The Greatest Lie in Australia

Thoughts for The Week by Ron Owen of Owen Guns.

Thoughts For The Week.

“As in nature, politics abhors a power vacuum.”
History has shown that weak, undefended countries are short lived experiences, until filled by a more violent power.
“We have between two and three years to go, before we have a major confrontation with China.”
History through the ages is littered with examples of Australia’s current demise. The pages of history prove to us that when presented with a power vacuum: there will arise a force; a country and Empire which will try to fill that void. History also shows that the force will be sinister. A force that will take away your liberty, your property, your happiness, and ultimately your life. I have seen the modern examples in my own lifetime, in the form of Communism, and have second generation knowledge of the scourge of Fascism in Nazi Germany, Italy, and the Imperial designs of the Japanese empire. Only 1 in a 100 examples are power voids filled by a benign power and China does not have a record of being benign.

Anson Chan, the former chief secretary of Hong Kong, occupied a position of trust unique in history. She was the last head of the Hong Kong civil service under the British and the first under the Chinese. She served four years under each, evidence that both powers trusted her impartiality and professionalism.
“I don’t think Australians understand the sort of country they’re dealing with. Look at the way they are infiltrating, even in Australia,” she said during a visit to Melbourne in 2016. “Australia is a very open society, so it wouldn’t occur to most people the designs of the one-party state. And it wouldn’t have occurred to the people of Hong Kong until we experienced it first-hand. No one should be under any illusions about the objective of the Communist Party leadership: it’s long-term, systematic infiltration of social organisations, media and government. By the time China’s infiltration of Australia is readily apparent, it will be too late.”

We’ve seen the pattern throughout history, with the empires, monarchies and savagery of forces seeking to conquer their known world, Babylonians, Greeks, Egyptians, Romans, Saxons, Danes, Norman, Mongols, the Spanish Armada, Napoleon, National Socialism, Hitler, Japanese Imperialism, Communism, Lenin and now Chinese Communism. They all have to try, as they know that if they fail to take an area someone else will fill the void. Power always seeks the ultimate in power. The opportunists are always rewarded, but not all win, some ultimately fail, but all leave behind them a total devastation, battlefields, personal human losses that in every instance the surviving common folk have to deal with until the next tyrant comes along. If there are any survivors at all.

Our Current Appeaser.
China’s ‘game-changing’ position will ‘reset the world order’, PM Scott Morrison says. China’s increased influence needed to be understood in terms of its rise.
“China in our lifetime has gone from a developing country, one of not great economic size or scale and not a large military, to the second biggest economy in the world with one of the largest militaries,” he said. “So it’s obviously been the game-changing country of our era and our generation. That’s obviously going to reset the world order. “We just need to understand that in its context. They’re a much bigger country than they used to be with much more influence, and that’s just something the system has to absorb and adapt to.”
Asked if the average Australian should be worried about China, he said “worry is not the word”.

Would “Petrified” be more of an honest response?
Is he mentally retarded, or is he a paid traitor for the Chinese like some of our other parliamentarians? Could he really be that blind to Chinese intentions.
Since 1949 China’s policy has been a never-ending pursuit of power, the relentlessly expanding influence and paranoid nature of the Chinese Communist Party invaded Korea, Tibet, Mongolia, East Turkestan, India, Vietnam means that it will continue to press outwards unless and until it meets resistance. It would be in Taiwan in a heart beat and is bursting to suppress Hong Kong. It has invaded Philippine’s Territory in the South China Sea and the world has done nothing. It has invaded Australian Antarctic Territory and Australia has not even asked them to leave. At home and abroad, it imposes one control after another until it is satisfied that it has total control. It is an ideology of authoritarianism animated by a psychology of totalitarianism.

The Appeasers are Sedated by this sort of Nonsense.

1. “No China can’t invade Australia.
China cannot break out of the first Island Chain or successfully invade Taiwan with a guarantee of success let alone Australia.”
Answer. The USA is not going to risk losing half its major cities to Chinese Ballistic Missiles to save Australia, South Korea, or Taiwan, or the Philippines. Once the threat of Nuclear War with the USA is removed, or fully cancelled Taiwan will not last a week.

2. “The distances are massive, 9,000km to Sydney, let alone Melbourne, Adelaide and the interior. China’s long supply lines can be easily interdicted by naval and air forces.”
Answer . China no longer has long supply lines it has bases all around us. Besides the South China Sea bases it has these as marked on the map.

3. “The forces required to invade Australia and secure it, are massive. Think of the Germans invading the USSR, Australia has great depth to fall back, hide, and counter attack at our choosing. No nation can successfully hold onto Australia with the deployments of hundreds of thousands of soldiers, perhaps a million.”
Answer . China has over 2 million men in its Army and millions more to call up. The Chinese also have a large well paid fifth column within Australia and subscribe to the creed to “Win Without Fighting”. Similar to Hitler’s strategy with the Appeasers he took the Rhineland, Austria and Czechoslovakia without fighting. Once they cut off our oil supplies and military goods our leaders will surrender and fly off to the South of France.

4. “The ADF would not engage in head on battles after a successful invasion, instead hit supply lines, logistics, hit and run tactics, use terrain and local knowledge to our advantage. Prior to the invasion force arriving which will need to traverse tight sea lanes and be visible to anyone who is looking.”
Answer. Amazing that people still see danger coming from the North of Australia, they imagine an enemy would be stupid enough to land in Northern Territory and march down to the southern capitals, when if all of their other ploys failed and they did have to fight they could either fly into the airports that they already own, or land anywhere between Sydney and Melbourne and drive to Canberra, or both. We have nothing to stop them. They have a Navy and Air force and we don’t.

5. “The Jindalee over the Horizon Radar System can track planes and ships in the South China Sea as far as Southern China. A large fleet headed to Australia would be tracked by this system or via satellite. Submarines and Aircraft would be used to either stop this fleet or reduce its effectiveness.”
Answer. More than likely China will take an off shore island like Lord Howe Island and one of the Chesterton Island and once supplied with J20 supersonic jet fighters and lots of missiles before turning off all our imports. From our six Collins Class Submarines we might get one to go to sea, as they are based in Western Australia it might take a fortnight to get to Torres Straits for its suicide run. China has 60 submarines and submarine drones even if we could send one or two destroyers or frigates they would be committing suicide again Chinese battle fleets with plenty of air cover.

6. “China would have limited or no air support. China has 1 Aircraft carrier with 1 locally built carrier soon to join the fleet. The limited numbers of aircraft they carry do not pose a significant threat to Australia’s air force which is also obtaining the F-35 Stealth Fighter. You only need to hit the air craft carrier to take out China’s air cover, then prevent China taking an airport/base as part of its invasion which would leave Chinese troops at the mercy of the Australian Air Force, it would be a slaughter. Australia would lose a number of F-18 Super Hornets to ship based defences, however combined with limited numbers F-35’s, P-8 Poseidon maritime strike planes, let alone the Australian Navy which would first use Collins Class Submarines.”
Answer. The Government stooge who writes the above clap trap has obviously not been informed of the two Chinese airport already here in Western Australia both controlled by Chinese State Corporations Citic and China Southern Airlines. The writer obviosly would not know that off shore Islands unlike aircraft carriers are un-sinkable, that China would not have to bring its carriers into the range of our air force, yet Chinese aircraft could dominate all of the East coast of Australia as the J20 has a range of 1100 miles. The J20 aircraft is considered a good match for the F35 maybe better, but no matter China has a lot more of them and has the factories that produce more when needed.

