The Greatest Lie in Australia

Police Seizure Abuse - The Loose Cannon.

Although I once defied the odds and got nought out of thirty in an open book multiple choice Chemistry test, leading to me studying law and not an agricultural science, Newton’s third law ‘for every reaction there is an equal and opposite reaction’, has always appealed to me, because at least on one level it applies to human and organisational behaviour and not just objects.

Thus when Police are affected by something they react.

Most readers would be familiar with the Edwards tragedy last year.  Mr Edwards was granted a special Commissioner's Permit for a handgun, against the wishes of a gun club he had previously approached, and then he went oput and commited a murder suicide soon after.  Further compounding the tragedy, his distraught former spouse committed suicide earlier this year. 

Police did not blame themselves for granting the permit, and are now targeting anyone who shoots and who is involved in a Family Law break up.

Case in point, I am acting for a small dealer at present who is in the process of going through a break up with his spouse.  The parties are separated under the one roof.

On my instructions his former partner was somewhat jealous because he was having a discussion and was actively engaged in play with his son. His wife’s mother suggested she call Police, which she proceeded to do.

Police attended, and as no threat was made, and there was no apprehension of violence, no AVO was issued.

Nevertheless, my client’s licence was suspended.  The reason on the suspension was ‘child at risk’- yet there was on these facts no evidence of this.  The only thing that happened that night that would have been scary to a child was the arrival of two Police Officers after the child’s bed time - although I stress that in this particular situation the officers behaved commendably well, and only followed instructions.

Not every child in a break up is a child at risk, and if Police wanted to target children at risk their attention would be better spent visiting shopping centres and rounding up truanting children during the day, and getting tired drivers off the road.

As you may be aware, Police policy of seizure, for a ‘cooling off period’ of 28 days, does not appear to have any statutory basis and any seizure of firearms needs to comply with Firearms Act 1996 or the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002.

The Police power to suspend a Firearms licence is set out in paragraph 22 of the Firearms Act 1996, and I have set it out below.

22   Suspension of licence

(cf APMC 6, 1989 Act s 35)

(1)  The Commissioner may, if the Commissioner is satisfied there may be grounds for revoking a licence, suspend the licence by serving personally or by post on the licensee a notice:

(a)  stating that the licence is suspended and the reasons for suspending it, and

(b)  requesting that the person provide the Commissioner with reasons why the licence should not be revoked.

(1A) If a licence is being suspended because the Commissioner is satisfied that there may be grounds for revoking the licence under section 11 (5A), the notice suspending the licence is not required:

(a)  to state the reasons for the suspension, or

(b)  to include any request that the licensee provide the Commissioner with reasons why the licence should not be revoked.

(2)  The Commissioner must suspend a licence in accordance with this section if the Commissioner is aware that the licensee has been charged with a domestic violence offence within the meaning of the Crimes (Domestic and Personal Violence) Act 2007 or the Commissioner has reasonable cause to believe that the licensee has committed or has threatened to commit a domestic violence offence within the meaning of that Act.

(3)  A suspended licence does not authorise the possession or use of firearms during the period specified in the notice suspending it.

Whilst not relevant, I shall set out section 11(5) below for your convenience

11(5) A licence must not be issued to a person who:

(a)  is under the age of 18, or

(b)  has, within the period of 10 years before the application for the licence was made, been convicted in New South Wales or elsewhere of an offence prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the offence is an offence under New South Wales law, or

(c)  is subject to an apprehended violence order or interim apprehended violence order or who has, at any time within 10 years before the application for the licence was made, been subject to an apprehended violence order (other than an order that has been revoked), or

(d)  is subject to a good behaviour bond, whether entered into in New South Wales or elsewhere, in relation to an offence prescribed by the regulations, or

(e)  is subject to a firearms prohibition order, or

(f)  is a registrable person or corresponding registrable person under the Child Protection (Offenders Registration) Act 2000.

Turning to the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 which again relevantly provides:

      20   Relevant offences

The following offences are relevant offences for the purposes of this Division:

       (a)  indictable offences,

       (b)  an offence against section 93FB of the Crimes Act 1900,

       (c)  an offence against the Weapons Prohibition Act 1998, the Firearms Act 1996, or a regulation made under either of those Acts,

       (d)  an offence against a provision of Part 2 of the Explosives Act 2003.

      21   Power to search persons and seize and detain things without warrant

      (cf Crimes Act 1900, ss 357, 357E, Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, s 37)

       (1)  A police officer may, without a warrant, stop, search and detain a person, and anything in the possession of or under the control of the person, if the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds that any of the following circumstances exists:

       (a)  the person has in his or her possession or under his or her control anything stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained,

       (b)  the person has in his or her possession or under his or her control anything used or intended to be used in or in connection with the commission of a relevant offence,

       (c)  the person has in his or her possession or under his or her control in a public place a dangerous article that is being or was used in or in connection with the commission of a relevant offence,

       (d)  the person has in his or her possession or under his or her control, in contravention of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985, a prohibited plant or a prohibited drug.

       (2)  A police officer may seize and detain:

       (a)  all or part of a thing that the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds is stolen or otherwise unlawfully obtained, and

       (b)  all or part of a thing that the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds may provide evidence of the commission of a relevant offence, and

       (c)  any dangerous article, and

       (d)  any prohibited plant or prohibited drug in the possession or under the control of a person in contravention of the Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985,

       found as a result of a search under this section.

      22   Power to seize and detain dangerous articles on premises

      (cf Crimes Act 1900, s 357)

A police officer who is lawfully on any premises may seize and detain any dangerous article that the police officer finds on the premises, if the police officer suspects on reasonable grounds that the dangerous article is being or was used in or in connection with the commission of a relevant offence.

 Premises include vessels, vehicles, aircraft and other places.

       The difficulty for Police here is that while a firearm is a dangerous article within the meaning of s21(2)(c) there is no relevant offence, nor is there any suspicion on reasonable grounds that the article is or was used in commission of an offence (s22).

