
When will the courts and politicians uphold the rights of "The People"?
This is based on my own personal experience.
Just so you all know, when terminating a loan, the loan STOPS on the day of payout; no further interest can be added to it, the early payout is a minimal fee and holds no future interest as l clearly pointed out to AGC when we went to pay out our car loan with them and they tried to add interest charges for the remaining years of the loan; which totalled in their opinion one third of what the vehicle originally cost us $9k, they were very quick to change it back when l brought this FACT to their attention.
Another thing they do to people who have had their houses repossessed is they come back after the house is auctioned and demand the amount that the home did not reach to cover the loan.
1. The banks took possession of their home (as clearly stated in loan contracts), therefore, it is their home to sell it for whatever price they are happy to accept, any shortfall DOES NOT come back to the mortgage payer (if they choose to flog the house off for less than it's worth).
Whose choice is it to accept the auctioned figure?
Whose responsibility is it?
If you said the banks; you are right.
2. Let's say THEY sell your house for $40k less than is owing.
When ANYONE purchases a home you have to pay Mortgage Insurance, the bank uses your original deposit (which is now up to 40% of the price of the home) the bank uses this money to take out Mortgage Insurance, which covers the Home Owner in the event that your home is repossessed, the mortgage is then paid out by the Mortgage Insurance Company (The Banks NEVER miss out) and they NEVER loan money without taking that insurance out and if they do then that is on their shoulders not yours as the Bank still own the home until the day you pay it off (that is stated in every contract)
RAMS, NAB and most other lending institutes are scamming their home owners. Below are links showing they are adding interest for years beyond the loan and calling it early payout.
After VR remove this corrupt government from Parliament (let it be known) that our sights will be set on Australian Banks and
l personally will be coming after RAMS and their fraudulent RHG. During the Global Financial Crisis, RAMS went bankrupt on their debtors (paying out their loans at less than the amount borrowed) by transferring current home loan lenders to their debtors as payment.
Then still while in the bankruptcy process they registered another arm of RAMS and called it RHG and transferred the remaining home loans into their new RHG arm. While ALL other banks interest rates plummeted to 3.5 to 4% interest for current Home Loans; RHG increased current home loan interest rates from 6.5% up to 10.5% and left them there; making it impossible for most home lenders to finance out of RAMS.
RAMS have been taken to court by many people in class actions and they won; with settlements paid from RAMS/RHG; however, the courts knowing the fraud RAMS and RHG have committed have not extended the judgements to current Home Loan Owners still trapped in RAMS Web of Fraud.
WE "The People" cannot go bankrupt on our debtors and move our Assets to another Party or Bank or the Authorities claw it back; so why are the judges and authorities allowing this to happen just because it's a RAMS Home Loan Lending Group/Bank or Institution!
Just a few short years later RAMS Home Loans are back in the lending game leaving a path of destruction and devastation behind them; unchecked by authorities and judges alike and with politicians preparing reports and senate enquiries based on RAMS and other lending institutes and their fraudulent dealings; but nothing being done by politicians to ease the burden on Home Owners; while on the other hand, giving tax payer bailouts to Mortgage Lenders in order for them to continue their fraudulent lending scams.
RAMS Goes Bankrupt:
At no stage did Home Loan Borrowers RECEIVE NOTICE FROM RAMS that this was happening or of their intentions (not even until this day), notice is a requirement by Law!
RAMS FAIL AT AUCTION:
Rams Home Loans Fails to Refinance $5 Billion of Debt (Update8)
By Laura Cochrane - August 16, 2007 05:44 EDT
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news…
RAMS ROUTED AS MORTGAGE MELTDOWN HITS CRISIS:
http://www.abc.net.au/pm/content/2007/s2005060.htm
Australia and the Global Financial Crisis:
http://www.stubbornmule.net/2008/10/australia-and-the-gfc/
Overview of the post-GFC banking environment:
http://www.aph.gov.au/…/20…/post_GFC_banking/report/c02.ashx
SECRET BAILOUT:
2008 & 2009: Secret funds are secured from the Federal Reserve of USD$1.09 billion. (see Secret Bailout 2007 & 2008)
http://www.moneymorning.com.au/…/nab-and-westpacs-secret-ba…
RAMS goes to Westpac while RHG is left behind to Screw Home Owners by almost tripling interest rate charges and pumping up exit fees.
Two of Australia's financial pillars (Westpac) and NAB borrow funds in a SECRET BAILOUT from The Federal Reserve to buy out Bankrupt Banks! This stinks of FRAUD!
QUOTE:
"RAMS Home Loans has trouble with funding at the end of 2007 due to the credit crunch. This led to a dramatic fall in share price that gave Westpac an opportunity to forward an offer, which they did. The following January, the transaction went through, with Westpac paying $140 million for RAMS' distribution business. The latter was comprised of 99 stores that were owned and run by 54 franchisees. While the acquisition did not include RAMS Home Loans Group as a whole or the company's mortgage book, Westpac purchased the 'RAMS' brand. This meant that what was left of the company had to change its name to RHG.