7. “Tiger attack helicopters would attack and landings and without air cover Chinese invading Ground forces would be decimated and easily repelled by the Australian Army. The US would also quickly resupply Australia with new aircraft, they have plenty of F-18 Super Hornets in the inventory to send us, plus the F-35’s will be rolling of the production line, they would be sent to the Australian air force to replace losses just as they did to Israel in its wars, we could also obtain resupply of smart missiles/bombs and other equipment we would require.”
Answer. Our 22 Tiger attack helicopter might have 12 working, China can draw on 1004, it also has 1500 fighter jets to give it as much air cover as it needs. The F-35s can role off the production line in the USA but Australia will have no means of flying or sailing them into the country. Re-supply of anything will be zero, as all sea way and air ways will be blocked by Chinese missiles or aircraft.

8. For China to successfully have any chance of invading Australia it would need to secure air bases and ports closer to Australia such as in Indonesia or PNG. This build-up of Chinese forces and bases would be seen and known well in advance and preparations would be made for a potential Chinese invasion. Without land based support from aircraft and a much shorter supply line an invasion would fail. Even with this the numbers of troops required to secure Australia’s population and hold the land against counter attack by Australian allies such as the US, Britain, NZ, Japan, Singapore to name a few would be immense and not possible.
Answer. We know about it already in advance anyway, we are surrounded by Chinese air bases and deep water ports. It has been seen, but our Appeasement Governments are too scared to alert Australia and place it on a ready for war footing. Defence problems happen quickly, China has land based support for its aircraft and short distances to its local ports and bases. China’s bases in Antarctica would assist with targeting Chinese missiles to knock out all government infrastructure. China has had much experience in securing civilian populations, it eliminates the none useful and makes slaves of only the ones worth feeding.
Good British, Canadian and American people would want there governments to assist Australia but they would be powerless to assist, China has its bases all in a row, it would control the Indian Ocean, the Pacific Ocean and the vast resources of the Southern Ocean, China’s southern flank will be secured they might be able to impose trade sanctions on China for a few years, they might stop the World Bank paying China a Billion US dollars every year in aid, but with all the resources from Antarctica, Australia and the South Pacific China will be an unstoppable world power. Japan, Taiwan, Malaysia. Indonesia, Africa and India will be the next ducks in the row.

China will not care about Global Warming, or Save the Whales, they want world domination and nothing will stand in their way. Ron Owen

Got a gun? Meet the MP who thinks you're better off dead

Minister for Police Mr David Elliott.

Got a gun? Meet the MP who thinks you're better off dead

In late 2017, the Deputy Premier of NSW tasked a committee of the New South Wales Parliament to consider changes to the NSW Firearms Act to support the rights of homeowners trying to protect themselves.

The committee has just handed down its verdict.  In this blog we reveal the verdict, and why the NSW Police Minister seems to think:

 people are better off being Dead than Alive with a gun

Minister Elliott’s response

We have now received Mr Elliott’s advice. You can read it by clicking here (check your ‘download’ folder if you can’t find it).

To say it is astonishing is an understatement.  We have summarised what Mr Elliott's said below in bold, with our comments in brackets:

 The issue about whether you can use a gun contrary to your ‘genuine reason’ arises in the National Firearms Agreement  (Wrong.  Genuine reason is regulated by the NFA, but 'use' is not.  The 'use' of firearms is regulated by section 7A of the NSW Firearms Act which is out of step with every other jurisdiction and the NFA, and is something Mr Elliott could fix)

 Mr Dunstan acted outside the NFA (No.  If anything Mr Dunstan arguably used his firearm outside section 7A for the apparently trivial purpose of staying alive, but he was fully compliant with the NFA);

 "There is no intention to amend the genuine reasons provision" (We’re not asking Mr Elliott do that. We’re asking his government to amend 7A to allow for 'reasonable lawful excuse' so that courts can consider each matter on their circumstances and merit);  

 “… the use of a firearm in self-defence is a serious and lethal step which would not automatically protect the person from a criminal charge, despite the assertion they were defending themselves or their property” (Mr Dunstan was not charged with any offences, so Mr Elliott’s comments on this are not relevant);

 “In either case the use of a firearm is not endorsed as a means to self defend, given the potential lethality of a firearm, the risk to the person, the risk to any other person in the vicinity (including the criminal) in a highly volatile and emotionally fraught moment. The risk of escalating the violence is extreme” (Anyone who says this should not be allowed near guns ...); 

 “We also trust in our police to come to our aid and our criminal justice system to prosecute offenders and hold them to account for their actions” (Except that the police are 45 minutes away from Mr Dunstan’s property, and according Mr Dunstan, sometimes don't turn up to intruder calls. If you are going to wait for the NSW Police to come to protect you from a druggie with a knife, you will be dead by the time the police arrive)

Mr Elliott’s response is remarkable. It suggests the better outcome would have been for Mr Dunstan to have been dead, rather than be proactive and stay alive. 

… which is ironic given Mr Elliott was a captain in the army ….

https://nationalshooting.org.au/blog/f/got-a-gun-meet-the-mp-who-thinks-youre-better-off-dead?utm_source=NSC&utm_campaign=bf7c3ad5b6-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2019_12_04_08_01&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_34b833c762-bf7c3ad5b6-27924541

Thoughts For The Week By Ron Owen.

Thoughts For The Week.

I began writing articles focussing on the civilians right to own and use firearms in 1981. Many millions of my words have been published in many formats from the local Gympie Times newspaper, Lock Stock and Barrel magazine and even the New York Times has published two of my letters. Our opponents, which we have no shortage of, accuse me of being a single- topic writer, a single- topic thinker, and a single- topic constituent, but it isn’t true.

This ‘Right’ ‘for ‘subjects’ may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions allowed by law’ (Bill of Rights 1689) which is similar to the USA Bill of Rights, but is our Bill of Rights which the Monarch swears to uphold at their Coronation and it is also established in Queensland Law in ‘Imperial Acts Application Act 1984' Schedule 1 (Imperial enactments continued in force). For this is the corner stone, the key principle for all of our other rights and our constitutional system of government. Without the right of the citizens to own firearms, total power is in the hands of government. Force is the ultimate source of all authority, and as night follows day, not long after the citizens are deprived of their force, tyrannical governments can easily remove all other rights. All those old enough can remember the freedoms we have already lost, which have followed the gradual disarmament policies of our media driven duopoly. We only have to look at the Hong Kong hero’s, to appreciate the disdain that tyrannical governments view the rights of disarmed people. Those heroic protesters with the umbrellas will be all listed and taken away in the night one at a time like the young students of Tiananmen Square, well the ones that survived the flame thrower, machine guns and tanks that cleared the Square on that infamous night. Once the people are defenceless gradualism takes them into slavery, the weight of the chains only increase in time.

The rights to own and use firearms protects the right to travel throughout your own country without having to show your papers, the right to petition your Monarch, or the government and to do that you have to have the right to freedom of speech and the freedom to communicate the issues that you wish to petition on. The right to own firearms protects the right to own property and to acquire and dispose of it to your benefit. The right to own firearms guarantees that we have a fair electoral system and ‘Habeas corpus’ a justice system where we cannot be locked away without trial. Firearms in the hands of the public guarantee our rights under the Magna Carta,  the rights to have a trial by jury of your peers, the right to defend your property, your family and your life.

