https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/firehose-of-complaints-about-nsw-police-not-investigated-as-watchdog-faces-cuts-20191101-p536jo.html
Showing posts with label freedoms. Show all posts
Showing posts with label freedoms. Show all posts
Sunday, November 3, 2019
'Firehose' of complaints about NSW Police not investigated as watchdog faces cuts!!!
Labels:
Australian police misconduct,
freedoms,
Government corruption,
human rights,
law & order,
Police corruption,
Police violence,
protection,
self defence,
welfare of the people
Location:
Australia
Friday, September 20, 2019
Why the creeping militarisation of our police has experts worried.
Why the creeping
militarisation of our police has experts worried
Australian
police are increasingly being "militarised".
Front-line officers in Queensland and Victoria, and specialist units
across the country, are being trained in military-style tactics and thinking.
Lawyer and former Australian Defence Force officer John Sutton
describes this "convergence" as slow and worrying.
"Typically, a close ideological and operational alliance between
the police force and the military has always been associated with repressive
regimes," he says.
"Australia has a very strong democracy and a very robust civic
mindedness among its population.
"Nevertheless, these developments are certainly
concerning."
So just how concerned should we be? And what's driving the shift?
Labels:
anti-self defence laws,
Australia,
Defenceless,
disarmed,
firearms confiscation,
firearms restrictions,
freedoms,
Government corruption,
gun control,
human rights,
militarisation,
Police,
self defence
Location:
Australia
Monday, July 15, 2019
Thoughts For The Week By Ron Owen. 16th July 2019
Thoughts For The Week.
“Potentially, a Government is the most dangerous threat to man’s rights; for it holds a legal monopoly on the use of physical force against legally disarmed victims.” Ayn Rand
Most of the world has been watching the valiant protests in Hong Kong, young people mainly who oppose the Chinese Governments policy of silencing criticism of Communist China by removing them from Hong Kong and putting them into a secret trial system within China’s mainland where nearly everyone is found guilty. Its basic Freedom, the David and Goliath story but Goliath might awake and smash the Hong Kong freedom protestors at any time.

Meanwhile in the Socialist republic of New Zealand Madam Prime Minister follows China’s lead enforcing a disarmament campaign on the good citizens and banning the people from watching a video supposedly of the killing of 50 people in a mosque, however on close inspection it is a farce similar to a video game, showing toy firearms with flashing torches to imitate muzzle flash. So why ban something that is not what its properted to be? None of the supposed victims are recognisable all have conveniently covered their faces after lying down. When other news media film clips on the six o clock news show mass murders, which are more horrific they are not banned, no one is threatened with 14 years jail for watching the Bali Bombers. The governments are not banning other video games so what is in this video that it makes the removal of the freedom of exchange of information so necessary?

The real objective is to have servile people.
The media and politicians rush with swords drawn to protect the integrity of the Freedom of Speech when it’s a Federal raid on the ABC, when people lives and national secrets are at risk, but not one of them offers to say a word in the defence of protecting the freedom of Speech on the internet. No one wants to glorify in any way the creatures who attach un-armed defenceless people, but to take away the right of people to send it about and say “hey this video is nonsense”, shows that governments and media have other motives. Motives that they are not disclosing.
” We can say that the challenge to protect freedom, is now a challenge the Australian parliament has failed to meet. “Senator Eric Abetz
Motives that are similar to the sinister suppression of the Freedom of Speech in China, are not too dissimilar to the restrictions of freedoms in Australia and New Zealand, while Israel Folau explores legal avenues, the broader fight for freedom of religion and belief continues. Supposedly, the new federal parliament is now in session and the government is promising religious freedom legislation. I will only believe that their intentions are honourable when not just 18 C of the Racial Discrimination Act is removed, but when all of this Act is removed, plus the all inclusive State Anti Discrimination Acts are removed. These Acts do not just suppress the freedom of speech, they create public funded witch hunt inquisitions that use the power of the State to create legal precedents that nullify any safeguards that were put in these Acts to sell them to the dumbed down majority.
Just recently, a man described as the “UK’s Israel Folau” recently won a similar case, the British Justice system must not be as polluted as ours in Australia.

One man with integrity can change the world.
Christian student Felix Ngole was expelled from his social work course at Sheffield University for posting comments critical of homosexuality on Facebook.
After fighting a four-year legal battle, the UK Court of Appeal has ruled in favour of Ngole.
The decision, which overturned an earlier High Court ruling in the university’s favour, found that “the University adopted a position from the outset… which was untenable” and that the university “wrongly confused the expression of religious views with the notion of discrimination.”
The presiding judges pointed out that “The mere expression of views on theological grounds (e.g. that ‘homosexuality is a sin’) does not necessarily connote that the person expressing such views will discriminate on such grounds.”
Ngole’s comments were made in the course of a debate on Facebook over the jailing of US marriage registrar Kim Davis. Davis, you might recall, refused to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples in Kentucky and was jailed briefly for contempt of court in 2015.
Our Australian courts have always taken the opposite view ‘that if any person could be offended, no matter how slightly then there is breach of the Act which has to be prosectured.
Senator Eric Abetz describes this sort of discrimination correctly,
“In an exercise of Orwellian proportions, these sports stars were targeted for exclusion in the name of inclusion and discriminated against in the name of tolerance. You don’t have to agree with Izzy to agree with his right to express his religious views, or his wife’s right to back him.”The Senator then outlined why the Folau precedent is a threat to our freedom.
“Today it’s Izzy’s religious views and his wife’s loyal support. Yesterday it was the Professor Ridd’s scientific views. Tomorrow it might be somebody’s political view. The next might be someone’s environmental view. This is a fight for freedom of speech which impacts us all. The government must, and I am confident will, respond to the expressions of the quiet Australians on 18 May and ensure our freedoms, which were bought with the highest of prices, are not sacrificed and squandered on the altar of political correctness.”Any normal Australian who does not have the financial backing or profile of Andrew Bolt or Israel Folau stands no chance before government selected Tribunals, composed of one person. Their selection is not based on their knowledge but on their opinion and in most of the Tribunals the Rule of law and the Rules of evidence do not apply. One Tribunal member in my case bragged from the bench that he could take his opinion on evidence presented from what he read in the morning papers and ignore whatever I presented in my defence.
We do not have a Constitutional Monarchy, or a Constitutional democracy when we cannot comment or we are prevented from reading comments from others, without the freedom ot interchange information we are no better off than the Chinese people, or the Hong Kong people, the difference in the degrees of suppression we are in is just academic debate.
One Law For All.
We are either one nation with equal justice for all, or no justice for those without government support. Government now will support Muslins, homosexuals, and people with a darker skin colour, but won’t support Christians, firearm owners, and white skinned people. That is Discrimination in itself. If we had a correct justice system we are all at liberty to take any offence of Libel or Defamation to the civil courts, if the government wanted to do something right for once they could easily make the Justice system more affordable. Instead, they increase court fees and work to keep the legal profession exclusive. Without Justice we have nothing to fight for, we are just slaves and unfortunately very soon we are going to have to fight to exist in our troubled world.

This reminded me of someone, but when I remembered who it was, I felt that the Gorilla had been defamed.
“A Labor and Greens paradise would be a place where everybody has guaranteed employment, free comprehensive healthcare, free education, free food, free housing, free clothing, free utilities, and only law enforcement has guns.”
And believe it or not, such a place does indeed already exist. It’s called Prison.”
The War with China? Trade, or Missiles? Either could be terminal for Australia.
Australia is in a very vulnerable location with only a flea bite defence force that is more concerned with attracting more women and homosexuals than defending our continental shores.
Just these latest headlines should wake up our politicians.
“On Monday, the US State Department announced the $2.2 billion potential arms sale to Taiwan, which includes 108 Abrams tanks and 250 Stinger surface-to-air missiles.”
The Reaction was.
“Beijing lodged formal complaints through diplomatic channels expressing “strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition” and demanded the US “immediately cancel” the arms sale.”
“Taiwan stands in the frontline of China’s ambitious expansion and faces enormous threats and pressure from Beijing,” the Taiwanese foreign ministry said in a statement.
Lieutenant General Yang Hai-ming of the Taiwanese Army said.”Having the M1A2 to replace our older tanks will quickly and effectively boost our defence capability.” Meanwhile, Taiwan’s President Tsai Ing-wen arrived in New York City on Friday- for an official visit. Tsai dismissed Chinese criticism of both her visit and the arms deal. “We don’t need our neighbour to make irresponsible remarks,” she told reporters in New York, according to Taiwan’s official Central News Agency. She has rejected Chinese pressure to reunite Taiwan and China under the “one-country, two-systems” framework that governs Hong Kong. She said the people of Taiwan stand with the young people of Hong Kong who are fighting for democratic freedoms in ongoing protests.””Hong Kong’s experience under ‘one country, two systems’ has shown the world once and for all that authoritarianism and democracy cannot coexist,” Tsai said.
China Threats, Trade Sanctions.
China has threatened trade sanctions and “Urges the US to abide by the “one China principle” and to “not allow Tsai Ing-wen’s stopover, cease official exchanges with Taiwan, and refrain from providing any platform for separatist Taiwan independence forces”.So the 2020’s presents a real risk of a US-China military clash, seeing as Xi Jinping has said he will not tolerate Taiwanese independence, and they’re not willing to let go of the South China Sea— which is fundamentally at odds with what the US wants.”
Insecurity of Australia’s Oil Supply.
The Coal-To-Liquids Imperative For Australian Fuel Security. (click to read full report)
Stocks in terms of days of consumption cover
Petrol: 20 days
Aviation Turbine Fuel: 18 days
Diesel: 17 days