After realising that they were on shakey grounds a Sergeant rang my client, alluded to gaol, and referenced the following alleged offences, none of which are supported by available evidence.

1.     That my client was in possession of 14 unregistered firearms.  This allegation was denied.  My client had completed all PAB28 and 31 paperwork as required by legislation as required and had forwarded these to the Registry by Registered Post.  My client also completed his quarterly return with respect to these entries and forwarded the quarterly return to the Registry by Registered Post.  Apparently, Police wish to hold my client responsible for processing tardiness at their Registry.

     That my client was in possession of a number of prohibited firearms specifically firearms fitted with a folding stock. Allegation admitted. My client is authorised by virtue of his dealer licence to possess prohibited firearms no 11 of Sch 1 of the Firearms Act 1996, item 11 are any firearms fitted with a folding stock.

1.     That my client was informed he would be asked why one firearm had a defaced serial number.  Upon entering details of all firearms acquired by my client the physical serial number of the firearm was sighted at all times when making these entries.  My client can answer no explanation why one has a defaced serial number he questions if part of a serial number may be partially obscured by a stock.  I requested further particulars.
2.     The Sergeant informed my client that his decision to suspend my client in the morning of 9 May 2019 was supported by an allegation involving matrimonial property.  On the 8 May 2019 attending Police referred to this as a civil matter, and it was not raised as a complaint until the afternoon of the 9 May 2019. For this reason, this allegation was not raised on the Suspension Notice and had no bearing upon the decision to suspend.

My criticism is with a Police Policy in practice in respect to domestic situations that exceeds the law, and that involves the seizure of firearms without probable cause merely on suspicion of a domestic break up. 

Just because Firearms ownership is a privilege and not a right, does not mean that privilege is subject to unfettered discretion by Police to seize firearms or suspend licences without appropriate due process.

When I first came to Australia, I was amazed how far this country has progressed since it was a penal colony, a mere couple of hundred years ago.  However the longer I practice law, the more convinced I am that my assumption is wrong, for certainly in terms of Police attitude, this state is still a Penal Colony.

Simon Munslow

National Firearms Lawyer
P: (02) 6299 9690
M: 0427 280 962
E: solicitor@bigpond.com
W: firearmslawyer.com.au

Simon Munslow is a lawyer who has a lifelong interest in shooting, having acquired his first firearm at the age of nine, and has had an active interest in firearms law since writing a thesis on the topic over thirty years ago at University.
Simon Munslow practices extensively in Firearms Law matters throughout Australia.

He is a regular contributor to the Australian Sporting Shooter magazine’s website on Firearms law matters, has published articles on firearms reviews and firearms law, and occasionally is asked to comment in the broader media on firearms matters.

This article is written for general information only and does not constitute advice. 
He can assist you with:

Criminal law & Administrative law and in particular that related to Firearms

• All firearms, weapons and game charges
• Avoiding & setting aside Apprehended Violence Orders
• Possession of unregistered firearms
• Unsafe transportation & storage matters
• Applications for prohibited weapons
• License Appeals
• Freedom of Information / Government Public Access matters
• Importation & Customs problems
• Advices & opinions related to Firearms law matters

Read more at http://www.sportingshooter.com.au/latest/police-seizure-abuse-the-loose-cannon#iq2kiJvR6Pw57ZCw.99
http://www.sportingshooter.com.au/latest/police-seizure-abuse-the-loose-cannon

Thoughts for the week By Ron Owen of Owen Guns. 15 May 2019

Thoughts For The Week.

“What you do in your lifetime will echo down through eternity”,
Marcus Aurelius.

Is it About Suppression?
On the 18th of May we have choices to make in our Federal Election. There are two choices, two examples of people that Australians can aim to imitate. One is to be free citizens, armed and sovereign. The other is to be a slave, disarmed and obedient to our socialist elite, master-class. Please chose wisely.

In some ways we have more choices than at any previous federal elections since Federation, but be careful, what you see is not always what you get. Sadly there is a concerted effort by Media and Politicians to suppress the issues and keep a tight lid on all evidence, information and opinions that go towards weakening the major parties control of our freedoms.

British Bill of Rights 1889. still in All Australian State law books.

The suppression is so successful that even people in the Shooters, Fishers and Farmers party don’t believe we have any Rights.
One of the Rights we have left is the one that makes the major parties most vulnerable, that is the Right to vote. The only way we can utilise that Right is by having the Right to Free Speech, the free inter-exchange of information. This is the battleground of the 21st Century.

These Rights and our Rights for Subject to have Arms for our Defence are all acknowledged as pre existing in our Bill of Rights of 1689 which is installed in the Statute law of every State of Australia within the Imperial Acts Application Acts. Heavily suppressed and only dragged out when politicians are taken to task for defamation, as to their own legal protection.

https://www.foaa.com.au/our-rights-where-do-they-come-from/

https://www.foaa.com.au/our-bill-of-rights/

Subjects’ arms—That the subjects which are Protestants may have arms for their defence suitable to their conditions and as allowed by law.

Freedom of election—That election of members of Parliament ought to be free.

Freedom of speech—That the freedom of speech and debates or proceedings in Parliament ought not to be impeached or questioned in any court or place out of Parliament.

Right to petition—That it is the right of the subjects to petition the King and all commitments and prosecutions for such petitioning are illegall.

Note.( The Bill of Rights acknowledges that Catholic’s had the Right to be Armed as well in a previous section).

It is impossible for the Right of Freedom of Speech not to be a general Right as it is necessary to Petition and necessary for the Freedom of Election. Of course the power that guarantees all of these Rights is the Crown, our current head of State – Queen Elizabeth II. That is why our socialist intelligencers are so eager to dispose of our Constitution and impose one of their own manufacture.

That’s him the one on the left, green on the outside and red inside.

