Showing posts with label shootings. Show all posts
Showing posts with label shootings. Show all posts

Saturday, May 12, 2018

In The News Today 12-5-2018.


Home Invasions & Assaults 2018
Teen arrested over two 'frightening' attacks on women in Sydney's west
A man allegedly throws rocks at police in Darlington after attempted break-in
WA Police hunt for man in relation to sexual assault

Investigation continues into Margaret River massacre
Judge cries in court while sentencing woman who killed abusive partner
CCTV of missing 12-year-old moments before he was pulled into car

Humane Right to Armed Self defence.
The right of self-defense (also called, when it applies to the defense of another, alter ego defense, defense of others, defense of a third person) is the right for people to use reasonable force or defensive force, for the purpose of defending one's own life or the lives of others, including, in certain circumstances, the use of deadly force.[1]
If a defendant uses defensive force because of a threat of deadly or grievous harm by the other person, or a reasonable perception of such harm, the defendant is said to have a "perfect self-defensejustification.[2] If defendant uses defensive force because of such a perception, and the perception is not reasonable, the defendant may have an "imperfect self-defense" as an excuse.[2]

Thwarted by the demise of its global gun ban treaty, the United Nations declares the human right of self-defense null and void

As far as I can tell, no country is listed for restricting the natural, civil and human right to self-defense. So, it appears Human Rights Watch doesn’t care that people are prevented by their governments from protecting themselves. 

In legal terms, Australians have a right of self-defence. While some states rely on the common law and others have it enshrined in statute, the right itself is never questioned. Moreover, juries consistently refuse to convict those charged with serious offences whenever self-defence is made out.
What we don’t have is the practical ability to exercise that right. Possessing any object specifically for the purpose of self-defence, lethal or non-lethal, is a criminal offence. There are many women, raped and/or murdered, who would have been liable to prosecution had they been carrying anything that might have saved them.
The massive Police and government anti-terror apparatus failed yet again to protect the public. How many more reminders do the public need that the state is not their god and saviour? This is not a sleight at Police, but as we’ve discussed at length previously they are reactionary only and in terms of firearms, held to a lower standard than Category H licence holders. Even Queensland Police admit this.
It’s time to get serious about empowering the public by letting them have the opportunity to defend themselves, and end this useless and dangerous obsession with denying people the basic means and right to practical non-lethal and licenced lethal forms of self-defence, in the name of ‘muh public safety’.
RESIDENTS have backed calls from the Shooters Union Australia for the government to clarify and strengthen self-defence laws.
SUA vice president David Brown wants the ambiguity around gun laws, which leave licensed firearms owners at risk of prosecution for defending their homes from intruders, clarified.
Mr Brown this week told The Chronicle guns were the "only means of levelling the playing field against an aggressor", and his view has earned support from readers.
Human Rights Act 2004 Australia.
9 Right to life (1) Everyone has the right to life. In particular, no-one may be arbitrarily deprived of life.
11 Protection of the family and children Note Family has a broad meaning (see ICCPR General Comment 19 (39th session, 1990)). (1) The family is the natural and basic group unit of society and is entitled to be protected by society. (2) Every child has the right to the protection needed by the child because of being a child, without distinction or discrimination of any kind.
18 Right to liberty and security of person (1) Everyone has the right to liberty and security of person.
Part 3B Limits on human rights 28 Human rights may be limited (1) Human rights may be subject only to reasonable limits set by laws that can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society. (2) In deciding whether a limit is reasonable, all relevant factors must be considered, including the following: (a) the nature of the right affected; (b) the importance of the purpose of the limitation; (c) the nature and extent of the limitation; (d) the relationship between the limitation and its purpose; (e) any less restrictive means reasonably available to achieve the purpose the limitation seeks to achieve.

There is nothing in this human rights document that actually states that we have a right to defend ourselves or our families. The United Nations says that we have NO right to defend ourselves or our families against harm!