We are living on a hair-trigger in maintaining supply. There are localised shortages of diesel due to bad import batches, but we have immense dangers to our import supply. (Seems silly as we have a underground lake of Oil Shale in Queensland, but no refineries for it)
Either:
Australia continues as is with potential for enormous economic disruption from supply squeezes and a ballooning trade deficit.Or:
Australia installs Coal-To-Liquids capacity, insulates itself from supply disruptions and generates a large amount of income.

This is a Chinese coal to petrol plant, they have 20 new plants. Australia has lots of Coal.
At 2 barrels to the tonne, one tonne of coal produces 318 litres
The Mazda 3 has a fuel economy of 17.5 km to the litre.
Thus one tonne of coal will fuel a Mazda 3 for 5,580 km.
The Gulf between the Straits of Hormuz and the South China Sea is Growing.The Trump administration is planning to send US Navy ships to help escort oil tankers in the Gulf in order to protect them from possible Iranian aggression

Plus more trouble in the Middle East with the
US-Turkey standoff.The US has strongly urged Turkey to pull back from the deal, the first such move between a NATO member and Russia warning Ankara that it will face economic sanctions under the Countering America’s Adversaries Through Sanctions Act if it goes ahead with the purchase, reportedly costing more than $2 billion of Russia Cruise missiles.

The first shipment of the Russian S-400 missile system has arrived in Turkey, according to the Turkish defence Ministry, moving the NATO member closer to a new standoff with the United States.
“Once the system is completely ready, it will begin to be used in a way determined by the relevant authorities.””As far as we have been told, the systems will be operational by October 2019.”
Plus we have Trouble Brewing at Home.
The Australian Defence Force is closely tracking a high-tech Chinese spy ship as it makes its way towards Australia ahead of this month’s Talisman Sabre war games on the Queensland coast.
Australian military officials believe the laser attacks on the Navy helicopters came from fishing boats, but it has not yet been formally confirmed if the vessels were Chinese flagged. Beijing maintains a robust maritime militia in the South China Sea, composed of fishing vessels equipped to carry out missions just short of combat. “The Australian Government would view reports of military aircraft being targeted by lasers as an unwelcome and potentially dangerous development,” a Defence spokesperson told the ABC in July 2018.

These Chinese lads are not playing ‘Space invaders”, they have their finger on buttons with power.
The confrontations with the People’s Liberation Army are believed to have occurred as China was conducting its largest ever naval exercises in the hotly contested waters.
Defence sources have confirmed HMAS Anzac, HMAS Toowoomba and HMAS Success were challenged by the Chinese PLA Navy. The confrontations with the People’s Liberation Army are believed to have occurred as China was conducting its largest ever naval exercises in the hotly contested waters.
Hyper Velocity Rail Gun fitted to Chinese Navy Craft.

A Chinese navy warship armed with what looks like a mounted electro-magnetic rail gun has apparently set sail, possibly for testing in the open ocean. Chinese media outlets, such as the state-affiliated Global Times, revealed in March – nearly two months after the first pictures of what was dubbed the “Yangtze River Monster” showed up online – that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy is “making notable achievements on advanced weapons, including sea tests of electromagnetic railguns.”

The Type 072II Yuting-class tank landing ship Haiyangshan and its weapon were spotted along the Yangtze River at the Wuchang Shipyard in Wuhan earlier this year.
Global Times reporting in March that Zhang Xiao, an associate research fellow at the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Naval University of Engineering announced her research team was responsible for the “largest repeating power supply system in the world”.The sighting, which comes as China marks the 70th anniversary of the Chinese Navy in 2019, appears to pre-date US intelligence estimates that Chinese railguns would arrive by 2025. A US intelligence report found that China’s weapon would be able to strike 200 kilometres away with a projectile velocity of 2.5 kilometres per second (9,000kph — greater than Mach 7). While US developments remain classified, the US Office of Naval Research (ONR) gave BAE systems $48.3 million to test phase 2 of their railgun program in 2013. This phase will usher in the development of a multiple-shot railgun, alongside the development of a Hyper Velocity Projectile (HVP) that would see missiles fire at hypersonic speeds — technology that Russian President Vladimir Putin claimed Russia had successfully tested in December 2018. The US thus far has spent around $710.5 million on the railgun program, but experts fear it will languish as research weight pulls toward HVPs. “The Americans certainly aren’t going slow. They’ve realised they’ve lagged behind Russia and China and are racing to catch up.”
Yet while the future of our nation is perilous we have governments in Australia and New Zealand advocating disarmament, it brings to mind past follies.