The Greens leader Richard Di Natale has promised his supporters he wants to close down Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones and I’m sure that any distributer of information that he did not believe in, would be included in his efforts. Di Natale seems to believe that anyone who does not agree with him is evil, supposedly we all divide Australians with our “hate speech”.

The enemy are in ‘damage control’, they appreciate the losses they have sustained due to Facebook, Twitter and Instagram, the major news channels are screaming at the politicians to control the internet, for as well as losing income they are losing control of people minds. ‘Fake News’ by mainstream media is exposed in seconds by people on the spot with a mobile phone. For example we could see for ourselves that Tommy Robinson activist (seen on more than one mobile phone),was just standing in the street when he was arrested, so when we read the nonsense written in newspapers and hear it on the six o clock news, we all know that its rubbish. This example has been repeated a million times and it exposes what the Major media will do to ignore the truth and manufacture it’s own version to suit their agenda.

The major Politicians’ have woken up, probably provoked by their banker paymasters and have legislated to control the internet, just recently 30 prominent activists including Tommy Robinson, Louis Farrakhan, Alex Jones Lauren Southern, Jeremy Boreing, Infowars, Paul Nehlen, Milo Yiannopoulos, Paul Joseph Watson and Laura Loomer and even Ron Owen have been banned from Facebook. Even President Trump has complained about the silencing Free Speech and criticised Facebook as they have particularly silenced the Conservative spokes people who appear to have done no wrong. I was banned from Facebook for sharing a photograph of my daughters 8 week old puppy.

I asked for reviews but of course the review is blocked. https://www.smh.com.au/world/north-america/trump-attacks-social-media-companies-after-facebook-bans-20190505-p51k5t.html

Foreign Nations and Big Money Want to Control Our Communications.

To offset our attempts of free speech on the internet the George Soros types, the Big End of the New World Order have responded by pouring millions of dollars into “Get Back” to offset the ongoing damage of small internet media.

Al Jazeera has recently attacked the One Nation main senate hopeful and its mindless adviser James Ashby, with some justification I might add, as they could have checked the credentials of the false Firearm Lobbyist with just one phone call, and to behaved so poorly in the USA is an embarrassment for all Australians. However, if it is wrong for the NRA to buy into Australian Politics, it’s wrong for China to buy Australian Senator’s like Sam Dastyari and Captain Pierre Yang MP ( Western Australia upper house), and it’s wrong for George Soros to fund Gun Control Australia and “Get Up” and Friend of the ABC, then it is also very wrong for a foreign news agency Al Jazeera to plan a scam to lure two One Nation party members on the false pretext of obtaining $10 million in campaign funds. The scam worked Dickson and Ashby should not have had a bar of that proposal especially as One Nation Federal Firearm Policy is no better to the Labor and LNP policy, as it just says it does not want further legislation put on to law abiding shooters, and has refused to change it when they have been implored by Australian shooting associations. (Maybe its because they have not been offered the 10 million).

Al Jazeera is owned by Qatar, they do not have Australia’s best interests at heart they have the Arab/Islamic Qatar interests that control them. Its expensive to buy into a position of media power in any country the Emir of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Khalifa, provided a loan of QAR 500 million (US$137 million) to sustain Al Jazeera through its first five years. Shares are now held by private investors as well as the Qatar government, but the world power it wields is worth every penny, as they have TV news coverage, USA, Europe, Africa, Middle East, Russia and Australia, only China will keep them out. US137 million oil dollars is small change to influence political decisions in your favour.

Australia’s Pinnnicheo

Please do not think that the ABC is NOT Biased.

Just at the Federal Level. (If you add the State Personalities it is worse.)

A friend sent me this list…

Why Does Labor Protect the ABC.

· Why does the ABC Left media protect the left?

· Because the political commentators of the Left media are either intermingled or married to the left politicians.

· It’s a family thing and they protect their own:

· Greg Combet (Labor) partnered to Juanita Phillips (ABC).

· Gai Brodtmann (Labor) married to Chris Uhlmann (ABC)

· David Feeney (Labor) married to Liberty Sanger (guest commentator on ABC)

· Barry Cassidy (ABC) former speech writer for Bob Hawke (Labor) from 1986-1991

· Heather Ewart (ABC) married to Barry Cassidy (ABC) speech writer for Bob Hawke (Labor) from 1986-1991

· Maxine McKew (ABC) married to Bob Hogg (former ALP national secretary)

· Maxine McKew (ABC) became Labor politician replacing John Howard for one term only.

· Virginia Trioli (ABC) married to Russell Skelton (The Age)

· Mark Kenny (Fairfax) married to Virginia Haussegger (ABC)

· Christine Wallace (ABC & Fairfax) married to Michael Costello (former Chief of Staff to Labor’s Kim Beazley)

· Annabel Crabb (former Fairfax journalist now with the ABC)

· Tony Jones (ABC) married to Sarah Ferguson (ABC) Coincidentally Jones took over the Lateline role from Maxine McKew (from ABC presenter to Labor politician)

· David Penberthy (journalist) married to Kate Ellis (Labor)

· Paul Kelly (former Fairfax journalist) formerly married to Ros Kelly (Labor)

· Kerry O’Brien (ABC) former press secretary to Gough Whitlam.

· Mark Colvin (ABC) married to Michelle McKenzie (Leichhardt deputy-mayor and Greens Councillor)

· Denis Atkins (ABC Insiders regular) married to Melanie Christensen (ABC Canberra)

· Paul Barry (ABC) married to Lisa McGregor (ABC)

· The lamentable Mike Carlton (formerly Fairfax formally ABC) partners Morag Ramsay (ABC)

· Andrew Fraser (Fairfax) and Catriona Jackson (formerly Fairfax and Labor press secretary)

· And so the list goes on. Labor, Fairfax and the ABC are joined at the hip.