Internal and External Security, The Main Reasons to Live in a Community
In the 1970’s how many of those rights listed above have been blemished or removed because we gave the lunatics the keys to the asylum and called it Parliament.  Our present set of lunatics proclaim the righteousness of democracy and chant “power to the people” in one voice while simultaneously demanding the loss of the common citizenry’s access to the means of force which is the highest tier of hypocracy.

Like Pavlov’s dogs the bell rings and as a pack they bark “who needs to die in your life before you will support disarmament” which is the consolidation of power in the hands of a small elite, namely those who bark for it. The only suitable reply is “how many defenceless law abiding Australians need to be robbed, raped and murdered in their own homes before you support their right to own property and defend their own lives”.

The Gun Control politicians hate this principle and will do belly swamis over broken glass rather than answer that point in public. They hate everyone who brings it to their attention, they hate it because it exposes them, when they believe that they can get away with it they will feign to support us, when they believe they are going to be quoted, and dismissed from the party they will vote at their parties call and suffer any indignities and electoral losses.

This point is an x-ray machine into the mind of any politician. It’s the ultimate test to which any politician, or political philosophy, can be put.   If a politician isn’t perfectly comfortable with the idea of his average constituent, any man or woman, walking into a Gun Shop and paying cash for any rifle, shotgun or handgun and leaving with it, he isn’t your friend no matter what he tells you.

If your politician isn’t genuinely enthusiastic about his average constituent walking out of the shop without asking anybody’s permission, he is one of the problems, no matter what else he claims. His attitude toward your ownership and use of firearms conveys his real attitude about you. If he doesn’t trust you, then why should you trust him? If he doesn’t want you to have the means of defending your life, do you want him in a position to control it?

In 98% of the world as soon as the public are disarmed, the criminal element, knowing that the police can never supervise the whole community, begin to target the defenceless.

If your politician makes excuses about obeying a law he’s sworn to uphold and defend the Commonwealth Constitution remind him that his oath covers an older and higher law of the our land, the Bill of Rights of 1689, if he cannot support this with deeds you can never trust him to walk down to the corner shop and bring back your change.

If he ignores you, sneers at you, complains about you, or defames you, if he calls you names only he thinks are evil like “Populist” “Constitutionalist”, hasn’t he betrayed his oath, isn’t he unfit to hold office, and doesn’t he really belong in jail?

These are all important principles. These are the principles that inspired me to research and investigate firearm legislation as the clearest and most unmistakable demonstration of what any given politician, or political philosophy is really made of.

They all will lecture you about the dangerous weirdos out there who shouldn’t have a gun — but what does that have to do with you? Your taxes pay for the Police, Trial, Jury and Jail. Why should you be made to suffer for the misdeeds of others? Didn’t you lay aside the tyrannical notion of group punishment when you studied communism and socialism. If there are dangerous weirdos out there, does it make sense to deprive you of the means of protecting yourself from them? This is about you, and your family, that is the point of being in a community, safety from harm.

It makes voting simpler, doesn’t it? You don’t have to study every issue – health care, international trade, all you have to do is use this x-ray machine, ask them how hard will they work to return your firearm ownership rights back to you? This has the clarity and truth of a steel bell ringing to expose their empty words and find out how politicians really feel about you. That, of course, is why they hate being asked and that is why I am accused of being a single topic writer, thinker, and voter, but it isn’t true, is it?

Defenceless
Since the early 1990s I have also been decried for ‘worrying and crying wolf’ for warning about the deplorable state of our external Defence and Defence Industries. We naturally first think of Internal Defence and firearm ownership but even though the media and politicians ‘poo hoo’ the concept, firearm ownership in the hands of civilians is crucial to our defence, besides training our young people to hunt and shoot, it creates a civil industry that can support a defence industry when needed and ultimately makes genocide impossible for a conquering power. Defence against external threat is also more relevant now than at any time since 1942 and that time we had 20 times the defence industry that we have in 2019.

Japan’s Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto is quoted

“To invade the United States would prove most difficult because behind every blade of grass is an American with a rifle.”

The referenced “letter” to Ryoichi Saskakawa is claimed to be in the extensive personal files of Gordon W. Prange, the personal historian for Gen. Douglas MacArthur.

In Christian News published on 4 February 2002 the following:-
“In 1960, Robert Menard was a commander aboard the USS Constellation when he was part of a meeting between United States Navy personnel and their counterparts in the Japanese Defence Forces. Fifteen years had passed since VJ Day, most of those at the meeting were WWII veterans, and men who had fought each other to the death at sea were now comrades in battle who could confide in each other. Someone at the table asked a Japanese admiral why, with the Pacific Fleet devastated at Pearl Harbor and the mainland U.S. forces in what Japan had to know was a pathetic state of unreadiness, Japan had not simply invaded the West Coast. Commander Menard would never forget the crafty look on the Japanese commander’s face as he frankly answered the question. ‘You are right,‘ he told the Americans. ‘We did indeed know much about your preparedness. We knew that probably every second home in your country contained firearms. We knew that your country actually had state championships for private citizens shooting military rifles. We were not fools to set foot in such quicksand.”

It is simple reality, if this was not the case any invading force would not firstly disarm the local civilian population, yet even the Romans took care of that point.

Why is it more relevant now to Australia?
Our present day lunatics within the hot air of Canberra’s house of ill repute refuse to acknowledge the threats from our northern neighbours. For many years Australia’s political harum-scarum have actively sought to engage China in the belief that Chinese economic integration with the world would eventually lead to the liberalisation of China’s political system. But as Xi Jinping’s first five years in office have made clear, that optimism was misplaced. A more affluent China has become more authoritarian, more nationalistic, and increasingly intent on changing the international environment to one it perceives better reflects its own interests. The USA has sought to soft peddle, encouraging China to pacify North Korea, meanwhile Beijing’s has made a chess move with a massive military expansion in the Indo-Pacific region.

Demand Defence
If China gets away with moving ballistic long range missile’s a 1000 miles nearer to resource rich defenceless Australia, we won’t have to wait long for its next move. Oil in Brunei, Sarawak, Borneo, or another hop further south into another inhabited island.

Islands are cheaper then aircraft carriers and have the additional benefit of being harder to sink
Since the early 1990s when writing in Lock, Stock and Barrel (see, http://www.owenguns.com/lock-stock-and-barrel-magazine/
I have been a lone voice, so regular that friends told me ‘the record has stuck’, but it is a subject I have been very passionate about and at last even one Liberal politician Andrew Hastie MP has awoken from Liberal Rip van winkle sleep and alerted us to the northern threats. Of course he has suffered a small dose of the ‘slings and arrow of outrage’ for his trouble but he will get used to that.

The USA Has To Accept It Cannot Be A Force In Asia
It would be great if it was, but the one thing that is certain, is that everything is in a state of change. Asia has changed and the USA has changed.

Then we have Emeritus Professor of Strategic Studies at the Australian National University, Hugh White (a former senior official in the Department of Defence) who has written a book “How to Defend Australia”, which sets out the tough choices facing Australia. He astutely warns, that America may not chose to defend Australia against China or Indonesia.