Last time the world was in this much trouble only the lucky ones were given a rifle the un lucky ones had a broom handle.
Past Follies Taught the World Lessons that We Should Never Forget.
In 1777, William Knox, Under Secretary of State in the British Colonial Office, circulated a proposal entitled, “What is Fit to be Done with America?” Knox advocated. To keep them servile, the panacea of disarming all of the people and relying solely on a standing army:
“The Militia Laws should be repealed and none suffered to be re-enacted, the Arms of all the People should be taken away, & every piece of Ordnance removed into the King’s Stores, nor should any Foundry or manufactory of Arms, Gunpowder, or Warlike Stores, be ever suffered in America, nor should any Gunpowder, Lead, Arms or Ordnance be imported into it without License: they will have but little need of such things for the future, as the King’s Troops, Ships & Forts will be sufficient to protect them from any danger.”The British resorted to every possible tactic to disarm the Americans—entrapment, false promises of “safekeeping,” banning imports, direct seizure and finally shooting persons bearing arms.
In response to this repression a group of the freeholders led by James Otis and John Hancock met at Faneuil Hall and passed several resolutions, including the following:
“WHEREAS, by an Act of Parliament, of the first of King William and Queen Mary, it is declared, that the Subjects being Protestants, may have Arms for their Defence; it is the Opinion of this town, that the said Declaration is founded in Nature, Reason and sound Policy, and is well adapted for the necessary Defence of the Community. And Forasmuch, as by a good and wholesome Law of this Province, every listed Soldier and other Householder (except Troopers, who by law are otherwise to be provided) shall always be provided with a well fix’d Firelock, Musket, Accoutrements and Ammunition, as in said Law.”
The law that they were quoting from was not at the time the American Second Amendment to there Constitution as that was not established until 1787 and 1791, the law they resorted to was the British Bill of Rights of 1689. Where it lists twelve policies by which it was wrong to“endeavour to subvert the laws and liberties of this kingdom“, one of which was
“by causing Protestants to be disarmed at the same time when papists were both armed and employed contrary to law;”
“all which are utterly and directly contrary to the known laws and statutes and freedom of this realm.” and later it states in the seventh paragraph ”Subjects’ Arms.
“That the Subjects which are Protestants may have Arms for their Defence suitable to their Conditions and as allowed by Law.”
This and more was the reason for the 2nd Amendment to the USA Constitution and the reason why that law, the Bill of Rights of 1689 with those famous words unchanged is still engraved in the law books of every State of Australia and New Zealand. Its just suppressed by the same mentality of William Knox from 1777 and dictators in Hong Kong and the treacherous politicians here in Australia who want the good people left defenceless and servile.
Ron Owen
“whenever the Legislators endeavor to take away, and destroy the Property of the People, or to reduce them to Slavery under Arbitrary Power, they put themselves into a state of War with the People, who are thereupon absolved from any farther Obedience, and are left to the common Refuge, which God hath provided for all Men, against Force and Violence. Whensoever therefore the Legislative shall transgress this fundamental Rule of Society; and either by Ambition, Fear, Folly or Corruption, endeavor to grasp themselves, or put into the hands of any other an Absolute Power over the Lives, Liberties, and Estates of the People; By this breach of Trust they forfeit the Power, the People had put into their hands, for quite contrary ends, and it devolves to the People, who have a Right to resume their original Liberty.” John Locke
owenguns@spiderweb.com.au
The real objective is to have servile people.
One man with integrity can change the world.
This reminded me of someone, but when I remembered who it was, I felt that the Gorilla had been defamed.
This is a Chinese coal to petrol plant, they have 20 new plants. Australia has lots of Coal.
These Chinese lads are not playing ‘Space invaders”, they have their finger on buttons with power.
Last time the world was in this much trouble only the lucky ones were given a rifle the un lucky ones had a broom handle.
Labels:
Australia,
China,
family safety,
Firearms legislation,
freedoms,
Government corruption,
gun control,
guns,
home invasions,
human rights,
protection,
restrictions,
security,
war
Location:
Australia
Monday, August 27, 2018
Thoughts for The Week News By Ron Owen. Gun Control, Freedom, Human Rights in Australia.
Thoughts for The Week By Ron Owen.
Fraser Anning wrote my article this week, in his Ground Moving Historic Speech on 14th August. He said
“I believe that the unfettered ownership of private property and the right to own and use firearms, including for self-defence, are the God-given rights of free people everywhere. And I believe, as the American revolutionaries did, that government is usually the problem not the solution and that, in order for people to be, Free, the power of government needs to be constrained.” Senator Fraser Anning, Speech Tuesday, 14 August 2018 He said a lot more as well, his lacklustre contemporaries were horrified and have spent days hosing down the fire of truth that he unleashed, it caused a massive reaction, it was brilliant. Please read it for yourself and share it about. http://www.owenguns.com/historic-ground-breaking-speech-in-commonwealth-parliament
Senator Fraser Anning
Some Information Really Matters, and Most is only Smoke And Mirrors.
What does not matter, is that we have had Six Prime Ministers in Ten years, and all the media tripe about Prime Ministers Changing Wally One, for Wally Two.
As there is no provision, or requirement for a PM within our Commonwealth Constitution anyway, so we would be better off without one and then hopefully the parties would not control the representatives. Those who pay their wages, their electorates might have a chance of being represented by someone who is not under party control. In fact there is no requirement or provision for political parties and in fact Sub Section (or placitum) 45, (the next provision along from the famous Sub Section 44) specifically prohibits the giving of honorariums, (gift of pre-selection) to buy their votes in Parliament.
What does not matter, is that we have had Six Prime Ministers in Ten years, and all the media tripe about Prime Ministers Changing Wally One, for Wally Two.
As there is no provision, or requirement for a PM within our Commonwealth Constitution anyway, so we would be better off without one and then hopefully the parties would not control the representatives. Those who pay their wages, their electorates might have a chance of being represented by someone who is not under party control. In fact there is no requirement or provision for political parties and in fact Sub Section (or placitum) 45, (the next provision along from the famous Sub Section 44) specifically prohibits the giving of honorariums, (gift of pre-selection) to buy their votes in Parliament.
“Vacancy on happening of disqualification.
45. If a senator or member of the House of Representatives–
(I.) Becomes subject to any of the disabilities mentioned in the last
preceding section: or
(iii.) Directly or indirectly takes or agrees to take any fee or honorarium
for services rendered to the Commonwealth, or for services rendered in the
Parliament to any person or State: his place shall thereupon become vacant”.
The party system causes a ‘buy and sell’ market of votes in exchange
for campaign funds, so they represent the party and not their electorates.
Every party politician at pre-selection by his or her party agrees to take an honorarium, (The honour benefit) party campaign assistance, for services rendered in Parliament, giving their allegiance to vote on party lines. As an example that is why Fraser Anning resigned from One Nation and mentions those reasons in his speech, that exposure is why Pauline Hansen railed his speech without referring to that point.
Every party politician at pre-selection by his or her party agrees to take an honorarium, (The honour benefit) party campaign assistance, for services rendered in Parliament, giving their allegiance to vote on party lines. As an example that is why Fraser Anning resigned from One Nation and mentions those reasons in his speech, that exposure is why Pauline Hansen railed his speech without referring to that point.
“If an individual could be induced to agree and state to others
something they knew to be utterly false such as black being white, then the
party had achieved total moral and ethical surrender in the subject.” Fraser
Anning.
So all that bull, is just entertainment for the TV. Politicians form
themselves into power groups to dominate and control power, it entertains the
masses and take the peoples minds away from the real information that important
to their existence.
The Facts That Matter.
Such As:-
539,000 immigrants in 2016/2017.
539,000 immigrants in 2016/2017.
1. More than half-a-million immigrants moved to Australia in the
last year – setting a new record. New figures from the Australian Bureau of
Statistics showed 539,000 immigrants moved to Australia in the 2016-17
financial year, an all-time high. We still do not have the figures for 2017-18,
but as the policy has not changed the figure would be very similar. This is
catastrophic, besides the stress on our services, such as health, transport,
and housing, already 50% of every dollar we workers pay goes on to welfare.
Besides the barefaced problems of internal security of our population they seem
intent on sending us further and further down the bankruptcy pit.
Some might have heard this saying
2. “The problems we face today exist because the people who work
for a living are outnumbered by those who only VOTE for a living!”
The Liberal/ National politicians encourage this mass immigration,
they say to boost the economy, as they believe that this extra million people
(In two years) looking for work will keep the wagers down by providing more
competition. They are not smart enough to realise that the majority of those
that they choose to import will never look for a job anyway. They will never
come off the welfare payments.
Labour politicians encourage this mass immigration, as they believe
that they are the Welfare givers, so naturally all welfare receivers will vote
for more welfare money.http://expressdigest.com/a-record-539000-immigrants-moved-to-australia-with-the-net-pace-of-262000-the-highest-in-13-years/
This is not just self interest, corruption on a grand scale, it is plain treason, they are betraying our country.
This is not just self interest, corruption on a grand scale, it is plain treason, they are betraying our country.
3. Twenty thee years ago in 1995 two articles appeared in the
politically IN correct magazine, (that I had something to do with) in Lock
Stock & Barrel,
“The Vanishing White Races” Edition 20 Lock Stock & Barrel 1995
highlighted that the birthrate of Australians and the western world was in
steep decline and the birth rate of north African migrants from Islamic
countries and migrants from the Middle East from Islamic countries was huge.
This article did not highlight the whole problem, which magnifies the situation
to an higher degree, the baby factory approach of, one male to four female
wives and the female children being married as young as nine years old to
extend the fertility years of the female for a longer period. Replacement level
fertility is the number of babies a female would need to have over her
reproductive life to replace both herself and her partner. Given the current
mortality rates for women aged up to 49 years in Australia, replacement
fertility is estimated to be 2.1 babies per woman. In Australia during the late
1970s, the total fertility rate began to decline and since 1976, the total
fertility rate for Australia has been below this replacement level. Even if
female mortality declined to zero for women until the end of their reproductive
lives, the replacement level would still be 2.05 (1.05 male and 1.0 female
babies) much higher than the total fertility rate of 1.73 babies per woman for
2001. Unless we have a huge change the European/western people of Australia are
on a road to extinction.
Of those 539,000 people 2016/2017 and the 500,000 plus of 2017/2018
most will be from Northern Africa and the Middle East where in some countries
the fertility rate is almost 7 children per woman, Niger is the country with