Much like the relationship between Labor and the unions, but they’re on YOUR Aussie payroll. Now you know why Bill Shorten wants to increase your Taxes. To fund his propaganda and jaundiced news.

https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/31677-trump-climate-panel-could-expose-huge-fraud-hence-the-hysteria?fbclid=IwAR3pZ7pURanUecABfT47OpzGuUUDxxbLB54uayLNTjB2v-wqrkw8_nt6maA#

While the Major Political Parties Are Boring Us to Death With Climate Change Australia faces the greatest challenges since World War Two.
High-tech Chinese ships are mapping waters close to Papua New Guinea and at the same time the United States and Australia (after begging China to remove its bases from the International waters of the Spratly Islands) begin to upgrade a naval base on Manus Island which is just north of New Guinea. Besides the territorial waters of the Spratly Islands dominating the South China Sea which a third of the worlds shipping passes through annually ( 3 Trillion dollars worth), the Islands float on an underground sea of oil and gas. So China is not going to give them up, they are also a great stepping stone to the oil fields of Brunei, Sarawak, Borneo, this was the great plum that Japan needed and in 1938 it sent its Pearl Diving fleet to map out these intricate coastlines throughout Australia’s northern approaches.

Cardinal Points.

•Chinese ships deployed to waters near Manus Island as Australia and US announce naval base upgrades

•The vessels are among a large fleet increasing its surveys around the Philippines, Palau, Guam and Japan

•Experts believe the information could be crucial in any future maritime conflict

The Big Issues For This Election is External Threats and Our Defence Forces Paints its Finger nails ‘Pink’.

The deep-water Chinese scientific surveys are part of Beijing’s unprecedented oceanographic research of the Western Pacific, in an area experts believe could be crucial in any future maritime conflict. Military analysis of GPS satellite data reveals two Chinese research vessels entered Papua New Guinea Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) north of Manus Island, just weeks after US Vice President Mike Pence announced a joint redevelopment of the ageing Lombrum naval base. The ships involved, the Ke Xue and Hai Ce 3301, are part of a two-dozen strong Chinese “Distant-Ocean Research fleet” that has conducted expansive maritime surveys around the Philippines, Palau, Guam and Japan over the past two years.

Navel experts say the activities in Papua New Guinea’s EEZ indicates “bathymetric data collection” taking place. High-tech Chinese ships are mapping waters close to Papua New Guinea just as the United States and Australia begin upgrading a naval base on Manus Island.

Australian Defence Force March at Sydney’s Gay Mardi Gras.

Australia’s Defence Department are planning for short-term troop deployments to the former Australian territory. About 30 Australian army officers are already embedded with the PNG Defence Force (PNGDF), but that number is down significantly on past decades.

In between Gay Mardi Gras Marches and sex changes Australian soldiers could soon begin regular military rotations to Papua New Guinea as anxiety over China’s growing influence in the Pacific region continues to rise. In the 20th Century we used to call the Air Force the Brylcreem boys, they could afford it, we considered them posh and slightly effeminate, but they got the girls and succeeded in getting their work done. Now, in Australia the RAAF men are ordered to paint their fingernails pink in support of a queer type of feminism.

War with Indonesia, North Korea, or even the island of Singapore would be terminal, but war with China, well our best bargaining tool would be that they might not want to ruin the properties that they already own here such as the Port of Melbourne and the Port of Darwin, and two airports in Western Australia.  They have spent billions in mining sites, they are the largest foreign owner of Australia’s real estate, they own city water supplies, electrical power distribution and power stations.  They are really miffed that Huawei was prevented from taking over our 5 G telecommunication system. The Garnaut-ASIO report, finished in mid-2017 and never released, uncovered damning new evidence of interference and influence involving Chinese government officials and separately, Communist Party-aligned businessmen seeking political favours and access.

“We’ve had multiple briefings at the top secret level from ASIO and other agencies that foreign interference is being conducted in Australia at an unprecedented level,” Mr Hastie said.

Liberal MP Andrew Hastie, who chaired the parliamentary committee on intelligence and security where they pushed through new counter-interference reforms in 2018, has made the most-strident comments about Beijing to emerge from the Morrison government.

“There are several authoritarian states who are involved in foreign influence across the globe. But in Australia the Chinese Communist Party is probably the most active … China is seeking to influence our elites, particularly our political and business elites, such as Senator Sam Dastyari in order to achieve their strategic objectives.

Even the Australian Army is a target for the Chinese fifth column, Captain Pierre Yang MP ( Western Australia upper house) had to either resign from the parliament of Western Australia, or resign from his association with the Chinese Communist Party fronts. He stated, “I resigned as a member of both the Northeast China Federation and the Association of Great China,” he said in a statement after a story about the memberships was published by News Corp.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6466603/Labor-MP-Pierre-Yang-breaks-tears-hits-Chinese-spy-ship-reports.html

Mr Yang spent 49 days on a Chinese navel vessel, citing security experts as saying the vessel may have been conducting spying activities. This Chinese ship was engaged, like the ones mentioned above to chart the northern islands coastline but was taken from these duties to look for the missing Malaysian airliner in the Indian Ocean.

Labor Premier Mark McGowan stated, “it speaks volumes of him,””His proud service for this country, serving as a Captain of the Australian Army Reserve” “I would be certain that the ASIO and the relevant defence agencies have vetted an officer in the army reserve.” Maybe they were the ones that raised the issue of his membership to Associations run by the Chinese Communist Party, we can only hope.

The Nancy looking, Chief of Army David Morrison has not a care for our nations security and makes statements like.

“The Defence Force did not reflect contemporary Australian society, and with women representing just 12 per cent of the army workforce it was making “lousy” use of the talent on offer, Lieutenant General Morrison told ABC TV.

He said undue emphasis on Anzac stories that were “overwhelmingly white, overwhelmingly male, overwhelmingly Anglo-Saxon” risked alienating women and indigenous and ethnic Australians, who were currently under-represented in the army.”

If General Morrison’s logic is right – that is the current members of the Army aren’t good enough because the talent lies with ethnic indigenous women etc, al – then let him point to his Army’s stuff-ups. Let him tell us which operational situations we screwed up because we were too white and Anglo Saxon. Where would we have done better if we were more feminine, more black or more ethnic – Gallipoli? The Western Front? Kokoda? Long Tan?