It urges Australians to consider the risks emerging in the region and how to prepare for a very different future. “There is still a deep reluctance among political leaders of both sides of politics to really acknowledge the seriousness of the situation,” Prof White said

He hopes to spark a rethink of Australia’s defence policy, recognising that things have changed and that America’s dominance in East Asia will likely diminish in the future and leave Australia to defend itself. “A lot argue that we would be mad to abandon the US alliance and I agree but what if they abandon us?” his book says.
‘How To Defend Australia’. states. AMERICA WILL LIKELY DESERT US!
“Neither side of politics is taking China’s challenge seriously and even if they do, they are saying we should cling more tightly to the US.”My argument is I don’t think US support is a durable solution,” he said. “I think it’s likely the US will eventually withdraw from Asia, which is why I’m sceptical of (US Secretary of State) Mike Pompeo saying the US will push back”. Despite the strong words, Prof White said “the US was not doing anything to push back”. “We need to think about how Australia can stand up for itself in an Asia that is not dominated by America.”
China has put a massive amount of money into its air and naval forces and now has nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles. Soon nuclear powered aircraft carriers. China has many more long range nuclear weapons that threaten American cities than North Korea.
Professor White says,“In a new Cold War, Americans would have to ask whether saving Taiwan from China — and preserving US leadership in Asia — would be worth losing Los Angeles and Seattle,”

To save Australia from China would the US President sacrifice Los Angeles and Seattle, or Hawaii or San Francisco?” America’s own security does not depend on preventing China from dominating East Asia. Why then would America accept the costs and risks of trying to do that?” Never think that Australia is not a nuclear target, or that placing ballistic missiles in Australia will increase our importance as a target as one of the USA’s major all-important listening communication centre’s is at Pine Gap. We have been a target for 50 years.

THE THREATS ARE REAL?
If there’s one easy way to understand Australia’s vulnerability, you only have to look at its neighbours the threat is not just about China.  Australia has gotten used to being one of the biggest economies in the region. In the 1980s Australia had the second-biggest economy in Asia, after Japan. Our Gross Domestic Product (GDP) was bigger than China’s. The story is different today with GDP now being only 5 per cent of China’s and less than 50% of Indonesia’s. (Yet we still give them Australian Aid??) By 2050, it has been estimated Australia’s economy will rank well behind those of all major Southeast Asian nations. India is expected to become the world’s second-biggest economy, while Indonesia will probably become the fourth-biggest economy and will have the weight to become one of Asia’s great powers. Indonesia has always been seen as a potential strategic risk for Australia because of its size and proximity, and this will only increase as it becomes more powerful. “Australia has never had to deal with a neighbour more powerful than itself, and it will take some getting used to,” says Prof White.

Prof White correctly believes Australia’s first two objectives are to deny our immediate maritime and air approaches to potential enemies. Indonesia is the only country in Australia’s immediate neighbourhood capable of being a valuable ally but also a serious adversary.

South Pacific Island Hop Skip and Jump
Even if Indonesia was an ally, China more than likely hop around it and park one of its aircraft carriers next to Long Island 19°53’S 158°19’E, 10 nm NW of Loop Islet, it is the largest of the Chesterfield Islands, in the Coral Sea and is 1400m to 1800 m, ideal for a military air strip.

Some might have read about the Battle of the Coral Sea in World War Two, a Japanese Aircraft Carrier fleet on its way to invade Port Moresby and Australia lost one of its carriers and most of its aircraft to a US and Australian fleet so Japan withdrew. The area is strategically very important as it dominates the Torres Straights and the eastern sea board of Australia.

As the Chesterfield Islands belong to France and France does not have the will or the resources to declare war on China and fight it in the South Pacific, nor for that matter is Australia. So with the 792 fighter aircraft available to the China Navy at present, and building more at an ever increasing rate and having the Shenyang J-31 range of 1200 klm China would dominate the Coral Sea.

The next stop for a Chinese Aircraft carrier, (by next year China will have three of them, there is five in the current program, the last one keeping up with the Americans will be nuclear powered) will be Lord Howe island 31° 33' 15? S, 159° 5' 6? E , in the Tasman Sea 320 miles from mainland Australia. There is an air strip in situ, so China would control the whole eastern seaboard of Australia. Lord Howe island is technically a part of NSW, outside Australia’s territorial waters.

If we could get 3 of our 6 Australian made Collins Submarines to work, they would take a few weeks and a re fuel before they arrived on the scene.  The 30 or so other ships of the Australian Navy, (if they can find the crews) some not much larger then “Daddy’s Yacht” would not be a deterrent and it is doubtful that the Australian Navy would try a suicidal attack, with the Chinese Navy having 2000 ships including 70 nuclear submarines.
About that time, Australian politicians will be trying to organise refineries for Oil and Shale Oil and put its mind to converting coal into petroleum, but it will be too late, from the very first day oil tankers coming to mainland Australia would be stopped, and re routed so in 28 day time this would cause Australia to put up the white flag and surrender and China would win Australia without firing a shot in anger. Of course all air flights into Australia would be suspended after the Chinese shot the first one down. No one could afford the insurance premiums.

Australia has to use its Natural Resources or Lose Them
China has the capability to take Australia, to utilise its natural resources, Australia will not utilise them, as its government is anti nuclear and anti coal, anti mining and anti industry so there would be a moral argument by the Chinese that Australian do not deserve to have the resources at their disposal.

Total control of China Smh article

World Sleepwalking to WAR
Former Australian Defence Force chief Admiral Chris Barrie warns the world is sleepwalking towards war. Admiral Barrie’s concerns were echoed by strategic analyst Greg Copley, the president of the Washington based International Strategic Studies Association. Mr Copley said not enough attention- had been paid to developing a strategic industrial base in this country and Australians should feel “outraged to the point of revolution” that it cost three times more to build a submarine in Adelaide than in Japan or Europe. Australia has long relied on America to protect it, including through its policy of extended nuclear deterrence (NED), which says the US will retaliate against another country that attacked one of its allies.
This policy was a good deterrent when America had superior firepower but in recent years China has put a massive amount of money into its air and naval forces and now has nuclear-armed intercontinental ballistic missiles and submarine-launched ballistic missiles. This means the US no longer has a military advantage, and any war would also be fought in the Western Pacific, close to China’s shores and giving it a strategic advantage.

What Does Australia Need To Defend ITSELF?
First it needs a free country that is worth fighting and sacrificing for, that is culturally cohesive. It needs to train everyone to appreciate that the nation comes first, not what’s in it for me, money or promotion. We need to rapidly begin manufacturing firearms and weapons of war here, we need to produce the infrastructure in materials and skills to manufacture every part here in Australia as parts will never be available in an emergency either the supply lines will be breached, or the country we intend to procure them will be busy with its war.  An example of this is with the 84mm Carl Gustaff recoil less rifle, Sweden did not agree with Australia’s involvement in the Vietnam War so would not supply parts or ammunition. When you want it most, you need to have it on hand.

It will be many years before Australia can compete with large ships, or state of the art fighter planes or nuclear submarines. We had that manufacturing ability before with Mirage Jets and Jindivik missiles, but our lunatic politicians sold us out, our national interest in recreation has given us special abilities which can be turned into a national deterrent.