the highest fertility rate in the world followed by Mali. Statistics show that
the fertility rate per woman in low income countries is twice as high as the
global average. As a result, 9 out of the top 10 countries with the highest
fertility rates are in Africa.
“It’s too important for that. Instead, we need a plebiscite to allow
the Australian people to decide whether they want wholesale non-English
speaking immigrants from the Third World and, in particular, whether they want
any Muslims or whether they want to return to the predominantly European
immigration policy of the pre-Whitlam consensus.” Fraser Anninng.
4. Combine that fact with another article from Lock Stock &
Barrel 1995 which was a book review “Wrath of Allah“, by Robert Burns, Edition
21 of Lock Stock & Barrel.1995.
“For Whom My Wrath doth fall he perishes outright“, Qur’an 20-81,
“For Whom My Wrath doth fall he perishes outright“, Qur’an 20-81,
Quote, “The Muslim Brotherhood aims to Islamise the world and seeks
supremacy in all Muslim States. “Every Stratagem and deceit is justifiable if
they are for the greater good of Allah.” Mr Burns exposes the expansionist
intentions that are prevalent in the philosophy of Islam.”
https://view.publitas.com/p222-13055/publitas-lock-stock-and-barrel-edition-21/page/32-33
https://view.publitas.com/p222-13055/publitas-lock-stock-and-barrel-edition-21/page/32-33
It would be hard to find anyone over the age of 15 years that
is NOT aware that the Islamic faith has a Jihad against all the
people of Western/European society. We have a Global Jihad, we are involved in
a total war, with out the Geneva Conventions our women and children civilians
are all considered targets.
Australiastan is a Target.
http://www.islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/anti-extremism/56-the-globalization-of-jihad-from-islamist-resistance-to-war-against-the-west.html?start=5
Quote “Therefore I have a fear that, eventually, we will see Islamist violence spread not only to the cities of Europe, but also here at home. Make no mistake: The aim of the jihadists is to extend their power not only through Afghanistan, Kazakhstan and Pakistan, but also through “Francistan,” “Londistan,” “Italistan,” “Switzeristan,” “Hollandistan” and even “Americastan.” That is the globalization of jihad.” Even Australiastan.
http://www.islamicsupremecouncil.org/understanding-islam/anti-extremism/56-the-globalization-of-jihad-from-islamist-resistance-to-war-against-the-west.html?start=5
Quote “Therefore I have a fear that, eventually, we will see Islamist violence spread not only to the cities of Europe, but also here at home. Make no mistake: The aim of the jihadists is to extend their power not only through Afghanistan, Kazakhstan and Pakistan, but also through “Francistan,” “Londistan,” “Italistan,” “Switzeristan,” “Hollandistan” and even “Americastan.” That is the globalization of jihad.” Even Australiastan.
“We have ISIS-sympathising Muslims trying to go overseas to fight for
ISIS and, while all Muslims are not terrorists, certainly all terrorists these
days are Muslims.Fraser Anning.
5. In all past wars of the 20th Century WW2 WW1, all enemy
nationals were placed in internment camps, Japanese, German, Italian and even
Jews from Germany. All were locked up, mainly because our of sensible leader of
the time did not want a fifth column of internal resistance. They did not want
to fight a war within the country while Australia was fighting for its
existence. Imagine the response in the 1940s if someone proposed that we import
a million Japanese migrants, over two years, they would be hanged drawn and
quartered given a traitors death. Yet this is what our major parties have been
orchestrating for thirty years and the crescendo, the impact is impending doom,
the rubber is due to hit the road soon. We would need a modern miracle to
divert it.
“WAR WILL FIND US,WHETHER WE ARE READY OR NOT“. Winston S.
Churchill.
“Historically, however, the one immigrant group here and in other
Western nations that has consistently shown itself to be the least able to
assimilate and integrate is Muslims. “”The first terrorist act on Australian
soil was in 1915, when two Muslim immigrants opened fire on a picnic train of
innocent women and children in Broken Hill — and Muslim immigrants have been a
problem ever since. ” Fraser Anning.
The Ice Cream Cart that carried the Muslims rifles.
6. The party politicians are getting jittery and scared so
that when Senator Fraser Anning poured a bucket load of information down upon
them in his maiden speech their re-action was furious, venomous in fact they
pulled every emotional stunt in the book of political doublespeak to cat call
and degrade the personality of Fraser Anning. They could not afford to give
breath to the facts and points that he included in his speech so had to invent
and accuse him of what he had not said.
“I also have fiscal objectives. I’d like to see a drastic cut in
government spending and borrowing, but, with around 50 per cent of the budget
now consumed by welfare, no spending reform is possible without welfare reform.””and
ban all immigrants receiving welfare for the first five years after they
arrive.” Fraser Anning.
Intolerance of Other Opinions is Ignorance.
Malcolm Turnbull led the ‘Hate Speech” band wagon but should have read Fraser Anning speech and not gone off half cocked, or maybe he had read it, and decided to invent his own version instead. He and the other Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum traitors had to vilify Fraser Anning either way, as they had to decry its truth. Calling Fraser Anning a “Fruit loop on the crossbenches,” ‘other distraction’, “tiny minded”, “minority voices”, “unrepresentative swill”, “screaming minorities”. Turnbull, demonstrates his ignorance by reiterating the old whipping post ‘The White Australia Policy’. There was never any specific policy titled as such, but the term was invented by the media and politicians to later to encapsulate the Immigrations Acts that they wanted to remove, and the Jingo ‘White Australia Policy’ sounded better for them, it meant nothing to them that those Acts of Parliament had been introduced to protect Australian workers from competition from slave labourers, who were being transported from Asia and the Pacific Islands to work for existence only wages. They were accepted by the Federal Parliament, not for racial reasons, but the same reasons as specified by Senator Anning in his maiden speech, for economic and humanitarian reasons. To stop the exploitation of the Australian working taxpayers, by employers and bankers who want to exploit cheap labour. If Malcolm Turnbull had read Fraser Anning speech he would have noticed that he does not mention the White Australia Policy at all. Not Once. http://www.owenguns.com/historic-ground-breaking-speech-in-commonwealth-parliament
Malcolm Turnbull led the ‘Hate Speech” band wagon but should have read Fraser Anning speech and not gone off half cocked, or maybe he had read it, and decided to invent his own version instead. He and the other Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum traitors had to vilify Fraser Anning either way, as they had to decry its truth. Calling Fraser Anning a “Fruit loop on the crossbenches,” ‘other distraction’, “tiny minded”, “minority voices”, “unrepresentative swill”, “screaming minorities”. Turnbull, demonstrates his ignorance by reiterating the old whipping post ‘The White Australia Policy’. There was never any specific policy titled as such, but the term was invented by the media and politicians to later to encapsulate the Immigrations Acts that they wanted to remove, and the Jingo ‘White Australia Policy’ sounded better for them, it meant nothing to them that those Acts of Parliament had been introduced to protect Australian workers from competition from slave labourers, who were being transported from Asia and the Pacific Islands to work for existence only wages. They were accepted by the Federal Parliament, not for racial reasons, but the same reasons as specified by Senator Anning in his maiden speech, for economic and humanitarian reasons. To stop the exploitation of the Australian working taxpayers, by employers and bankers who want to exploit cheap labour. If Malcolm Turnbull had read Fraser Anning speech he would have noticed that he does not mention the White Australia Policy at all. Not Once. http://www.owenguns.com/historic-ground-breaking-speech-in-commonwealth-parliament
Malcolm Turnbull with his pandemonium of parrots , vilifies Senator
Anning for using the words, “Final Solution” in his speech, as this is another
Jingoistic name manufactured by the media and Hollywood to whip up emotion and
hate, and I’m not defending those who were found guilty of genocide at
Nuernberg at all, but the these two words have been captured by the media and
misused time and time again, as if they are the only ones allowed to use those
words “Final Solution”, Fraser Annings detractors used it many times, but
condemned the Senator for his word use. They could not criticise him for the
facts so had to resort to using his choice of words.
The pandemonium of parrots in parliament ignored the fact that
Hitler, nor anyone else in Germany during the war, used the words, “Final
Solution”, in reference to the genocide of the Jewish people in German occupied
Europe. The nearest to it was, “Endlösung der Judenfrage” translated to mean
“The resolution of the Jewish Question” These words were used on 31 July 1941,
by Reichsmarschall Hermann Göring when he wrote to Reinhard Heydrich (Himmler’s
deputy and chief of the RSHA), instructing Heydrich, but cannot deny any else
from using those two words, ‘Solution and Final’. How else can we express the
need for any final solution?
Punish An Entire Group, Illogical??
Malcolm Turnbull’s said “There is neither logic nor natural law which gives validity to punishing an entire group because a small section of its number MIGHT harbour ill intentions.”
Sounds intelligent, but it’s a lie and its false, Fraser Anning never remotely suggests that a group is punished for the crimes of individuals. Fraser points out as a fact that we Australians have a right to chose, who we allow to share our country with and suggests a national referendum to allow that choice to me made. We all can see the hypocrisy in Turnbulls statement as 2 million plus law abiding licenced firearm owners in Australia. (Page 132 ACIC Annual Report https://acic.govcms.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1491/f/acic_2016-17_annual_report.pdf?v=1508387578)
are punished continually for the actions of one, maybe two un licenced criminals that perpetrated the Port Arthur massacre. How convenient for our hypocritical, so called superior’s, to forget that fact.
“If you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?”. – (Act III, scene I).” W. Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, quotes from that famous Jewish Merchant, but these words applies to all of us and those that did read the speech, all who do read it will know they are being ‘wronged’ and will seek to ‘ revenge’ not in the ‘pound of flesh’, that is sort by Malcolm Turnbull from the chest of Senator Fraser Anning, but where it all counts in the ballot boxes of the Lab/Lib coalition.
Malcolm Turnbull’s said “There is neither logic nor natural law which gives validity to punishing an entire group because a small section of its number MIGHT harbour ill intentions.”
Sounds intelligent, but it’s a lie and its false, Fraser Anning never remotely suggests that a group is punished for the crimes of individuals. Fraser points out as a fact that we Australians have a right to chose, who we allow to share our country with and suggests a national referendum to allow that choice to me made. We all can see the hypocrisy in Turnbulls statement as 2 million plus law abiding licenced firearm owners in Australia. (Page 132 ACIC Annual Report https://acic.govcms.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1491/f/acic_2016-17_annual_report.pdf?v=1508387578)
are punished continually for the actions of one, maybe two un licenced criminals that perpetrated the Port Arthur massacre. How convenient for our hypocritical, so called superior’s, to forget that fact.
“If you prick us, do we not bleed? if you tickle us, do we not laugh? if you poison us, do we not die? and if you wrong us, shall we not revenge?”. – (Act III, scene I).” W. Shakespeare, The Merchant of Venice, quotes from that famous Jewish Merchant, but these words applies to all of us and those that did read the speech, all who do read it will know they are being ‘wronged’ and will seek to ‘ revenge’ not in the ‘pound of flesh’, that is sort by Malcolm Turnbull from the chest of Senator Fraser Anning, but where it all counts in the ballot boxes of the Lab/Lib coalition.