Possessing any object specifically for the purpose of self-defence, lethal or non-lethal, is a criminal offence (in Australia). There are many women, raped and/or murdered, who would have been liable to prosecution had they been carrying anything that might have saved them.
https://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/news/opinion/an-assault-on-our-right-to-selfprotection/news-story/f743f8b76f21a586a6efb2396c9b2f8d







Monday, April 16, 2018

Thoughts For The Week. Gun Control!


Well the Port Arthur Massacre certainly worked, & it is the belief of many, including some high ranking qualified people, that the massacre was orchestrated with government knowledge, & Martin Bryant has been falsely accused & imprisoned without any evidence of his guilt & without a coronal enquirie. The word is Bryant has been held in solitary confinement all this time to stop him talking to anyone. Certainly no news has been forthcoming from ex prisoners or the press!
For those that don't WANT to believe this, ask yourself this question: If the powers that be want the rest of our guns, when & where will the next shooting be?

Thoughts For the Week.
Another Symptom.
This week we had another pin prick that shows the contempt that the tyranny has for the 2 million plus law abiding licenced firearm owners in Australia. Page 132 ACIC Annual Report
https://acic.govcms.gov.au/sites/g/files/net1491/f/acic_2016-17_annual_report.pdf?v=1508387578
The Queensland Weapons Licencing Branch informed us that from now on they are not going to answer the telephone on Wednesdays. That seem innocuous, harmless, non offensive, it does not bother you until you turn up at your local Gun shop after driving for 5 hours to find out that Weapons Licencing have made a simple mistake on your Permit to Aquire, you need to get it altered Weapons Licencing are the only ones that can change it so you want to phone them. Sorry, it’s a Wednesday and they do not answer their phone to the likes of us poor peasants on Wednesday. Of course, if it was another policeman phoning they would have no trouble, nor would the police minister. They are not available even on Mondays Tuesdays, Thursdays and Fridays after 4 pm. Try an Urgent Email and you will get an immediate response stating that Weapons Licencing will respond within 28 days.
At that point the law abiding citizen recalls that he has waited already for 5 months to get his licence and another 3 months to get his PTA and had to make copious (if not 50) phone calls, just to be told by a robot, If this call is related to an application please do not call for the 12 weeks as we are busy. So then he, or she grits their teeth swears that they will never vote for a major party ever again and prepares to drive, back to their home in Quilpe. What puts even more anger in their hearts is when they realise that by the legislation,
Weapons Regulation 2016
101 Waiting period for decision on application for permit to acquire
(1)This section prescribes the period for section 42 of the Act .
(2)The period is 28 days after the day the applicant lodged the application for the permit to acquire the weapon.
(3)However, the period is the remainder of the day on which the applicant lodged the applicationfor the permit, if—
(a)the applicant already holds a firearm under a licence; or
(b)an authorised officer is satisfied there are exceptional circumstances
If we mere slaves of the system did not comply with this legislation we would be charged and prosecuted, if we were just one day late with a renewal we lose our licence, we lose our property, yet they the police are responsible to no one. They can take as long as they like.
Now please don’t get me wrong, I am not saying that every policeman is evil, or that they are all soley responsible for all of this. That is not true. They believe that they are doing their job, following orders. I too for many years worked for the Government in the Army and in Prison Institutions I too followed orders. Like doctors and nurses we isolate our consciences, with a large plate of the “The End Justifies the Means”, but at the Nuernberg Trials the Judges correctly found that if you know (mens rea, latin) what your doing is wrong, it is a crime. On that basis German soldiers were sentenced to death for using that same excuse. There is also a certain amount of elitism, an ‘us’ and ‘them’culture within the politicians who are much more responsible for these chains to our freedom. They do not mind disarming the people who they represent and using firearms to force that disarmament, whats more they see there security far more important then ours and ensure that their lives and families are well guarded with firearms.