Iran is leading the way, on May 16, 2019, U.S. officials cited reports that Iran had installed missiles on civilian motorboats IRAN IRGCN asymmetric military fast attach power-missile boats and both civil and military shipping within inshore waters and the great Barrier Reef is exceptionally vulnerable to mines, cruise missiles and fast boat attacks because its shallow straits force large ships to squeeze through predictable lines of transit. Australia has many thousands of boating enthusiasts who are experienced in navigation and local conditions they have to be mobilised into a ready reserve. The Iranians bought a British Bladerunner 51 speed boat from South Africa. Photos reveal these have been armed with a multiple-rocket-launcher system and a heavy anti-aircraft machinegun on the prow. The Seraj can reportedly attain speeds of 55 to 72 knots. The sleek, domestically-designed Zolfaghar  has a maximum speed of 70 knots and mounts an integrated radar and two launch canisters for Nasr-1 cruise missiles on its stern. Based on the Chinese C704 missile, the Nasr-1 has a range of 22 miles, and can use infrared, radar or television guidance. The small and affordable boats have low radar signatures, which combined with speed, would significantly reduce their target’s reaction time. Australia could produce these and importantly, their sheer numbers could overwhelm the expensive defensive systems on board Chinese warships.

We cannot afford to wait till 2040 for 12 over priced conventional submarines we need hundreds of them now. Iran has 32 midget submarines and media reported that the Nasr-1 missile was launched by a Ghadir-class mini-submarine Iranian media said the missile was an upgraded version of the Nasr-1 missile the country had showcased in 2008. It was then described as an anti-vessel missile with a range of 35 kilometers (or 22 miles).

Real Australian Made Submarines
An Australian inventor Ron Allum completely rethought the design of submersible vehicles, from how they launch and travel through water to what they’re made of. He designed a new material called “Isofloat” capable of withstanding the 16,500psi pressure at the depths of the Mariana Trench. And in addition to rigging lights and high-definition cameras to the vehicle for James Cameron, Ron equipped the sub with scientific research equipment to take valuable samples from the sea. Then on 26th March 2012, James Cameron reached the bottom of the Challenger Deep, the deepest part of the Mariana Trench. The maximum depth recorded during this record-setting dive was 10,908 metres (35,787 ft). So here in Australia we do have the technology to make small highly technical submarines better than Iran. We just have to get into manufacturing them until we have 500 or so.

Japan was making Midget submarines to defend the homeland right to the end of WW2 1945 when this photo was taken.

To defend Australia firstly we need to deny our enemies the use of our territorial waters by sinking lots of their ships. We desperately need anti ballistic missiles for air defence, but even if China or North Korea wipes out our population centres they cannot control us unless they put men on the ground and to do that they need ships to off load men and materials. Secondly, we need drones thousands of them flown by our very competitive X box flying simulators, who spend their recreational hours glued to the screens. They could be trained to fly drones and even if they are unarmed, if we have enough of them they can fly into jet engine air intakes, taking a jet fighter out of the fight.

Large ships like HMAS Canberra are useless for defence, just another thing that needs defending.

If all the above fails we need a land based deterrent, the same one that deterred the Japanese from ever contemplating invading the USA in 1941. We need a return to the 1903 Defence Act, the section that made every branch of the National Rifle Association a contingent of the militia, with the Club Captain the CO with the power to call out and direct. Every man or women on joining had to take the Oath of Allegiance and was a member of the Defence Force until 1997 when John Howard introduced his un informed Gun laws. For many years the Defence Department had reduced the resources and budget to these clubs so there was hardly a whimper when it was changed, but the Commonwealth Rifle Ranges had supplied thousands of shooters to the services in Two World Wars and Korea and Vietnam. Their range facilities were used as training and base areas for troops and they could have done much more if called to do so. Already we have 2 million licenced shooters and 6 million registered firearms, already that is the largest threat to any invader, we have to reinforce what we are good at. If a practical rifle competition is created with some small resources such as uniform ammunition, range facilities, and a little prize incentive, millions of law abiding shooter would become involved. If the Defence department then supplied a machine gun, anti tank rocket launcher, and a mortar to each club and began interclub competitions, like the Queens Prize then the competitive energy of these people would be directed towards defence and supplying them would create a defence industry. Many thousands of these young people who purchase their own firearms, their own two way radio’s their own four wheel drives, their own quads who go out every weekend to reduce our nations feral pig population know the ground and are already experienced in many of the skills of ground warfare can be motivated to form an essential part of our nations defence. They just need encouragement instead of the government derision they have experienced since 1996.

There is no Spring without Winter, without Mistakes there is no Learning. There is no Life without Death, without Doubts there is no Faith. There is no Peace without War, without Fear there is no Courage. For without Mistakes, Doubts and Fears there are no pathways to Wisdom.
Ron Owen.

Any Inquiries on any products phone 07 54824099 or 07 54825070 or email owenguns@spiderweb.com.au

Thoughts for the week By Ron Owen of Owen Guns. 15 May 2019

Thoughts For The Week.

“What you do in your lifetime will echo down through eternity”,
Marcus Aurelius.

Is it About Suppression?
On the 18th of May we have choices to make in our Federal Election. There are two choices, two examples of people that Australians can aim to imitate. One is to be free citizens, armed and sovereign. The other is to be a slave, disarmed and obedient to our socialist elite, master-class. Please chose wisely.

In some ways we have more choices than at any previous federal elections since Federation, but be careful, what you see is not always what you get. Sadly there is a concerted effort by Media and Politicians to suppress the issues and keep a tight lid on all evidence, information and opinions that go towards weakening the major parties control of our freedoms.

British Bill of Rights 1889. still in All Australian State law books.

The suppression is so successful that even people in the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party don’t believe we have any Rights.
One of the Rights we have left is the one that makes the major parties most vulnerable, that is the Right to vote. The only way we can utilise that Right is by having the Right to Free Speech, the free inter-exchange of information. This is the battleground of the 21st Century.

These Rights and our Rights for Subject to have Arms for our Defence are all acknowledged as pre existing in our Bill of Rights of 1689 which is installed in the Statute law of every State of Australia within the Imperial Acts Application Acts. Heavily suppressed and only dragged out when politicians are taken to task for defamation, as to their own legal protection.

https://www.foaa.com.au/our-rights-where-do-they-come-from/

https://www.foaa.com.au/our-bill-of-rights/

Subjects’ arms—That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.

Freedom of election—That election of members of Parliament ought to be free.

Freedom of speech—That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament.

Right to petition—That it is the right of the subjects to petition the King and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegall.

Note.( The Bill of Rights acknowledges that Catholic’s had the Right to be Armed as well in a previous section).

It is impossible for the Right of Freedom of Speech not to be a general Right as it is necessary to Petition and necessary for the Freedom of Election. Of course the power that guarantees all of these Rights is the Crown, our current head of State – Queen Elizabeth II. That is why our socialist intelligencers are so eager to dispose of our Constitution and impose one of their own manufacture.

That’s him the one on the left, green on the outside and red inside.

The Greens leader Richard Di Natale has promised his supporters he wants to close down Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones and I’m sure that any distributer of information that he did not believe in, would be included in his efforts. Di Natale seems to believe that anyone who does not agree with him is evil, supposedly we all divide Australians with our “hate speech”.