Lets move the Cotton Wool from our Eyes.
See how that all took your mind off the real facts, the real scary look into the future of our children, do we want to see them in a fight to the death, a fight for their existence, or submission to a medieval philosophy of hate and slavery of women as their only alternative. If we change our immigration policy today, we might have a chance of overcoming, but tomorrow will be too late.
THE FASCISTS OF THE FUTURE WILL CALL THEMSELVES ANTI FASCISTS” Winston S. Churchill.
See how that all took your mind off the real facts, the real scary look into the future of our children, do we want to see them in a fight to the death, a fight for their existence, or submission to a medieval philosophy of hate and slavery of women as their only alternative. If we change our immigration policy today, we might have a chance of overcoming, but tomorrow will be too late.
THE FASCISTS OF THE FUTURE WILL CALL THEMSELVES ANTI FASCISTS” Winston S. Churchill.
“Now, on the brink of irreversible change, it is time for us to
decide whether we as a people will rise up against this, hold fast to the
crimson threads of kinship that define and unite us and strive once more for
the light on the hill or concede the field to enemies of Western civilization
and see all that we were, and all that we might yet have become, fall away to
ruin.” Fraser Anning
This Newsletter is published by Owen Guns 24
McMahon Road, Gympie Ph: 07 5482 5070.
Labels:
Australia,
Corporatism,
corruption,
firearms restrictions,
freedoms,
government,
gun control,
human rights,
laws,
legislation,
Newsletter,
Owen guns,
Ron Owen,
self defence
Location:
Australia
Friday, December 8, 2017
The Government is Trying to Gag GetUp & its Petitions!!!
Fight for our
independence
The Turnbull Government just introduced a "GetUp clause"
specifically designed to curb our movement's power. We need hundreds more
people joining the GetUp Crew to protect our independent movement.
Eric Abetz and his hard right cronies know they're about to
fail for the third time to force Getup members to become an
"associated entity" of the ALP and the Greens.
Even worse, they're trying to legislate a gag order on charities fighting to protect the rights of children, people who are homeless and our environment – while letting multinational corporations cut politicians blank cheques.
This is more than an attack on civil society – it's a sinister abuse of government power to silence those who speak out against it.
We need to defend the right of everyday people to participate in democracy and civil society. And that means fighting back with everything we've got. Can you join the Getup Crew ?
Even worse, they're trying to legislate a gag order on charities fighting to protect the rights of children, people who are homeless and our environment – while letting multinational corporations cut politicians blank cheques.
This is more than an attack on civil society – it's a sinister abuse of government power to silence those who speak out against it.
We need to defend the right of everyday people to participate in democracy and civil society. And that means fighting back with everything we've got. Can you join the Getup Crew ?
More Information Here. https://www.getup.org.au/campaigns/democracy/getup-is-under-attack/fight-for-our-independence?t=kJ1bzspLb
Labels:
Big Government,
Corporatism,
corruption,
freedoms,
government,
human rights
Location:
Australia
Friday, October 13, 2017
More on Gun Control & the Recent Firearms Amnesty.
We are seeing the use of terms such as "Illegal", "Arsenals" "guns off the streets" & other sensationalising terms. So who made these guns illegal in the first place? Our government. Some guns being handed in now date back to WW2. All these thousands of "Illegal Guns" have supposedly been "on our streets" since WW2 & we only had one mass shooting which was in Tasmania!!! Don't you think this sounds a little odd?
Now we are hearing about private "arsenals", not collections or ownership but arsenals. Well if these private "arsenals" are such a risk, considered so dangerous, how come we have not had mass shootings like they have had in America? The confiscation of law abiding gun owner's guns after the Port Arthur shooting did nothing to stop crime, because these guns BELONGED to law abiding gun owners. But now you might as well put a poster out front of every Australian home declaring "This House Not Protected With Firearms"!!! Now we are seeing regular home invasions, AND you can face charges if you try to defend yourself or your family. Australian women are attacked & assaulted every 2 minutes in Australia & all the government did was to cut funding to women's help centers!!!
Surely we should have the right to defend ourselves & our families from harm? Yet in Australia it is illegal to purchase or carry ANYTHING for use in self defence, no guns, no pepper sprays, no tasers, not even marking paint!
Farmers used to be able to carry hand guns whilst they went about their daily work. Some carried snake guns which were cut down .410 shotguns for protection against snakes. Not any more. These were law abiding people who were suddenly classed as criminals because the government deemed it so! Shotguns, the farmer's stock in trade along with the little .22 rimfire rifle is now under attack by the Greens & the anti-gun lobby. Semi-auto .22s have already been banned, & now they want our shotguns as well!!!
As I see it it is no good us complaining & protesting against more gun control & the loss of our human rights. We need to put an end to this. Our government is supposed to be looking after our well being, that means ALL OF US. Not just big companies, not just the wealthy, but ALL OF US. This is no longer happening. Whether it be the environment, our safety, our freedoms, our human rights, our well being, or the right to choose our own lifestyle, the right to defend ourselves, our families & our homes. All that is gone now.
I think Australians need to ask themselves where this is all going, is there no end to the government seemingly uncaring attitude. If we have lost the right to defend ourselves & our families without risk of prosecution, then what rights do we have left that matters? People are dieing out there! Do you think that this can't happen to you? If the preservation of our freedom & the right to defend ourselves is NOT the most important thing in our lives, what is?
https://www.centraltelegraph.com.au/news/almost-3000-queensland-guns-be-destroyed/3236243/
Labels:
amnesty,
assaults,
attacks,
Australia,
confiscation,
Firearms legislation,
freedoms,
gun control,
home invasions,
human rights,
Police,
Port Arthur,
preppers,
prepping,
self defence,
stabbings,
survival,
theft
Location:
Australia
Thursday, July 27, 2017
Thief storms over Melbourne servo counter in armed robbery. Australian Government's Anti Self defence Laws Leaves Citizens Defenseless!
Will the majority of Australians ever complain about being left defenseless by the Government's anti self defence laws?
Labels:
assault,
bashings,
car jackings,
defenseless,
freedoms,
government,
home invasions,
human rights,
muggings,
murder,
non lethal,
pepper spray,
rape,
robbery,
sexual assault,
tasers,
theft,
unarmed
Location:
Australia
Tuesday, July 25, 2017
Economic Security Equals Personal Security. F.O.A.A.
Not in Australia it wouldn't, "she'll be right mate" !!!!!!!
Economic Security Equals Personal Security.
WHY DO WE HAVE STARVATION IN A LAND OF PLENTY?
As this site is concerned with our Freedoms, our Rights and our
Security, its time to take a broader brush and give a lot of thought to our
Economic Security.
Why do we have an economic system that turns the government into an
end, instead of a means, and the individual into a means instead of an end?
What has happened to the Constitutional demand that all institutions
exist to serve the individual, that the State exists to serve its citizens? Now
it appears that the only reason for individuals to exist, is to serve the
State.
If it moves, tax it. If it keeps moving, regulate it. If it stops
moving, subsidize it. The problem is not that people are taxed too little, the
problem is that government spends too much. —Ronald Reagan.
Real economic security would mean that individuals in society must
have sufficient purchasing power to provide effective demand in order to
consume what they produce. Absolute economic security resides in the possession
of a sufficient income at all times to buy the goods and services without which
their would be no demand, no production and no payments of wages.
We have next to ask, where do wages, and dividends come from? All
incomes as purchasing power are distributed into the hands of consumers through
the operations of productive industry. All real purchasing power arises in
production. It takes the form of wages, salaries and dividends paid directly to
individuals engaged in industry or indirectly from them, through taxation, to
those bureaucrats and beneficiaries who spend the money we produce. With loans
they are spending future income from production. There is no other form of
purchasing power in the Western World system of economics.
Why is there never enough purchasing power in our national economy?
Government doesn’t produce, it only consumes and produces a large
negative effect. Here are some of the reasons we have poverty amongst the
plenty.
In 2015-16 it took $405.4 billion in taxation, but its total expenses
for 2015-16 were $434.5 billion, so the balance was a further debt of 29.1
billion. Just paying the interest on that is taking spending’s from our future
earnings, or the earnings of our children.
In 2012 Australian Households spent a total of $642 billion on
general living costs but in the same year only earned $521.3 billion in
wages and income. So again the balance goes in a $120.7 Billion dollar debt
which has to be paid from our future earning.
The manufacturing industry in Australia has declined from 30% of GDP
in the 1960s to 12% of GDP in 2007. Yet in 2012 we still donated $7.7 billion
in Foreign Aid.
From the figures above we can understand that although Australians
earn over a Trillion dollars annually their government masters, remove over
$400 billion in taxation which is used to pay their governments interest on its
debts. (According to a report released in October 2013, the nation’s poverty
rate increased from 10.2 per cent to 11.8 per cent, from 2000/01 to 2013.)
The above general formula is endemic to most countries in the Western
World, the governments are run in debt to the banks and so to are 90% of there
populations.
There is no single cause operating in the western world today which
is of such importance and is so fraught with the possibility of world disaster,
as is the disparity between purchasing power and prices. The longer it
continues, unchecked the more certain and with more speed approaches
either Depression, or War, or Both.
What causes that disparity, that lack of spending power? It is simply
that when any item is being produced only a part of its final selling price is
the wages and income factor. Say with a packet of .22 ammunition, its production
can be split into
A. The cost of lead, powder and brass,
B. The cost of wages and dividends,
C. Taxation and Interest.
Only the earnings, wages and dividends goes into the economy to allow
income to be spent on purchasing what they produce.
Governments Sell Tomorrow, To Pay For Today.
Taxation and Interest remove money from the economy, so instead of
economic security you have economic slavery. All Government spending is
borrowed from the four major banks, and all of the Taxation (Government Revenue)
goes to pay the Bank interest on the Government Debt. The Governments Principle
Debt just increases annually.
Look at your electricity bill only a part of your payment will go
back into the economy in wages, the rest will be negatived by government
tariffs and interest. Though these costs, representing profits, interest and
depreciation, are all loaded into prices, the money to liquidate them is not
distributed to the public neither as wages, salaries, nor dividends. So to
afford them the public have to borrow from the banks.
Therefore, prices are always greater than the money available to buy
them. In other words, there is always a disparity between the flow in the
generation of purchasing power and the generation of prices in any one
productive period. As can be seen, this is due to accounting all costs into
prices without making provision for liquidating all of them.
This is the flaw in the finance-economic system, and is the main
cause of all the economic troubles in the world. It is directly traceable to
the use of debt for money and to the policies and practices of the monopoly of
credit. Under the present financial system, there is no sound means of bridging