The Army’s pointy bit is the Royal Australian Corps of Infantry – mostly in the Royal Australian Regiment and the Special Air Service Regiment. The role of the infantry is to seek out and close with the enemy, to kill or capture him, to seize and hold ground, to repel attack, by day or night, regardless of season, weather or terrain. I do not know many ladies interested in plunging bayonets into withering screaming flesh, nor do I want to meet them, but if they are out there, I can hardly see that there would be enough of them to improve the defence force, which is really short of trained men, arms and materials. They do not need any more lipstick and finger nail paint we need the leader of our Army to be a soldier, not a social engineer.

It’s a Mental Disorder!
It take millions of dollars to take a good man from ‘civvy’ street and train him to lead men in combat, but they are resigning from the Force as they are forced to salute men with the 5 o’clock shadow, dressed in skirted women’s uniform wearing lipstick and a wig.

Rear Admiral Hammond said “the navy needed to look at a range of measures — from supporting women’s sporting events to -reviewing procedures for unconscious gender bias.

“We must do this as one navy, regardless of age, rank, race, religion, sexual orientation, ability or gender,” he said. “We cannot afford to leave anyone behind.” Well you would not want them behind you would you?
Dr. Paul McHugh, former head of psychiatry at Johns Hopkins, calls transgender feelings a disorder of assumption similar to that experienced by emaciated anorexics who consider themselves obese and literally starve themselves to death.
“‘Sex change’ is biologically impossible,” said McHugh. “People who undergo sex-reassignment surgery do not change from men to women or vice versa. Rather, they become feminized men or masculinized women. Claiming that this is civil-rights matter and encouraging surgical intervention is in reality to collaborate with and promote a mental disorder.”

Threats to Our Human Rights, Threats to our External Security and one of the Greatest Threats is our Internal Security.
In Australia we already have NO GO areas for Non Muslims. Area’s where White anglo saxons, especially people with fair, or red hair are targets for harassment or violence. Police even stop them from walking down those streets and threaten to arrest the white people for disturbing the peace. Please do not think that the rest of Australia is not a Target for an Islamic take over. We should have a great big Goodbye Australia party for the Islamic’ just tell them that those willing to take the Oath of Allegiance to Queen Elisabeth II as per the words in the Commonwealth Constitution, those who put their allegiance to other objectives well they can sail somewhere else. I will bring the bacon!

Invasion by Gradualism.

This is how they have moved in on Britain.
This is the way the British people have passively succumbed to the Muslim invasion:

Mayor of London … Muslim

Mayor of Birmingham … Muslim

Mayor of Leeds … Muslim

Mayor of Blackburn … Muslim

Mayor of Sheffield … Muslim

Mayor of Oxford … Muslim

Mayor of Luton …. Muslim

Mayor of Oldham … Muslim

Mayor of Rochdale … Muslim

All of the following achieved by just 4 Million Muslims out of the 66 Million population:

Over 3,000 Muslim Mosques

Over 130 Muslim Sharia Courts

Over 50 Muslim Sharia Councils

Muslims Only No-Go Areas across the UK

Muslim Women … 78% don’t work and are on free Benefits / Housing

Muslim Men … 63% Don’t work and are on free Benefits / Housing

Muslim Families … 6-8 children planning to go on free Benefits / Housing.

All UK Schools are serving free Halal food .

Yet here in Australia we can’t decide to vote for someone with the right immigration policy.

Fraser Anning and his good wife Fiona visiting the Owen Guns Trust museum. He is the man to change the direction of this country for the better.

In 1933 the 70 percent of the German people woke up to find that less than 30 percent who had voted placed the National Socialists Workers Party and Hitler as the new Chancellor, like Britain and even here with compulsory voting, lots of people did not bother to vote. Millions more did not even bother to find out the policies of the people they voted for. Some of the Candidates did not even understand or know the policies that they were standing for. That is still the case in Australia is 2019.

In Germany in 1933 the non caring people, those not in the Nazi Party gradually found that their world of comfort, peace and freedom had come to an end and instead they understood that they belonged to the State, and they had lost control of their own and their families destiny. A few years later the fanatical minority plunged the Germany into a devastating and costly world war, and by the end of the war the survivors had woken up to a another reality – they had lost everything for nothing.

They had lost everything for nothing.
I see the same situation playing out today with respect to the attitude of the majority, maybe 51 % towards the expansionist Islamist movement. We are told again and again by politicians and ‘bimbos and bimbettes’ on the TV that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. This unqualified assertion may be true, but the fact is that it is entirely irrelevant! It is meaningless hot air, meant to send us back to sleep again, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that, same as Germany in 1933, the fanatics rule Islam and have ruled it since 623 AD. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who are waging any one of the 50 shooting wars currently going on worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian, Buddhist, Hindu, or tribal groups in Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, and carry out the so called honour killing. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers. The hard and quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the ‘silent majority,’ has been cowed and made extraneous and irrelevant.” That is the same as Australia, Apathy is used by experts. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million of their own people. The peaceful majority were silent, irrelevant. China’s huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million of its own citizens. The average Japanese family, prior to and during World War II, was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians, most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. Cambodia, Rwanda, all collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans, and Cambodians were ‘peace loving people?

True history is incredibly simple and blunt, thousands of years of genocide. Yet for all our modern education with infinite resources to libraries of information and powers of reason, we miss the most basic messages, peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy, if they don’t speak up, (and already they are very scared) they will wake up, one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun. Peace loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late.

So to here in Australia, if the peace loving, apathetic, hangers on do not awake to the reality of their circumstances they will be rubbed out extinguished, or forced to be a slave of Islam.

Islamic prayers have now been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too while the Lord’s Prayer was removed due to being so offensive! But to whom? Not to the vast majority of Canadians but to the few Islamic fanatics!