The enemy are in ‘damage control’, they appreciate the losses they have sustained due to Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, the major news channels are screaming at the politicians to control the internet, for as well as losing income they are losing control of people minds. ‘Fake News’ by mainstream media is exposed in seconds by people on the spot with a mobile phone. For example we could see for ourselves that Tommy Robinson activist (seen on more than one mobile phone),was just standing in the street when he was arrested, so when we read the nonsense written in newspapers and hear it on the six o clock news, we all know that its rubbish. This example has been repeated a million times and it exposes what the Major media will do to ignore the truth and manufacture it’s own version to suit their agenda.

The major Politicians’ have woken up, probably provoked by their banker paymasters and have legislated to control the internet, just recently 30 prominent activists including Tommy Robinson, Louis Farrakhan, Alex Jones Lauren Southern, Jeremy Boreing, Infowars, Paul Nehlen, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson and Laura Loomer and even Ron Owen have been banned from Facebook. Even President Trump has complained about the silencing Free Speech and criticised Facebook as they have particularly silenced the Conservative spokes people who appear to have done no wrong. I was banned from Facebook for sharing a photograph of my daughters 8 week old puppy.

I asked for reviews but of course the review is blocked. https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-attacks-social-media-companies-after-facebook-bans-20190505-p51k5t.html

Foreign Nations and Big Money Want to Control Our Communications.

To offset our attempts of free speech on the internet the George Soros types, the Big End of the New World Order have responded by pouring millions of dollars into “Get Back” to offset the ongoing damage of small internet media.

Al Jazeera has recently attacked the One Nation main senate hopeful and its mindless adviser James Ashby, with some justification I might add, as they could have checked the credentials of the false Firearm Lobbyist with just one phone call, and to behaved so poorly in the USA is an embarrassment for all Australians. However, if it is wrong for the NRA to buy into Australian Politics, it’s wrong for China to buy Australian Senator’s like Sam Dastyari and Captain Pierre Yang MP ( Western Australia upper house), and it’s wrong for George Soros to fund Gun Control Australia and “Get Up” and Friend of the ABC, then it is also very wrong for a foreign news agency Al Jazeera to plan a scam to lure two One Nation party members on the false pretext of obtaining $10 million in campaign funds. The scam worked Dickson and Ashby should not have had a bar of that proposal especially as One Nation Federal Firearm Policy is no better to the Labor and LNP policy, as it just says it does not want further legislation put on to law abiding shooters, and has refused to change it when they have been implored by Australian shooting associations. (Maybe its because they have not been offered the 10 million).

Al Jazeera is owned by Qatar, they do not have Australia’s best interests at heart they have the Arab/Islamic Qatar interests that control them. Its expensive to buy into a position of media power in any country the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa, provided a loan of QAR 500 million (US$137 million) to sustain Al Jazeera through its first five years. Shares are now held by private investors as well as the Qatar government, but the world power it wields is worth every penny, as they have TV news coverage, USA, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Russia and Australia, only China will keep them out. US137 million oil dollars is small change to influence political decisions in your favour.

Australia’s Pinnnicheo

Please do not think that the ABC is NOT Biased.

Just at the Federal Level. (If you add the State Personalities it is worse.)

A friend sent me this list…

Why Does Labor Protect the ABC.

· Why does the ABC Left media protect the left?

· Because the political commentators of the Left media are either intermingled or married to the left politicians.

· It’s a family thing and they protect their own:

· Greg Combet (Labor) partnered to Juanita Phillips (ABC).

· Gai Brodtmann (Labor) married to Chris Uhlmann (ABC)

· David Feeney (Labor) married to Liberty Sanger (guest commentator on ABC)

· Barry Cassidy (ABC) former speech writer for Bob Hawke (Labor) from 1986-1991

· Heather Ewart (ABC) married to Barry Cassidy (ABC) speech writer for Bob Hawke (Labor) from 1986-1991

· Maxine McKew (ABC) married to Bob Hogg (former ALP national secretary)

· Maxine McKew (ABC) became Labor politician replacing John Howard for one term only.

· Virginia Trioli (ABC) married to Russell Skelton (The Age)

· Mark Kenny (Fairfax) married to Virginia Haussegger (ABC)

· Christine Wallace (ABC & Fairfax) married to Michael Costello (former Chief of Staff to Labor’s Kim Beazley)

· Annabel Crabb (former Fairfax journalist now with the ABC)

· Tony Jones (ABC) married to Sarah Ferguson (ABC) Coincidentally Jones took over the Lateline role from Maxine McKew (from ABC presenter to Labor politician)

· David Penberthy (journalist) married to Kate Ellis (Labor)

· Paul Kelly (former Fairfax journalist) formerly married to Ros Kelly (Labor)

· Kerry O’Brien (ABC) former press secretary to Gough Whitlam.

· Mark Colvin (ABC) married to Michelle McKenzie (Leichhardt deputy-mayor and Greens Councillor)

· Denis Atkins (ABC Insiders regular) married to Melanie Christensen (ABC Canberra)

· Paul Barry (ABC) married to Lisa McGregor (ABC)

· The lamentable Mike Carlton (formerly Fairfax formally ABC) partners Morag Ramsay (ABC)

· Andrew Fraser (Fairfax) and Catriona Jackson (formerly Fairfax and Labor press secretary)

· And so the list goes on. Labor, Fairfax and the ABC are joined at the hip.

Much like the relationship between Labor and the unions, but they’re on YOUR Aussie payroll. Now you know why Bill Shorten wants to increase your Taxes. To fund his propaganda and jaundiced news.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31677-trump-climate-panel-could-expose-huge-fraud-hence-the-hysteria?fbclid=IwAR3pZ7pURanUecABfT47OpzGuUUDxxbLB54uayLNTjB2v-wqrkw8_nt6maA#

While the Major Political Parties Are Boring Us to Death With Climate Change Australia faces the greatest challenges since World War Two.
High-tech Chinese ships are mapping waters close to Papua New Guinea and at the same time the United States and Australia (after begging China to remove its bases from the International waters of the Spratly Islands) begin to upgrade a naval base on Manus Island which is just north of New Guinea. Besides the territorial waters of the Spratly Islands dominating the South China Sea which a third of the worlds shipping passes through annually ( 3 Trillion dollars worth), the Islands float on an underground sea of oil and gas. So China is not going to give them up, they are also a great stepping stone to the oil fields of Brunei, Sarawak, Borneo, this was the great plum that Japan needed and in 1938 it sent its Pearl Diving fleet to map out these intricate coastlines throughout Australia’s northern approaches.

Cardinal Points.

•Chinese ships deployed to waters near Manus Island as Australia and US announce naval base upgrades

•The vessels are among a large fleet increasing its surveys around the Philippines, Palau, Guam and Japan

•Experts believe the information could be crucial in any future maritime conflict

The Big Issues For This Election is External Threats and Our Defence Forces Paints its Finger nails ‘Pink’.

The deep-water Chinese scientific surveys are part of Beijing’s unprecedented oceanographic research of the Western Pacific, in an area experts believe could be crucial in any future maritime conflict. Military analysis of GPS satellite data reveals two Chinese research vessels entered Papua New Guinea Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) north of Manus Island, just weeks after US Vice President Mike Pence announced a joint redevelopment of the ageing Lombrum naval base. The ships involved, the Ke Xue and Hai Ce 3301, are part of a two-dozen strong Chinese “Distant-Ocean Research fleet” that has conducted expansive maritime surveys around the Philippines, Palau, Guam and Japan over the past two years.