Why Do They Want the Guns of the Law Abiding, When they Know they Cannot Take Them from Criminals?
Once we leave the ‘pit face’ of law abiding firearm owners struggling with bureaucracy and ask the questions of why are they doing all of this to us, we see it as totally illogical. Firearm disarmament is not the only issue, but it is our enemies first goal, then they move on discrimination, removed the freedom of speech, forced immigration, destruction of our culture, destruction of the family unit, dumb down the education system, propaganda in schools and university’s, Nationalism, being proud of our country, exporting our jobs, green socialism rammed down our necks The simple fact is that normal, responsible, honest people in the country are absolutely fed up with being ignored while simultaneously being taxed into oblivion. You could choose any one of a hundred issues and the central argument would still be valid. Good people are being repeatedly penalized by a government that refuses to deal with real issues, our issues instead they create more of them.
We’re overtaxed, we pay too much for electicity, we are over regulated, we are under represented, we’re disregarded. Our words are ignored and only the bimbos and bimb ets on the 6 o clock news are believed. We need some one to stand up for the majority? As we are the majority. “The law-abiding citizens of this community, of other communities we are the first ones taxed, the first ones to be prosecuted and the last ones to be considered. We need a leader to listen to the majority of the people, and even if the full majority have no inclination of own a firearm, they are affected by all these hundreds of other issues and have no wish to disarm the other half of the majority. The majority of the people are like us law-abiding, and they follow the law. They too want their constitutional rights to be free.
They know as well as us that the criminals are going to hold on to their guns. Criminals will always have the money to buy guns. They know that armed criminals will still break into their houses and shoot them, they know that the Politicians have the Police and the Army to protect themselves and out their bidding, but they are not going to protect the majority of law abiding citizens, they no their best defence is their neighbour who has a gun. We all want to be that good neighbour.
Think?
What are We? Who Are We? Are We Free People?
Do We live in FREEDOM?
For those who have Forgotten.
The definition is: The quality, or state of being free: with the absence of necessity, coercion, or constraint in choice, or action. Free from restraint or from the power of another person or government. The Free right of independent thought and action. Having the freedom of being exempt or release from some onerous tyranny. The freedom to defend their lives and the lives of their families Freedom of movement. Freedom to own and use their own property, and the freedom to defend that property. The Freedom of Speech and Free thought. Freedom, a political right to take part in the decision making of their nation.
Or Are we SUBJUGATED?
Defined as already a defeated nation under control of (someone or something) restrained by the use of force, suppressed, under the obedience of a group of people, people that are under the influence or controlled by people in other countries.
Are we Australians FREE or SUBJUGATED?
Before we go into the next War? Who are we fighting for? It might be worth while, if we had FREEDOM to fight For but when we Join the Military Forces, or are conscripted we are not FREE, once Australia is at War we are all under Martial Law. Freedom is then not even a Glimmer of Light from a Black Hole.
Are we going to War putting ourselves and our families under jeopardy, losing even more freedoms more rights just to fight for the One World Government, the Trialatralists, or the Bilderbergers, or who ever George Soros is working for. To return to our past freedoms we have to appreciate who is the real enemy?
Where is this slavery of nations all coming from?
Our political Lib, Nat, Labs and Greens are ‘all soldiers of the working day’ for the internationalist who have been grabbing power since World War Two, basically un checked, accept for the Brexit and Trump failures. They are the masters who decide which political parties get the big election donations and the golden light from mainstreams media. Our Constitutional rights and freedoms are an antipathy to them. Free people are surplus to their requirements.
“Never underestimate the power of a few committed people to change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.”
Margaret Meade.
Throughout modern history, numerous politicians and members of this powerful elite have spoken out about their support for a one world government or a New World Order, which has been a name used for three centuries, but of course by different people. The New World Order is the supposed goal of a handful of global elitists who are pushing for a one world government and a heightened national security state. This group, often referred to as the Cabal, has been using foreign threats to heighten security, strip us of our rights, and invade other countries. These Bilderberger, Trialatralists are the same members of the elite class who control most governments, sometimes referred to as the “shadow government.” Numerous politicians have publicly discussed the people who secretly control the U.S. political system, creating laws and bending them.
John F. Hylan, former Mayor of New York City, explained:
“The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation . . . The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. They practically control both parties . . . [and] control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.”
Canadian economist Dr. Michel Chossudovsky, who is the University of Ottawa’s Emeritus Professor of Economics, also gave a great speech at the International Conference on the New World Order. Who is this group of elites? Well, Dr. Chossudovsky believes it originates with those who control the U.S., Israel, and other western allies.