the gap between purchasing power and prices.
Now I am not suggesting that the current position of some of the
people doing well and the majority struggling in debts should be swapped for
socialism.
Margaret Thatcher, Prime Minister of Great Britain from 1979 to 1990,
summed up socialism nicely: “The problem with socialism is that you eventually
run out of other people’s money.”
Socialism takes income away from productive people and gives it to
non-productive people. When a percentage of your hard-earned money is
confiscated, you have fewer choices and a lower standard of living. If a larger
amount of money is confiscated in taxation, you’re a slave and your only reason
for continuing to work is to lessen the depth of the debt.
Socialism is simply a camouflaged Communism.
The once-mighty USSR fell apart in 1989 due to iron-fisted
socialistic policies that destroyed the economy while taking away virtually ALL
freedoms from its citizens.
People who have recently visited Cuba report that it’s like time has
stopped in 1959 when Castro and communism took over. Literally all the cars on
the road were manufactured in, or before, 1959. Cuba today still looks like
1955. Unemployment is 48 percent and 80 percent of those who have jobs work for
the government, making Cuba’s economy a disaster.
Venezuela is a bigger disaster, their hospitals are germ-infested
trash dumps and they’re currently rioting over food. Venezuela’s hospitals are
horrible. In less than 20 years they’ve gone from the most prosperous South
American nation to the poorest, all because it elected a socialistic government
that did away with good economic policies.
North and South Korea are perfect examples of the difference between
a free economy and communism (slavery). In communist North Korea, 2.5 million
people starve each year. In capitalistic South Korea, her GDP is the 10th
largest in the world.
The application of science and technology to production now enables
mankind to ensure a reasonable sufficiency of material needs to all, without
continuing economic servitude. But the existing financial system is
fundamentally flawed. It is endangering the planet through ruthless
exploitation of its limited resources in pursuit of financial profit and its
wish for ever greater power over the people.
Industry, to be successful, must get back from the public in the
prices of its goods more than it pays out to suppliers of materials and labour
involved in their manufacture. Otherwise, it could not make a profit. Then the
GST factor takes a great slice out of the available spending power.
As industry by necessity distributes all incomes as purchasing power,
where does industry, in its turn, get the money for its infrastructure? A brief
examination will show that industry is financed from savings, or from loans or
overdrafts from the banking system.
Let us follow logically the results flowing from the disparity in
which the producers, wage earners, farmers can never find the money or means of
exchange to purchase the goods that they produce and need.
It must be evident at the outset, that in every cycle of production a
proportion of the goods must remain unsold. As further cycles are completed,
the unsold portions must pile up till it is useless and dangerous to produce
more for the time being, so banks restrict credit, production slows down, and
men are laid off.
When workers are laid off, wages cease, purchasing power further
diminishes, less goods are sold, credit is further restricted or called in and
cancelled. There is a rush to sell below cost and bankruptcies occur.
Standards of living now fall rapidly; there is further unemployment;
dole conditions and acute depression appear; governments start relief works,
and the banks readily lend to governments the credit they refuse to industry.
Debt and taxation grow apace. As the spending power decreases much of the
surplus goods remains unsold, and we have starvation and poverty in the midst
of abundance. Goods are wantonly destroyed by oversized banana, oversized pigs
etc. and production is forcibly restricted. With mass unemployment everywhere,
we are told to work harder, save more, and spend less. Saving and spending less
is also a negative.
Parallel with these manifestations is the struggle to find markets
abroad for the goods that cannot be sold at home. As all nations are doing the
same thing, and are in the same economic plight from the same cause, this leads
to commercial hostility, international friction, and finally and inevitably,
to WAR.
Government is not a solution to our problems, government IS the
problem…
Government does not solve problems, it is the root source of the main problem. Government gives the nations right to create credit, to the four main‘Banks of Issue’ and allows them to create it and charge us all for the privilege to borrow it from them.
Government does not solve problems, it is the root source of the main problem. Government gives the nations right to create credit, to the four main‘Banks of Issue’ and allows them to create it and charge us all for the privilege to borrow it from them.
As a simile imagine that all the oil and gas beneath the land mass of
Australia, which is really the public credit, or wealth of Australia owned in
title by the Commonwealth Government on behalf of all its citizens, was given
away to a private company at no charge, and then every time the government, or
the people wanted some oil and gas the private company lent it to them and then
charged and ever increasing interest rate, plus demanding the full return of
the oil and gas.
Current governments have never dealt with the root problem, the
monopoly of credit creation by the international banking system, they take the
donations from banks into their party election funds and considers themselves
lucky. The first government that ever succeeds to handle this problem might
never be given an election donation by a Bank but would be elected forever by
the people.
The Black Heart of the Problem.
The banks only lend money/credit as a repayable interest-bearing
debt, with number one priority over the assets of the borrower, so it is clear
that the banks entirely control production in this way. In the national economy
of ever increasing disparity between prices and spending power, as loans are
paid back and the credit crossed off, and as the interest is paid the spending
power within the community decreases, and only increases when the Banks create
and issue more debt. The Banks choses who wins and who goes without, who
succeeds and who fails.
We have already seen that the money flowing through industry is the
only source of purchasing power, so it is also clear that the banks, in
controlling production, automatically control consumption as well.
That is to say, the whole economic system is dominated by the banks
and, consequently, they dominate the lives and destinies of the people, and
dictate the policies of governments. History proves this conclusively.
It must be remembered that the banks have discretionary powers to
call in loans and overdrafts even before the goods they brought into existence
have been sold, and they sometimes exercise this power with disastrous effects
on the community. Now let us go still another step further and ask where do the
banks get the money they lend to industry, and which gives them control of the
community.
The answer is again quite simple:
THEY CREATE IT.
In the terse phrase of the English economist, Sir Ralph George Hawtrey, “They create the means of payment out of nothing.” The money so created is called bank credit, but it really is the public credit, like the oil and gas under our feet, it belongs to all of us.
THEY CREATE IT.
In the terse phrase of the English economist, Sir Ralph George Hawtrey, “They create the means of payment out of nothing.” The money so created is called bank credit, but it really is the public credit, like the oil and gas under our feet, it belongs to all of us.
Banks do not lend the money deposited with them by their clients as
most people suppose. Every bank loan or overdraft is an absolute creation of
new credit and this credit functions as money.
When cheques are drawn against this credit, they come back into the
banking system and form deposits. Practically all deposits are created in this
way. Instead of deposits being used by the banks to create loans, as is generally
believed, the loans are book figures, (or electronic) and real money or credit
has to be deposited to write the loan off the books.
The actual creation of bank credit is an almost costless operation as
it consists merely of written entries in bank ledgers or computers, and made
effective by written entries in cheque books, or credit cards. Banking, is
mostly bookkeeping. Finance is mostly accountancy, and money is mostly figures.
Though bank credit is supposed to be issued against the security of
the borrower, it is really issued against the productive capacity and the real
or “social” credit created by the communities wealth as a whole. The banks,
however, treat this community credit as though they are the sole owners, and
are thus in the unique position of being able to lend something they do not
own, and of being well paid for it.
As banks have the sole privilege of creating and issuing money in
this way, they thus constitute a monopoly of credit that functions as money
which keeps the whole community, to whom the credit rightly belongs, in
subjection through debt. This monopoly of credit or money creation is the
greatest power ever vested in any institution in the history of the world.
The economy should exist to provide people, as efficiently as
possible, with the goods and services that they need to survive and flourish.
That is, production exists for the sake of consumption, not for the sake of
money-making, employment, satisfying the creative impulse, or ‘moral’
discipline (considered as ends in themselves). It most certainly does not exist
for the sake of centralizing wealth and power in the hands of a Banking
oligarchic elite.
Ron Owen
Ron Owen
The Way Out, and the way to Freedom will be in next months bulletin.
Labels:
ammunition,
banks,
corruption,
equipment,
freedoms,
government,
human rights,
Illegal,
Interest,
money,
preppers,
prepping,
profits,
purchasing,
scam,
security,
stealing,
supplies,
survival
Location:
Australia
Tuesday, June 20, 2017
Thoughts For The Week By Ron Owen.
Thoughts For The Week.
“Nothing that is achieved from human progress is achieved with
unanimous consent, and those that are enlightened before the others are
condemned to pursue that light, in spite of others.” Christopher Columbus
My first thought is to express my sympathy for the bereaved and
wounded from the Islamic attacks on the civilians of Manchester, (my home town)
and London. I have left these thoughts for some time as I did not want to seem
to be competing with the Anti Gun Ghouls who leap on the mass media band wagon
after every massacre and repeatedly tear through the blood and entrails with
bared teeth trying to get every ounce of gun banning trumpery regurgitated.
They Work Like Two Hungry Wolves Tearing A Milking Cow Apart One At
Each End.
Why do our politicians cry peace, when we all know our enemy within,
wants to kill us all? Why won’t our politicians deport the suspects? Why do
they invite more killers to come to Australia, when they know that these
disciples of Islam will work constantly to kill the Australian People?
The Muslim world has been ordered to kill the unbelievers, (that’s
all of us) they have found us a soft and easy target. Our cowardly limp
wrist’ed, corrupted governments have invited these killers into our community.
Commanded by their Mosque mullahs and ordered to kill us by many quotes in the
Koran. Encouraged by their successes, we the defenceless can only expect our
governments (who have 24 hour armed protection) to sacrifice more of us in the
name of cultural diversity.
How many have to die, before we begin to hang our corrupt treasonous politicians? They should be made accountable, for disarming the community leaving good people to be murdered, removing their ability to defend themselves and one another.
How many have to die, before we begin to hang our corrupt treasonous politicians? They should be made accountable, for disarming the community leaving good people to be murdered, removing their ability to defend themselves and one another.
How long will it take for the Australian people to realise that our
politicians are the Demons and the Mad Mullahs are the Devils?
Why do our politicians Cry Peace, when we all know our enemies
within, all want WAR.
Within Days, Our Politicians shift the media machine away from
Islamic’s murdering innocents with impunity to blaming Firearm Owners by
spending millions of our money on a Firearm Amnesty. Its Insulting our
Intelligence.