Navel experts say the activities in Papua New Guinea’s EEZ indicates “bathymetric data collection” taking place. High-tech Chinese ships are mapping waters close to Papua New Guinea just as the United States and Australia begin upgrading a naval base on Manus Island.

Australian Defence Force March at Sydney’s Gay Mardi Gras.

Australia’s Defence Department are planning for short-term troop deployments to the former Australian territory. About 30 Australian army officers are already embedded with the PNG Defence Force (PNGDF), but that number is down significantly on past decades.

In between Gay Mardi Gras Marches and sex changes Australian soldiers could soon begin regular military rotations to Papua New Guinea as anxiety over China’s growing influence in the Pacific region continues to rise. In the 20th Century we used to call the Air Force the Brylcreem boys, they could afford it, we considered them posh and slightly effeminate, but they got the girls and succeeded in getting their work done. Now, in Australia the RAAF men are ordered to paint their fingernails pink in support of a queer type of feminism.

War with Indonesia, North Korea, or even the island of Singapore would be terminal, but war with China, well our best bargaining tool would be that they might not want to ruin the properties that they already own here such as the Port of Melbourne and the Port of Darwin, and two airports in Western Australia.  They have spent billions in mining sites, they are the largest foreign owner of Australia’s real estate, they own city water supplies, electrical power distribution and power stations.  They are really miffed that Huawei was prevented from taking over our 5 G telecommunication system. The Garnaut-ASIO report, finished in mid-2017 and never released, uncovered damning new evidence of interference and influence involving Chinese government officials and separately, Communist Party-aligned businessmen seeking political favours and access.

“We’ve had multiple briefings at the top secret level from ASIO and other agencies that foreign interference is being conducted in Australia at an unprecedented level,” Mr Hastie said.

Liberal MP Andrew Hastie, who chaired the parliamentary committee on intelligence and security where they pushed through new counter-interference reforms in 2018, has made the most-strident comments about Beijing to emerge from the Morrison government.

“There are several authoritarian states who are involved in foreign influence across the globe. But in Australia the Chinese Communist Party is probably the most active … China is seeking to influence our elites, particularly our political and business elites, such as Senator Sam Dastyari in order to achieve their strategic objectives.

Even the Australian Army is a target for the Chinese fifth column, Captain Pierre Yang MP ( Western Australia upper house) had to either resign from the parliament of Western Australia, or resign from his association with the Chinese Communist Party fronts. He stated, “I resigned as a member of both the Northeast China Federation and the Association of Great China,” he said in a statement after a story about the memberships was published by News Corp.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6466603/Labor-MP-Pierre-Yang-breaks-tears-hits-Chinese-spy-ship-reports.html

Mr Yang spent 49 days on a Chinese navel vessel, citing security experts as saying the vessel may have been conducting spying activities. This Chinese ship was engaged, like the ones mentioned above to chart the northern islands coastline but was taken from these duties to look for the missing Malaysian airliner in the Indian Ocean.

Labor Premier Mark McGowan stated, “it speaks volumes of him,””His proud service for this country, serving as a Captain of the Australian Army Reserve” “I would be certain that the ASIO and the relevant defence agencies have vetted an officer in the army reserve.” Maybe they were the ones that raised the issue of his membership to Associations run by the Chinese Communist Party, we can only hope.

The Nancy looking, Chief of Army David Morrison has not a care for our nations security and makes statements like.

“The Defence Force did not reflect contemporary Australian society, and with women representing just 12 per cent of the army workforce it was making “lousy” use of the talent on offer, Lieutenant General Morrison told ABC TV.

He said undue emphasis on Anzac stories that were “overwhelmingly white, overwhelmingly male, overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon” risked alienating women and indigenous and ethnic Australians, who were currently under-represented in the army.”

If General Morrison’s logic is right – that is the current members of the Army aren’t good enough because the talent lies with ethnic indigenous women etc, al – then let him point to his Army’s stuff-ups. Let him tell us which operational situations we screwed up because we were too white and Anglo Saxon. Where would we have done better if we were more feminine, more black or more ethnic – Gallipoli? The Western Front? Kokoda? Long Tan?

The Army’s pointy bit is the Royal Australian Corps of Infantry – mostly in the Royal Australian Regiment and the Special Air Service Regiment. The role of the infantry is to seek out and close with the enemy, to kill or capture him, to seize and hold ground, to repel attack, by day or night, regardless of season, weather or terrain. I do not know many ladies interested in plunging bayonets into withering screaming flesh, nor do I want to meet them, but if they are out there, I can hardly see that there would be enough of them to improve the defence force, which is really short of trained men, arms and materials. They do not need any more lipstick and finger nail paint we need the leader of our Army to be a soldier, not a social engineer.

It’s a Mental Disorder!
It take millions of dollars to take a good man from ‘civvy’ street and train him to lead men in combat, but they are resigning from the Force as they are forced to salute men with the 5 o’clock shadow, dressed in skirted women’s uniform wearing lipstick and a wig.

Rear Admiral Hammond said “the navy needed to look at a range of measures — from supporting women’s sporting events to -reviewing procedures for unconscious gender bias.

“We must do this as one navy, regardless of age, rank, race, religion, sexual orientation, ability or gender,” he said. “We cannot afford to leave anyone behind.” Well you would not want them behind you would you?
Dr. Paul McHugh, former head of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins, calls transgender feelings a disorder of assumption similar to that experienced by emaciated anorexics who consider themselves obese and literally starve themselves to death.
“‘Sex change’ is biologically impossible,” said McHugh. “People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.”

Threats to Our Human Rights, Threats to our External Security and one of the Greatest Threats is our Internal Security.
In Australia we already have NO GO areas for Non Muslims. Area’s where White anglo saxons, especially people with fair, or red hair are targets for harassment or violence. Police even stop them from walking down those streets and threaten to arrest the white people for disturbing the peace. Please do not think that the rest of Australia is not a Target for an Islamic take over. We should have a great big Goodbye Australia party for the Islamic’ just tell them that those willing to take the Oath of Allegiance to Queen Elisabeth II as per the words in the Commonwealth Constitution, those who put their allegiance to other objectives well they can sail somewhere else. I will bring the bacon!

Invasion by Gradualism.

This is how they have moved in on Britain.
This is the way the British people have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

Mayor of London … Muslim

Mayor of Birmingham … Muslim

Mayor of Leeds … Muslim

Mayor of Blackburn … Muslim

Mayor of Sheffield … Muslim

Mayor of Oxford … Muslim

Mayor of Luton …. Muslim

Mayor of Oldham … Muslim

Mayor of Rochdale … Muslim

All of the following achieved by just 4 Million Muslims out of the 66 Million population:

Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques

Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts

Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils

Muslims Only No-Go Areas across the UK

Muslim Women … 78% don’t work and are on free Benefits / Housing

Muslim Men … 63% Don’t work and are on free Benefits / Housing

Muslim Families … 6-8 children planning to go on free Benefits / Housing.

All UK Schools are serving free Halal food .

Yet here in Australia we can’t decide to vote for someone with the right immigration policy.

Fraser Anning and his good wife Fiona visiting the Owen Guns Trust museum. He is the man to change the direction of this country for the better.