Who is controlling these countries and this massive global agenda?
The shadow government includes billionaire families like the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds, members of the financial elite like George Soros, and large corporations and big banks. The following video from THRIVE Movement, a documentary created by the heir to Proctor & Gamble, Foster Gamble, perfectly explains how this system works:
Other countries are publicly recognizing the role the elite plays in the U.S. government. For example, after Bill Clinton accused Poland and Hungary of turning into a “Putin-like” and “authoritarian dictatorship” last year, their governments saw right through it.
Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán responded by saying, “The remarks made about Hungary and Poland … have a political dimension. These are not accidental slips of the tongue. And these slips or remarks have been multiplying since we are living in the era of the migrant crisis. And we all know that behind the leaders of the Democratic Party, we have to see George Soros.”He went on to say that “the mouth is Clinton’s but the voice is of George Soros.” https://www.westmonster.com/soros-gives-another-400k-to-anti-brexit-group/
As we have covered in previous issues George Soros seems to be the conduit that channels the money to places of maximum advantage to the group, George has personal wealth and assets of over a 25 Billion but the recent payment of 18 Billion to the Open Society Foundation, (which funds Get Up, Gun Control Australia, and the Greens) is derived from other elitists with more money than George.

David Rockefeller deceased now but his foundations still live on was one of the largest contributors for the implementation of a one world power. In a rare transcript smuggled out from a 1991 Bilderberg group meeting in Baden, Germany, we can realise how deluded Rockefeller’s views truly were. Bill Clinton also attended this meeting with many other members of the elite class.
David Rockefeller stated:
“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march toward a world government. . . . The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practised in past centuries. (source)”
Security for the Bilderberg meeting to keep the riff raff out. As the World Government is inside.
This quote is extremely revealing, as it proves that not only has he been striving to create a one world government since well before 1991, but mainstream media (MSM) news outlets were aware of it and chose not to disclose this information to the public. It’s disturbing that MSM turned a blind eye to this; however, it’s not really surprising given the fact that the elite people attending these Bilderberg meetings are the very people who fund and control these corporations.
Dangerous Times Ahead.
If we cannot use the internet, like that old saying, “In the land of the blind the one eyed man is king”, be under no illusions the good people of the western world will be defeated by our own democracy. Our opponents do not need logic, or rights, or good intentions to change our society, all they need is control of mainstream media, that produces their votes and as we continue to slip into a nation of mindless controlled zombies, (not in the context of the resurrection of the dead) lifeless, apathetic, completely unresponsive to their surroundings, the blind will become blinder and reality will become even more ‘unbelievable’. This is the most dangerous threat to our way of living since Hitler was planning his conquest of the world.
There is no Spring without Winter, without Mistakes there is no Learning. There is no Life without Death, without Doubts there is no Faith. There is no Peace without War, without Fear there is no Courage. For without Mistakes, Doubts and Fears there are no pathways to Wisdom.
Ron Owen


Wednesday, April 4, 2018

David Hogg NOT in school day of shooting?







These are the sort of people that spread lies & misinformation
for the anti-gun lobby. DO NOT believe all that the government tells you. Gun
confiscation will NOT stop gun crime. We NEED sensible gun laws, but we need to tackle social problems too if we are to combat gun crime & crime in general.

So where was Mr Hogg at the time of the shooting? Who was the second shooter that has not been identified? Was Hogg the second shooter? Who orchestrated this shooting? Was the anti-gun lobby involved? Was the government involved?

Just like the Port Arthur shootings here in Australia, there are a lot of questions unanswered!!!