However, this was not the end for RHG. In February 2008, they made a deal with the National Australia Bank (NAB) and sold them home loans worth approximately $1 billion. NAB had previously been the company's banker. While RHG continued to manage these mortgages until April 2009, these loans were transferred to Anchorage Home Loans management. Anchorage Home Loans is a subsidiary that is fully owned by NAB.
Ever since it changed its name, RHG has had a lot of bad press. The company was involved in a very public test case legal action that was led by the Consumer Action Law Centre for Emily Hamilton regarding exit fees. Hamilton stated that she had to pay early termination fees that were too high to refinance her mortgage, despite the fact that RHG increased interest rates well above the RBA's headline rate and significantly in excess of what the rest of the market has done.
A confidential settlement was reached in January 2009, but the Consumer Action Law Centre claimed that they had been contacted by approximately 100 other people claiming they had similar problems with RHG.
However, the problems didn't end here. Sometime around the middle of 2012, ASIC had to intervene after receiving a significant degree of complaints. The result was that more than 6,400 customers received refunds totalling more than $3.3 million representing early termination and discharge fees. RHG also agreed to lower its discharge fees on the loans it already held and to remove early termination fees in a staggered manner.
Clients weren't the only ones who were displeased. Towards the end of 2009, a group of shareholders voiced their displeasure, demanding that a board member be removed from their position. They also wanted improved communication and a higher return on their investment. As if that wasn't enough, the company's creditors weren't all that happy either, which led to RHG being the target of numerous court proceedings.
In regards to RAMS, at the beginning of 2010, Westpac decreased the size of the RAMS Home Loan business. The result was that financial products under the RAMS brand name were only available to customers via RAMS franchisees and the lending conditions became much stricter.
Compare RAMS home loans.
Back to top"
END QUOTE:
(Relevance at the bottom of this article)
QUOTE:
"Mark Bouris, now famous for hosting the popular Australian spin-off of The Apprentice, created Wizard in 1996 — a home loan lender. It was sold in 2004 to GE Money. Subsequently, in 2008, GE Money was in negotiations to sell Wizard to NAB but a better offer from Aussie saw Wizard going to the latter. GE Money's goal was to remove itself from the home lending market in the area.
The ACCC approved the acquisition on the 24th of February, 2009 and, three days later, Wizard's broking business came under new ownership.
The sale of Wizard also saw $4 billion of prime loans that were previously funded by Wizard going to CBA. The loans that CBA did not buy remained with GE Money and were rebranded as AMS Mortgage Services loans because the Wizard name was now owned by Aussie. AMS Mortgage Services is a GE Money subsidiary.
GE Money let home loan holders know that any mortgages they held would continue to be services as normal. However, they also let home loan holders know that they would not be able to ignore the serious rate cuts the RBA were making as some other lenders were doing and if their customers wanted to refinance through Aussie to go to another lender, they would not be required to pay a Deferred Administration Fee. Waiving this fee was an Aussie requirement when they purchased the Wizard home loans business.
While these certainly won't be the last movements we see in the banking sector, they were the most notable of recent years. Further concentration of banking ownership is inevitable.
So, don't be surprised if you receive a letter telling you that your current bank has come under new ownership. Australian banks are more profitable than ever. More than ever, they have the cash to act on their expansion ambitions. So it is no surprise that the ownership conquests as outlined above have occurred. Nor is that the end of their expansionary moves.
Regardless, banks will continue to buy each other out and merge with each other as it suits them to acquire greater market share and more power, but that is simply the nature of the beast.
Let us just hope that these mergers and buyouts can occur to the benefit of Australian consumers and not the our detriment."
END QUOTE:
At least this is LIE they are standing by!
Australia need a True People's Bank, that is here in the interest of "The People", VELVET REVOLUTION are looking into the establishment of such a bank!
But first we must REMOVE this corrupt Government that allows this FRAUD to continue!
VELVET REVOLUTION
MARCH DATE 10th of July 2015:
Meeting in Every City across the Nation of Australia.
Our First Major Town so far is Traralgon in Gippsland.
If you want to MARCH in your town please contact us so we can help you set it up.
VELVET - means Non Violent
Please join our group and share everything you receive from "VELVET REVOLUTION".
For more FACT SHEETS and further information you can contact us via:
EMAIL: lyn.bennetts7@gmail.com
Regards
Lyn Bennetts
National Organiser of
VELVET REVOLUTION
And our Brilliant VR TEAM
UNITED WE STAND SIDE by SIDE AGAINST Tyranny, Fraud, Treason and Political Corruption!