In 1933 the 70 percent of the German people woke up to find that less than 30 percent who had voted placed the National Socialists Workers Party and Hitler as the new Chancellor, like Britain and even here with compulsory voting, lots of people did not bother to vote. Millions more did not even bother to find out the policies of the people they voted for. Some of the Candidates did not even understand or know the policies that they were standing for. That is still the case in Australia is 2019.

In Germany in 1933 the non caring people, those not in the Nazi Party gradually found that their world of comfort, peace and freedom had come to an end and instead they understood that they belonged to the State, and they had lost control of their own and their families destiny. A few years later the fanatical minority plunged the Germany into a devastating and costly world war, and by the end of the war the survivors had woken up to a another reality – they had lost everything for nothing.

They had lost everything for nothing.
I see the same situation playing out today with respect to the attitude of the majority, maybe 51 % towards the expansionist Islamist movement. We are told again and again by politicians and ‘bimbos and bimbettes’ on the TV that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. This unqualified assertion may be true, but the fact is that it is entirely irrelevant! It is meaningless hot air, meant to send us back to sleep again, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that, same as Germany in 1933, the fanatics rule Islam and have ruled it since 623 AD. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who are waging any one of the 50 shooting wars currently going on worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, or tribal groups in Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, and carry out the so called honour killing. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers. The hard and quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ has been cowed and made extraneous and irrelevant.” That is the same as Australia, Apathy is used by experts. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million of their own people. The peaceful majority were silent, irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million of its own citizens. The average Japanese family, prior to and during World War II, was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians, most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. Cambodia, Rwanda, all collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans, and Cambodians were ‘peace loving people?

True history is incredibly simple and blunt, thousands of years of genocide. Yet for all our modern education with infinite resources to libraries of information and powers of reason, we miss the most basic messages, peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy, if they don’t speak up, (and already they are very scared) they will wake up, one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun. Peace loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

So to here in Australia, if the peace loving, apathetic, hangers on do not awake to the reality of their circumstances they will be rubbed out extinguished, or forced to be a slave of Islam.

Islamic prayers have now been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too while the Lord’s Prayer was removed due to being so offensive! But to whom? Not to the vast majority of Canadians but to the few Islamic fanatics!

The Islamic way is only peaceful until the fanatics move in and take control. In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items now have the halal emblem on them. (i.e a sign or instruction that says this product can be eaten, consumed or used by Islamics).   Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food products in your local supermarket. Foods on aircraft have the halal emblem, and it is not just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding throughout the world but every time we unclean unbelievers buy those items a part of the costs goes to the Islamic foundations for supporting terrorism for training more terrorists. It is funding fanatics.

In Britain, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of no-go zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuses to acknowledge British law. As for we who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts, the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

When an Islamic atrocity actually makes the news the educated conservatives who have researched Islam’s sacred texts (Quran & Hadith) immediately point out the driving factor behind the atrocity which is Mohammed’s clear teachings to commit violence against non-believers! When we do we are met with the same old abusive slurs from the politicians These baseless slurs include accusations like , “Nazi, Bigot, Islamophobe, intolerant, far right, white supremacist etc BUT when the New Zealand Christchurch massacre occurred these same low IQ traitors will don a head scarf, play the Islamic call to prayer over a whole nation and of course repeat the same mantra, when a Muslim kills Christian people its because they have been insulted by the Islamaphobes. In other words, if a Muslim kills people in the name of Allah, it’s our fault! If a white, left wing supremacist kills muslims, again it’s our fault!

We have to vote the right way at this election or dig a hole as there is no where to run to. We will be the ones waking up to the realisation that we have lost our Rights, lost our country and eventually lose our families and our lives as one way or another from internal or external threats we are superfluous to requirements, fanatic do not need us. So chose wisely and encourage others to vote for the Defence of your nation, your Rights and your families.

We citizens are the first responders, we are the ones who wake up and find an intruder in our homes.  Firemen, ambulance men are great, but it takes nothing away from their heroism to point out that the title “first responder” is a misnomer, they only take the bodies away. The people on site are the first responders and we all have a duty to respond.

We would not expect someone else to vote for us, nor would we expect someone else to do National service in the armed force for them. Some duties of human obligation should never be outsourced. If you are an able-bodied adult, it’s your duty to know how to stop the bleeding and give CPR until the professionals who do it for a living arrive. And it’s your duty (and right) to defend yourself, your family, your community and your Constitution. With any means at your disposal, guns are one of the best, which sometimes might mean your concealed pistol or your first call “defence firearm”. (which some idiots might call an ‘Assault rifle’)

With the threats that Australia is facing, it is now more than ever that we should be insisting that it is compulsory for all non-criminal (and all the rest should be locked up, or pending extradition) adult, able-bodied citizens should own a firearm and become proficient with them.

The Australia government could easily, and not before time, make them available at a subsidies cost and encourage rifle range and instructors to begin a mass education in home defence, because the law and order that we see is only a thin veneer and it can disappear in a heartbeat. In famine, flood, or internal or external war looting, plunder rape and murder are only resisted with firearms. It’s your duty to be a first responder be prepared to defend our communities. It is your duty as being a citizen of a free country. (if we can keep it that way).  We all should be ready and able to pick up a firearm. Whether it’s a riots and disaster, or whether it’s some terrorist who decides to shoot up your church, or a shopping mall, it’s on you. We all have a job to do when chaos comes, no shirking your responsibility and outsourcing it to the local police or the Army, they will never be there on time.

Being a citizen is not a spectator sport.
The socialist do not see things that way. The mere idea of a good person with a gun makes them vomit. The socialist hates the notion that we citizens might take personal ownership of, and responsibility for, the security of our own families, communities, or our nation. Even if we had an effective defence force, we all have a human and constitutional right, in fact a duty, to have the means to defend ourselves, our families and our communities. The socialists need us all to be compliant dependent on their handouts, their veneer of security that only works one way, to secure the State control over the people, but millions of us must remember are impossible to control, unless we consent to it.

This man is the best for the Big Job. Fraser Anning for PM.

Fraser Anning Firearm Policy is the Best in this election. to download please click on it.
The good men who prepared the Bill of Rights for the King and Queen to sign and seal for all time enshrined the natural right of free men to have arms suitable for their defence, the rights of free speech, free elections and the freedom of religion, knew that without these Rights none of it was worth the paper it was written on. The elite socialist wants slaves, not citizens. They recognise the threat in our possession of firearms. But it’s not the threat of us all causing evil, but of us resisting it. An armed people are a free people, and a free people demand their rights to have their say in their own governance. We want our Freedoms, the Right to Free Speech, the Right to Petition, the Right to Free Elections, the Right to Self Defence, the Rights to own the property we have worked for, but what the Socialists really want is total control over all of us.
Ron Owen

“whenever the Legislators endeavor to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience, and are left to the common Refuge, which God hath provided for all Men, against Force and Violence. Whensoever therefore the Legislative shall transgress this fundamental Rule of Society; and either by Ambition, Fear, Folly or Corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other an Absolute Power over the Lives, Liberties, and Estates of the People; By this breach of Trust they forfeit the Power, the People had put into their hands, for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty.” John Locke

……………………………………….
Any Inquiries on any products phone 07 54824099 or 07 54825070 or email owenguns@spiderweb.com.au