But Where is the Rage?
Obviously, the Flowers and pink Teddy Bears did not work. Nor did the flower power, hippy ‘All we need is love’ and unity messages put out by our treasonous leaders. Within a week they struck again in London and again in Brighton, Melbourne. Governments cultivation of passivity, pours oil on troubled waters, and sends active citizens deeper into slumber land. It diminishes us as citizens, subjugates us to TV Norms and candle-holders in the face of serious acts of violence against our community. This governments softly, softly approach after every terrorist attack is just giving aid and comfort to our attackers. Terrorism pursues a war of attrition against our social fabric, seeking to rip away bit by bit our confidence and openness and sense of ourselves as individual free citizens. Officialdom with their media again diminish our individuality by instructing us on what we may feel, and think, and say, discouraging us from confronting these atrocities and the ideological and violent rot behind them. The terrorist seeks to weaken our resolve, the Government wants to tranquilize our rage, withdraw our anger, and reduce us to wet-eyed ninnies.

When are we going to Rage about the dying?
When sadly the Grenfell apartment block accidentally catches alight and kills Muslims, there is no words of unity and forgiveness, donate a pink teddy bear and lay truck loads of flowers, when its Muslims, the rage is okay, they can have a riot with government assistance. Yet we have to forgive them again.
When sadly the Grenfell apartment block accidentally catches alight and kills Muslims, there is no words of unity and forgiveness, donate a pink teddy bear and lay truck loads of flowers, when its Muslims, the rage is okay, they can have a riot with government assistance. Yet we have to forgive them again.
“Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,
And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,
Do not go gentle into that good night.
Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight
Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,
Rage, rage against the dying of the light.” Dylan Thomas.
We westerners are not allowed to ask why our children died, or rage against their dying. It is becoming clear that the top-down promotion of a hollow togetherness in response to terrorism is about cultivating passivity. As when 20 or 40 innocents are butchered why do our politicians do a “Wag the Dog” and spin it around to blame ‘Islamophobe’s’ or what’s been said on facebook? This is not just an Australian Phenomena it is through-out the Western world. Hilary Clinton and Obama blamed a video that supposedly mocked Islam and the Prophet Mohammed, for the death of the U.S. Ambassador to Libya, Christopher Stevens, when everyone with half a brain knew that it was just another planned terror attack. Angela Merkel declares “Islam is not the source of terrorism” but the source is Christians who make Muslims feel angry because of “Islamophobia”
The reality is that the ideology of Islam, is already responsible for the slaughter of at least 270 million non-Muslims, and as to be identified as a Muslim they have to obey the dictates of their holy Quran (Koran) results in worldwide genocide of all who do not agree with them.
Quote, just two of many.
“Quran (8:12) – “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who
disbelieve. Therefore strike off their heads and strike off every fingertip of
them”
Quran (9:5) – “So when the sacred months have passed away, then slay
the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captive and besiege them
and lie in wait for them in every ambush.”
This book has caused the Muslim Jihads Crusades which for many years
conquered and pillaged North Africa, Southern Europe, the Balkans, the Middle
East and India. The instructions within their Holy Book is far more devilish
than Hitlers Mein Kampf (National Socialism) or Karl Marx Communist
Manifesto,(Communist Manifesto). This Quran book is the catalyst for the recent
attacks on the western world.
A Turkish friend of mine explained the whole Islamic mentality is
training people to judge the rest of humanity, as either a Slave or a Master.
If one has more power of any sort, then they are the Master, and must be
obeyed, if they personally have more power over another, then they are a Slave
and their only purpose is to serve or die.
We cannot keep excusing this behaviour as having nothing to do with
Islam. According to Islam’s history, this exact conduct is a deeply inherent,
continuing for 1,400 years without ceasing. Without slaughter, Islam has no
history or contribution to the world.
Lets get this problem identified, its not a Racial issue, Muslims can
be from any race and it is not a religious issue, our enemies unlike any other
religions do not want to convert people by good examples, (miracles) by good
works, by discussion, this ideology seeks world domination, world control by
the application of fear. If you are not one of them and they are strong enough,
your only short survival will be as a slave, most and for the majority, surplus
to requirements you can only expect death.