The Islamic way is only peaceful until the fanatics move in and take control. In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items now have the halal emblem on them. (i.e a sign or instruction that says this product can be eaten, consumed or used by Islamics).   Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food products in your local supermarket. Foods on aircraft have the halal emblem, and it is not just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding throughout the world but every time we unclean unbelievers buy those items a part of the costs goes to the Islamic foundations for supporting terrorism for training more terrorists. It is funding fanatics.

In Britain, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of no-go zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuses to acknowledge British law. As for we who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts, the fanatics who threaten our way of life.

When an Islamic atrocity actually makes the news the educated conservatives who have researched Islam’s sacred texts (Quran & Hadith) immediately point out the driving factor behind the atrocity which is Mohammed’s clear teachings to commit violence against non-believers! When we do we are met with the same old abusive slurs from the politicians These baseless slurs include accusations like , “Nazi, Bigot, Islamophobe, intolerant, far right, white supremacist etc BUT when the New Zealand Christchurch massacre occurred these same low IQ traitors will don a head scarf, play the Islamic call to prayer over a whole nation and of course repeat the same mantra, when a Muslim kills Christian people its because they have been insulted by the Islamaphobes. In other words, if a Muslim kills people in the name of Allah, it’s our fault! If a white, left wing supremacist kills muslims, again it’s our fault!

We have to vote the right way at this election or dig a hole as there is no where to run to. We will be the ones waking up to the realisation that we have lost our Rights, lost our country and eventually lose our families and our lives as one way or another from internal or external threats we are superfluous to requirements, fanatic do not need us. So chose wisely and encourage others to vote for the Defence of your nation, your Rights and your families.

We citizens are the first responders, we are the ones who wake up and find an intruder in our homes.  Firemen, ambulance men are great, but it takes nothing away from their heroism to point out that the title “first responder” is a misnomer, they only take the bodies away. The people on site are the first responders and we all have a duty to respond.

We would not expect someone else to vote for us, nor would we expect someone else to do National service in the armed force for them. Some duties of human obligation should never be outsourced. If you are an able-bodied adult, it’s your duty to know how to stop the bleeding and give CPR until the professionals who do it for a living arrive. And it’s your duty (and right) to defend yourself, your family, your community and your Constitution. With any means at your disposal, guns are one of the best, which sometimes might mean your concealed pistol or your first call “defence firearm”. (which some idiots might call an ‘Assault rifle’)

With the threats that Australia is facing, it is now more than ever that we should be insisting that it is compulsory for all non-criminal (and all the rest should be locked up, or pending extradition) adult, able-bodied citizens should own a firearm and become proficient with them.

The Australia government could easily, and not before time, make them available at a subsidies cost and encourage rifle range and instructors to begin a mass education in home defence, because the law and order that we see is only a thin veneer and it can disappear in a heartbeat. In famine, flood, or internal or external war looting, plunder rape and murder are only resisted with firearms. It’s your duty to be a first responder be prepared to defend our communities. It is your duty as being a citizen of a free country. (if we can keep it that way).  We all should be ready and able to pick up a firearm. Whether it’s a riots and disaster, or whether it’s some terrorist who decides to shoot up your church, or a shopping mall, it’s on you. We all have a job to do when chaos comes, no shirking your responsibility and outsourcing it to the local police or the Army, they will never be there on time.

Being a citizen is not a spectator sport.
The socialist do not see things that way. The mere idea of a good person with a gun makes them vomit. The socialist hates the notion that we citizens might take personal ownership of, and responsibility for, the security of our own families, communities, or our nation. Even if we had an effective defence force, we all have a human and constitutional right, in fact a duty, to have the means to defend ourselves, our families and our communities. The socialists need us all to be compliant dependent on their handouts, their veneer of security that only works one way, to secure the State control over the people, but millions of us must remember are impossible to control, unless we consent to it.

This man is the best for the Big Job. Fraser Anning for PM.

Fraser Anning Firearm Policy is the Best in this election. to download please click on it.
The good men who prepared the Bill of Rights for the King and Queen to sign and seal for all time enshrined the natural right of free men to have arms suitable for their defence, the rights of free speech, free elections and the freedom of religion, knew that without these Rights none of it was worth the paper it was written on. The elite socialist wants slaves, not citizens. They recognise the threat in our possession of firearms. But it’s not the threat of us all causing evil, but of us resisting it. An armed people are a free people, and a free people demand their rights to have their say in their own governance. We want our Freedoms, the Right to Free Speech, the Right to Petition, the Right to Free Elections, the Right to Self Defence, the Rights to own the property we have worked for, but what the Socialists really want is total control over all of us.
Ron Owen

“whenever the Legislators endeavor to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience, and are left to the common Refuge, which God hath provided for all Men, against Force and Violence. Whensoever therefore the Legislative shall transgress this fundamental Rule of Society; and either by Ambition, Fear, Folly or Corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other an Absolute Power over the Lives, Liberties, and Estates of the People; By this breach of Trust they forfeit the Power, the People had put into their hands, for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty.” John Locke

……………………………………….
Any Inquiries on any products phone 07 54824099 or 07 54825070 or email owenguns@spiderweb.com.au

Thoughts For The Week By Ron Owen.

Thoughts For The Week.

“Nothing that is achieved from human progress is achieved with unanimous consent, and those that are enlightened before the others are condemned to pursue that light, in spite of others.” Christopher Columbus

My first thought is to express my sympathy for the bereaved and wounded from the Islamic attacks on the civilians of Manchester, (my home town) and London. I have left these thoughts for some time as I did not want to seem to be competing with the Anti Gun Ghouls who leap on the mass media band wagon after every massacre and repeatedly tear through the blood and entrails with bared teeth trying to get every ounce of gun banning trumpery regurgitated.

They Work Like Two Hungry Wolves Tearing A Milking Cow Apart One At Each End.

Why do our politicians cry peace, when we all know our enemy within, wants to kill us all? Why won’t our politicians deport the suspects? Why do they invite more killers to come to Australia, when they know that these disciples of Islam will work constantly to kill the Australian People?

The Muslim world has been ordered to kill the unbelievers, (that’s all of us) they have found us a soft and easy target. Our cowardly limp wrist’ed, corrupted governments have invited these killers into our community. Commanded by their Mosque mullahs and ordered to kill us by many quotes in the Koran. Encouraged by their successes, we the defenceless can only expect our governments (who have 24 hour armed protection) to sacrifice more of us in the name of cultural diversity.
How many have to die, before we begin to hang our corrupt treasonous politicians? They should be made accountable, for  disarming the community  leaving good people to be murdered, removing their ability to defend themselves and one another.

How long will it take for the Australian people to realise that our politicians are the Demons and the Mad Mullahs are the Devils?

Why do our politicians Cry Peace, when we all know our enemies within, all want WAR.

Within Days, Our Politicians shift the media machine away from Islamic’s murdering innocents with impunity to blaming Firearm Owners by spending millions of our money on a Firearm Amnesty. Its Insulting our Intelligence.

But Where is the Rage?
Obviously, the Flowers and pink Teddy Bears did not work. Nor did the flower power, hippy ‘All we need is love’ and unity messages put out by our treasonous leaders. Within a week they struck again in London and again in Brighton, Melbourne. Governments cultivation of passivity, pours oil on troubled waters, and sends active citizens deeper into slumber land. It diminishes us as citizens, subjugates us to TV Norms and candle-holders in the face of serious acts of violence against our community. This governments softly, softly approach after every terrorist attack is just giving aid and comfort to our attackers. Terrorism pursues a war of attrition against our social fabric, seeking to rip away bit by bit our confidence and openness and sense of ourselves as individual free citizens. Officialdom  with their media again diminish our individuality by instructing us on what we may feel, and think, and say,  discouraging us from confronting these atrocities and the ideological and violent rot behind them. The terrorist seeks to weaken our resolve, the Government wants to tranquilize our rage, withdraw our anger, and reduce us to wet-eyed ninnies.

When are we going to Rage about the dying?
When sadly the Grenfell apartment block accidentally catches alight and kills Muslims, there is no words of unity and  forgiveness, donate a pink teddy bear and lay truck loads of flowers, when its Muslims, the rage is okay, they can have a riot with government assistance. Yet we have to forgive them again.

“Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,

And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,

Do not go gentle into that good night.

Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight

Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,

Rage, rage against the dying of the light.” Dylan Thomas.

We westerners are not allowed to ask why our children died, or rage against their dying. It is becoming clear that the top-down promotion of a hollow togetherness in response to terrorism is about cultivating passivity. As when 20 or 40 innocents are butchered why do our politicians do a “Wag the Dog” and spin it around to blame ‘Islamophobe’s’ or what’s been said on facebook? This is not just an Australian Phenomena it is through-out the Western world. Hilary Clinton and Obama blamed a video that supposedly mocked Islam and the Prophet Mohammed, for the death of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, when everyone with half a brain knew that it was just another planned terror attack. Angela Merkel declares “Islam is not the source of terrorism” but the source is Christians who make Muslims feel angry because of “Islamophobia”
The reality is that the ideology of Islam, is already responsible for the slaughter of at least 270 million non-Muslims, and as to be identified as a Muslim they have to obey the dictates of their holy Quran (Koran) results in worldwide genocide of all who do not agree with them.

Quote, just two of many.

“Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of them”

Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush.”

This book has caused the Muslim Jihads Crusades which for many years conquered and pillaged North Africa, Southern Europe, the Balkans, the Middle East and India. The instructions within their Holy Book is far more devilish than Hitlers Mein Kampf (National Socialism) or Karl Marx Communist Manifesto,(Communist Manifesto). This Quran book is the catalyst for the recent attacks on the western world.

A Turkish friend of mine explained the whole Islamic mentality is training people to judge the rest of humanity, as either a Slave or a Master. If one has more power of any sort, then they are the Master, and must be obeyed, if they personally have more power over another, then they are a Slave and their only purpose is to serve or die.

We cannot keep excusing this behaviour as having nothing to do with Islam. According to Islam’s history, this exact conduct is a deeply inherent, continuing for 1,400 years without ceasing. Without slaughter, Islam has no history or contribution to the world.

Lets get this problem identified, its not a Racial issue, Muslims can be from any race and it is not a religious issue, our enemies unlike any other religions do not want to convert people by good examples, (miracles) by good works, by discussion, this ideology seeks world domination, world control by the application of fear. If you are not one of them and they are strong enough, your only short survival will be as a slave, most and for the majority, surplus to requirements you can only expect death.

All of us are targeted, by controlled suicidal maniacs who are programmed to kill with any tool at their disposal, knives, aircraft, trucks, bombs, guns, poisons, gas. tactics as arson, vehicle rampage attacks, bomb threats, suicide attacks, bombings, shootings, stabbing, highjackings, kidnapping and beheading’s. As it is, most of you will know of someone who has been affected by this latest war, since 1979 over 20,930 people have been killed, and 52,719 plus have been wounded. This war which had its beginnings 1400 years ago, has come to the fore in the last few years and only has signs of escalation, due to government enforced “helplessness” of the general population. Of course our politicians are not the ones being killed, they and their armed police buy the best protection our taxpayers dollars can provide. We are not running from school bullies, we are not all able to run or hide, and more than likely will have no time to tell anyone about it. They use us, as sacrificial lambs, like sending soldiers to war without any ammunition, then sermonise on, togetherness, and pacifistic nonsense, reducing us to a line of bawling pallbearers whose only purpose is to fill the streets with pink balloons, teddy bears and flowers, or hold another candle light vigil in memory of our fellow citizens. The government response to the massacres of over 20,000 civilians is “All you need is love”, and have another Gun Amnesty.