All of us are targeted, by controlled suicidal maniacs who are
programmed to kill with any tool at their disposal, knives, aircraft, trucks,
bombs, guns, poisons, gas. tactics as arson, vehicle rampage attacks, bomb
threats, suicide attacks, bombings, shootings, stabbing, highjackings,
kidnapping and beheading’s. As it is, most of you will know of someone who has
been affected by this latest war, since 1979 over 20,930 people have been
killed, and 52,719 plus have been wounded. This war which had its beginnings
1400 years ago, has come to the fore in the last few years and only has signs
of escalation, due to government enforced “helplessness” of the general
population. Of course our politicians are not the ones being killed, they and
their armed police buy the best protection our taxpayers dollars can provide.
We are not running from school bullies, we are not all able to run or hide, and
more than likely will have no time to tell anyone about it. They use us, as
sacrificial lambs, like sending soldiers to war without any ammunition, then
sermonise on, togetherness, and pacifistic nonsense, reducing us to a line of
bawling pallbearers whose only purpose is to fill the streets with pink
balloons, teddy bears and flowers, or hold another candle light vigil in memory
of our fellow citizens. The government response to the massacres of over 20,000
civilians is “All you need is love”, and have another Gun Amnesty.
“Don’t let them break our Unity”.
How inverse of them to say that, how ignorant of the facts, we are not unified, the government has allowed a howling rapacious killing machine into our midst and wants to use them as an excuse to totally control us all. Do they really want us to have Unity with our own killers. What are their values, what are our values? Our governments do not want us to have core values that a good society can be built on. They would hate us to be unified that would take away their power, they want us soaked in a grey ABC apathy. That is why they have introduced “diversity”, on a moral and cultural basis.
How inverse of them to say that, how ignorant of the facts, we are not unified, the government has allowed a howling rapacious killing machine into our midst and wants to use them as an excuse to totally control us all. Do they really want us to have Unity with our own killers. What are their values, what are our values? Our governments do not want us to have core values that a good society can be built on. They would hate us to be unified that would take away their power, they want us soaked in a grey ABC apathy. That is why they have introduced “diversity”, on a moral and cultural basis.
Admit to having core values in a society designed to operate on diversity, suggest that any particular evil ideology poses a threat to the community and you will be singled out to face the star chamber “Discrimination” Courts. Government’s cry of unity is a lie. The fact is, there are people in our society willing to attack us, others who will think those attacks are justified, and others still who will apologise for those attacks by saying they are a product of Islamophobia or of Western intervention, when really the object is to end Western civilisation, end freedom, free thought and end individualism. We are far from united. We are deeply divided, but not allowed to say so.
We are all considered expendable.
Governments that no longer guarantee the security of their citizens are worthless, and those that disallow their own citizens the right and the means to defend themselves are worse then negligent, they are clearly dangerous to support in any way. Most people are slowly awakening to this realism, but its more than likely too late to prevent our streets turning into rivers of blood. The government wants us passive, empathetic, upset, not angry, or active, or questioning the disparity between these. They prefer us as a lonely crowd of dutiful, disconnected griever’s rather than a real collective of citizens demanding to know why our fellow citizens are being killed and how we might prevent others from dying. We have to stop playing the part that they have created for us, we have to remind them of the horrors that they have inflicted on us and vote for change. To do this we have to express Anger? Fury? Rage, if not they will reinforce a mass media forcefield that will blanket out the reality of the revolution that they have introduced in to our national society.
Governments that no longer guarantee the security of their citizens are worthless, and those that disallow their own citizens the right and the means to defend themselves are worse then negligent, they are clearly dangerous to support in any way. Most people are slowly awakening to this realism, but its more than likely too late to prevent our streets turning into rivers of blood. The government wants us passive, empathetic, upset, not angry, or active, or questioning the disparity between these. They prefer us as a lonely crowd of dutiful, disconnected griever’s rather than a real collective of citizens demanding to know why our fellow citizens are being killed and how we might prevent others from dying. We have to stop playing the part that they have created for us, we have to remind them of the horrors that they have inflicted on us and vote for change. To do this we have to express Anger? Fury? Rage, if not they will reinforce a mass media forcefield that will blanket out the reality of the revolution that they have introduced in to our national society.
I posted the following on Owen Guns facebook page, it received 22086
hits, and 1032 people shared it within 24 hours. Lots re-posted it using their
own names. This idea has been accepted by many thousands of people so please
put your name on the first line and send it around to at least your local
members of parliament and put it on as many electronic notice boards as
possible .
“I Ron Owen a freeborn, law abiding citizen, demand that the right to
carry a firearm suitable for defence is reinstated. There is irrefutable
facts to prove that for some years a large international group of Islamic
fanatics wish to kill us all randomly and that our government is incapable, or
does not wish to act, to defend us. I do not want to be sacrificed to a
politicians pacifistic idealism, I do not want to go in fear, I have a right to
defend my life and the lives of the people I abide with. It is perverse that
our people are being butchered in worldwide genocide and our leaders say, love,
unity and multiculturalism is the answer, while they are surrounded by tax
payer armed guards. If the recent massacre of children and their parents on a
fun night out doesn’t make you want to defend yourselves or defend your right
to survival, nothing will. The terrorist has defeated you. You are dead
already, but you have no right to prevent me from choosing to defend my
family.”
NATIONAL FIREARM (Dis) AGREEMENT.
Our Governments response to Terrorism, the cold blooded murder of our fellow Australians by Mad Monis, Lindt Choclate café and others, has not been to extradite all known extremists, close Mosques, or Ban The Quran. No, the response has been a new NFA to pour more impositions on lawful firearm owners. Please read our last Bulletin on Ammunition limits. http://www.owenguns.com/owen-guns-bulletin-may-edition-132-2017/
Our Governments response to Terrorism, the cold blooded murder of our fellow Australians by Mad Monis, Lindt Choclate café and others, has not been to extradite all known extremists, close Mosques, or Ban The Quran. No, the response has been a new NFA to pour more impositions on lawful firearm owners. Please read our last Bulletin on Ammunition limits. http://www.owenguns.com/owen-guns-bulletin-may-edition-132-2017/
We have our banner on lodging a protest on Bruce Highway,
next to the Owen Guns shop, they cost $250. each. They are 6
metres long if you have a site and the $250. we will provide the banner. They
are vinyl sheeting with ropes attached.
There are many other impositions for collectors and heirlooms please
read it all.
The other outcome is the latest Firearm Amnesty which will begin on the 1st July 2017 and be in place for 3 months.
The other outcome is the latest Firearm Amnesty which will begin on the 1st July 2017 and be in place for 3 months.
For many it might seem harmless, but it is another ploy to remove
firearms from law abiding citizens, another few million dollars of the tax
payers dollars being spent on worrying the good and supporting the evil anti
gun movement. Firearms are tools, they can be used for food gathering and
defending homes and families. Historically they are safer in peoples homes
rather than Police Stations, as many will remember, the AR15 that was
supposedly used for the Port Arthur massacre had been handed in during an
Amnesty in Victoria and then turned up burned at the Seahaven lodge after Port
Arthur.
The whole idea that Criminals are going to hand in their firearms,
(which some have cost them in excess of $5000.) because the government has
increased the penalties is ludicrous, the idea that Terrorist would feel for
one second that they should hand in their firearms is even more preposterous.
It’s a waste of time, money and human endeavour, even when the Police record
the ones handed over for registration they will more than likely make a
mistake, book it down for the wrong person, or its description will be wrong or
lose all record of it entirely. I received someone elses licence renewal the
other day, maybe someone else has mine. The whole system is fruitless, even the
weapons licence, any Crim will find some one to manufacture a licence. We
have Police selling hot guns, selling their own guns, and Police selling the
information from the registry and the Police Minister lying to members of the
house of representatives who requested the number of licenced shooters in his
area and the number of licenced shooters in the State of Queensland, or if not
lying unable to retrieve the information from the Q Prime Queensland Police
Firearm registry. So why bother with a Amnesty unless its to use more publicity
against the legitimate Firearm Owners.
Our best response is to encourage anyone who has no home for a
firearm to take it to the Licensed Dealers, or Licensed Armorer’s, DO NOT TAKE
IT TO THE POLICE, as only destruction will be its fate. Even if its no good at
all, some of the parts may assist some one else to keep their firearm. Of
course we would love you to donate your firearms to the Owen Guns Trust Museum
or give Owen Guns the option of purchasing your firearms, but any LICENCED
DEALER should assist you, and might even pay you some money. There are a
plethora of firearm owners, collectors and new shooters that would love to give
your firearm a new home. DO NOT TAKE IT TO THE POLICE, DO NOT LET
THE OTHER SIDE WIN.
Ron Owen.
Labels:
corruption,
enemy,
firearms,
freedoms,
government,
gun control,
legislation,
Owen guns,
rights,
self defence,
survival,
Thoughts for the week
Location:
Australia
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)