“Don’t let them break our Unity”.
How inverse of them to say that, how ignorant of the facts, we are not unified, the government has allowed a howling rapacious killing machine into our midst and wants to use them as an excuse to totally control us all. Do they really want us to have Unity with our own killers. What are their values, what are our values? Our governments do not want us to have core values that a good society can be built on. They would hate us to be unified that would take away their power, they want us soaked in a grey ABC apathy. That is why they have introduced “diversity”, on a moral and cultural basis.

Admit to having core values in a society designed to operate on diversity, suggest that any particular evil ideology poses a threat to the community and you will be singled out to face the star chamber “Discrimination” Courts. Government’s cry of unity is a lie. The fact is,  there are people in our society willing to attack us, others who will think those attacks are justified, and others still who will apologise for those attacks by saying they are a product of Islamophobia or of Western intervention, when really the object is to end Western civilisation, end freedom, free thought and end individualism. We are far from united. We are deeply divided, but not allowed to say so.

We are all considered expendable.
Governments that no longer guarantee the security of their citizens are worthless, and those that disallow their own citizens the right and the means to defend themselves are worse then negligent, they are clearly dangerous to support in any way. Most people are slowly awakening to this realism, but its more than likely too late to prevent our streets turning into rivers of blood. The government wants us passive, empathetic, upset, not angry, or active, or questioning the disparity between these.  They prefer us as a lonely crowd of dutiful, disconnected griever’s rather than a real collective of citizens demanding to know why our fellow citizens are being killed and how we might prevent others from dying. We have to stop playing the part that they have created for us, we have to remind them of the horrors that they have inflicted on us and vote for change. To do this we have to express Anger? Fury? Rage, if not they will reinforce a mass media forcefield that will blanket out the reality of the revolution that they have introduced in to our national society.

I posted the following on Owen Guns facebook page, it received 22086 hits, and 1032 people shared it within 24 hours. Lots re-posted it using their own names. This idea has been accepted by many thousands of people so please put your name on the first line and send it around to at least your local members of parliament and put it on as many electronic notice boards as possible .

“I Ron Owen a freeborn, law abiding citizen, demand that the right to carry a firearm suitable for defence is reinstated. There is irrefutable facts to prove that for some years a large international group of Islamic fanatics wish to kill us all randomly and that our government is incapable, or does not wish to act, to defend us. I do not want to be sacrificed to a politicians pacifistic idealism, I do not want to go in fear, I have a right to defend my life and the lives of the people I abide with. It is perverse that our people are being butchered in worldwide genocide and our leaders say, love, unity and multiculturalism is the answer, while they are surrounded by tax payer armed guards. If the recent massacre of children and their parents on a fun night out doesn’t make you want to defend yourselves or defend your right to survival, nothing will. The terrorist has defeated you. You are dead already, but you have no right to prevent me from choosing to defend my family.”

NATIONAL FIREARM (Dis) AGREEMENT.
Our Governments response to Terrorism, the cold blooded murder of our fellow Australians by Mad Monis, Lindt Choclate café and others, has not been to extradite all known extremists, close Mosques, or Ban The Quran. No, the response has been a new NFA to pour more impositions on lawful firearm owners. Please read our last Bulletin on Ammunition limits. http://www.owenguns.com/owen-guns-bulletin-may-edition-132-2017/

We have our banner on lodging a protest on Bruce Highway, next to the Owen Guns shop, they cost $250. each.  They are 6 metres long if you have a site and the $250. we will provide the banner. They are vinyl sheeting with ropes attached.

There are many other impositions for collectors and heirlooms please read it all.
The other outcome is the latest Firearm  Amnesty which will begin on the 1st July 2017 and be in place for 3 months.

For many it might seem harmless, but it is another ploy to remove firearms from law abiding citizens, another few million dollars of the tax payers dollars being spent on worrying the good and supporting the evil anti gun movement. Firearms are tools, they can be used for food gathering and defending homes and families. Historically they are safer in peoples homes rather than Police Stations, as many will remember, the AR15 that was supposedly used for the Port Arthur massacre had been handed in during an Amnesty in Victoria and then turned up burned at the Seahaven lodge after Port Arthur.

The whole idea that Criminals are going to hand in their firearms, (which some have cost them in excess of $5000.) because the government has increased the penalties is ludicrous, the idea that Terrorist would feel for one second that they should hand in their firearms is even more preposterous. It’s a waste of time, money and human endeavour, even when the Police record the ones handed over for registration they will more than likely make a mistake, book it down for the wrong person, or its description will be wrong or lose all record of it entirely. I received someone elses licence renewal the other day, maybe someone else has mine. The whole system is fruitless, even the weapons licence, any Crim will find some one to manufacture a licence. We have Police selling hot guns, selling their own guns, and Police selling the information from the registry and the Police Minister lying to members of the house of representatives who requested the number of licenced shooters in his area and the number of licenced shooters in the State of Queensland, or if not lying unable to retrieve the information from the Q Prime Queensland Police Firearm registry. So why bother with a Amnesty unless its to use more publicity against the legitimate Firearm Owners.

Our best response is to encourage anyone who has no home for a firearm to take it to the Licensed Dealers, or Licensed Armorer’s, DO NOT TAKE IT TO THE POLICE, as only destruction will be its fate. Even if its no good at all, some of the parts may assist some one else to keep their firearm. Of course we would love you to donate your firearms to the Owen Guns Trust Museum or give Owen Guns the option of purchasing your firearms, but any LICENCED DEALER should assist you, and might even pay you some money. There are a plethora of firearm owners, collectors and new shooters that would love to give your firearm a new home. DO NOT TAKE IT TO THE POLICE, DO NOT LET THE OTHER SIDE WIN.

There is no Spring without Winter, without Mistakes there is no Learning. There is no Life without Death, without Doubts there is no Faith. There is no Peace without War, without Fear there is no Courage. For without Mistakes, Doubts and Fears there are no pathways to Wisdom.
Ron Owen.